Cover not available

Article published In: Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Vol. 13:1 (2015) ► pp.59–80

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF

Accent-induced coder bias

Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 23 June 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.13.1.03slo
Recent research has shown that speech perception can easily be influenced by the overall accent of the speaker. This paper investigates whether such accentinduced bias also occurs in speech transcription by professional and linguistically trained coders and to what extent such a bias may affect linguistic analyses. We compare the transcriptions of the Bären vowel in Standard German with the acoustic values of these vowels, as well as sociolinguistic analyses based on both of these. The results of the two analyses turn out to be considerably different. Further examination shows that the coders only partly relied on the acoustic values. The residual does not consist of random errors, but correlate with the degree of accentedness of the speakers. We conclude that this accent-induced coder bias led the coders to transcribe the codings according to their expectations about the pronunciation in the local dialect – expectations that were quite different from the acoustic reality.
References (55)
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2010). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. [computer program].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brennan, E.M., & Brennan, J.S. (1981). Accent scaling and language attitudes: Reactions to Mexican American English speech. Language and Speech, 24(3), 207–221. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, J.L. (1999). Usage-based phonology. Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics, 11, 211–242. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2007). From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language, 82(4), 711–733. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Christy, A.L. (2010). The effects of explicit knowledge of and implicit attitudes about race on adult perceptions of children’s speech. Unpublished MA thesis, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cronbach, L.J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cutler, A., Eisner, F., McQueen, J.M., & Norris, D. (2010). How abstract phonemic categories are necessary for coping with speaker-related variation. Laboratory Phonology, 101, 91–111.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drager, K. (2005). From bad to bed: The relationship between perceived age and vowel perception in New Zealand English. Te Reo, 481, 55–68.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2010). Sociophonetic variation in speech perception. Language and Linguistics Compass, 4(7), 473–480. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2011). Speaker age and vowel perception. Language and Speech, 54(1), 99–121. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Escudero, P., Boersma, P., Rauber, A.S., & Bion, R.A.H. (2009). A cross-dialect acoustic description of vowels: Brazilian and European Portuguese RID E-6746-2011. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126(3), 1379–1393. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, K.E. (2012). Unpacking listener bias: The effects of attitudes, knowledge, and experience on clinician’s ratings of African-American children’s speech. Unpublished MA thesis, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giles, H. (1973). Accent mobility: A model and some data. Anthropological Linguistics, 151, 87–105.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hall-Lew, L., & Fix, S. (2012). Perceptual coding reliability of (L)-vocalization in casual speech data. Lingua, 122(7), 794–809. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hay, J., & Drager, K. (2010). Stuffed toys and speech perception. Linguistics, 48(4), 865–892. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hay, J., Nolan, A., & Drager, K. (2006). From fush to feesh: Exemplar priming in speech perception. The Linguistic Review, 23(3), 351–379. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hay, J., Warren, P., & Drager, K. (2006). Factors influencing speech perception in the context of a merger-in-progress. Journal of Phonetics, 34(4), 458–484. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heeringa, W., & Hinskens, F. (2014). Convergence between dialect varieties and dialect groups in the Dutch language area. In B. Szmrecsanyi & B. Wälchli (Eds.), Aggregating dialectology, typology, and register analysis: Linguistic variation in text and speech (pp. 26–52). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hinskens, F., & van Oostendorp, M. (2009). Sources of phonological variation in a large database for Dutch dialects. In S. Tsiplakou, M. Karyolemou, & P.Y. Pavlou (Eds.), Language variation-European perspectives II: Selected papers from the 4th international conference on language variation in Europe (ICLaVE 4), Nicosia, June 2007 (pp. 103–118). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hove, I. (2002). Die Aussprache der Standardsprache in der deutschen Schweiz. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huesmann, A. (1998). Zwischen Dialekt und Standard: Empirische Untersuchung zur Soziolinguistik des Varietätenspektrums im deutschen. Tübingen, Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kang, O., & Rubin, D.L. (2009). Reverse linguistic stereotyping: Measuring the effect of listener expectations on speech evaluation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 28(4), 441–456. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klausmann, H. (1985). Die breisgauer Mundarten. Teil 1. Textband. Marburg: N.G. Elwert Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
König, W. (1989). Atlas zur Aussprache des Schriftdeutschen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Ismaening: Max Hueber Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kinzler, K.D., Shutts, K., Dejesus, J., & Spelke, E.S. (2009). Accent trumps race in guiding children’s social preferences. Social Cognition, 27(4), 623–634. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2006). The social stratification of English in New York City. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Löffler, H. (1994). Germanistische Soziolinguistik. Berlin: Ehrich Schmidt Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mangold, M. (1994). Duden Aussprachewörterbuch. Mannheim: Duden Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Munro, M.J., Derwing, T.M., & Flege, J.E. (1999). Canadians in Alabama: A perceptual study of dialect acquisition in adults. Journal of Phonetics, 27(4), 385–403. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Niedzielski, N. (1999). The effect of social information on the perception of sociolinguistic variables. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 18(1), 62–85. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Noth, H. (1993). Alemannisches Dialekthandbuch vom Kaiserstuhl und seiner Umgebung. Freiburg i. Br: Schillinger Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1996). Breisgauer Alemannische Kurzgrammatik. Freiburg: Verein zur Förderung der Landeskunde an den Schulen e.V.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palmeri, T.J., Goldinger, S.D., & Pisoni, D.B. (1993). Episodic encoding of voice attributes and recognition memory for spoken words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(2), 309–328. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J.B. (2001). Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast. Typological Studies in Language, 451, 137–158. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pietraszewski, D., & Schwartz, A. (2014). Evidence that accent is a dimension of social categorization, not a byproduct of perceptual salience, familiarity, or ease-of-processing. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35(1), 43–50. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Preston, D.R. (1993). Folk dialect maps. In A.W. Glowka & D.M. Lance (Eds.), Language variation in North American English: Research and teaching (pp. 333–377). New York: Modern Language Association of America.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Development Core Team. (2009). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rakić, T., Steffens, M.C., & Mummendey, A. (2011). Blinded by the accent! the minor role of looks in ethnic categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(1), 16–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Repp, B.H., & Liberman, A.M. (1987). Phonetic category boundaries are flexible. In S. Harnad (Ed.), Categorical perception: The groundwork of cognition (89–112). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rubin, D.L. (1992). Nonlanguage factors affecting undergraduates’ judgments of nonnative english-speaking teaching assistants. Research in Higher Education, 33(4), 511–531. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sloos, M. (2012). Standard or dialect? A new online elicitation method. Dialectologia, 91, 98–113.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2013a). Frequency and phonological grammar: An integrated approach. evidence from German, Indonesian, and Japanese. PhD dissertation. University of Groningen.
. (2013b). Halo! don’t always trust the native speaker. In C. Conlan (Ed.), Evolving paradigms: Language and applied linguistics in a changing world (pp. 325–350). Perth: Applied Linguistics Association of Australia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spiekermann, H. (2008). Sprache in Baden-Württemberg: Merkmale des regionalen Standards. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stearns, M.J., & Voge, W. (1979). The contemporary pronunciation of long in Modern Standard German: A data-based, computer-assisted analysis. In J. Köster (Ed.), Hamburger Phonetische Beiträge. Untersuchungen zur Phonetik und Linguistik. Miszellen VI (pp. 127–181). Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steger, H. (1989). Südwestdeutscher Sprachatlas. Marburg: Elwert.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traunmüller, H. (1990). Analytical expressions for the tonotopic sensory scale. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88(1), 97–100. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Bezooijen, R., & van Heuven, V. (2010). Avant-garde Dutch: A perceptual, acoustic and evaluational study. In D.R. Preston, & N.A. Niedzielski (Eds.), A reader in sociophonetics (pp. 357–378). New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Veer, B. van der. (2006). The Italian ‘mobile diphthongs’: A test case for experimental phonetics and phonological theory. PhD dissertation. Utrecht: LOT Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Heugten, M., & Johnson, E.K. (2014). Learning to contend with accents in infancy: Benefits of brief speaker exposure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(1), 340–350. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Heuven, V., van Bezooijen, R., & Edelman, L. (2005). Pronunciation of /ɛi/ in avant-garde Dutch: A cross–sex acoustic study. In M. Filppula, J. Klemola, M. Palander, & E. Penttila (Eds.), Dialects across borders (pp. 185–210). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Heuven, V., & van der Veer, B. (2003). Speech shadowing as an elicitation technique in variation research: The case of the Italian mobile diphthongs. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences , Barcelona (pp. 2805–2808).
Wiesinger, P. (1970). Phonetisch-phonologische Untersuchungen zur Vokalentwicklung in den deutschen Dialekten. I. die Langvokale im Hochdeutschen. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Williams, A., Garrett, P., & Coupland, N. (1999). Dialect recognition. In D. Preston (Ed.), Handbook of perceptual dialectology (pp. 345–358). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Terziyan, Treysi
2024. Testing the waters. Written Language & Literacy 27:1 ► pp. 64 ff. DOI logo
Yang, Chunlei
2024. Three worlds of variables to control in linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics 50:3-4 ► pp. 285 ff. DOI logo
Sloos, Marjoleine & Wang Lei
2018. Same stimuli, same subjects, different perception. Asia-Pacific Language Variation 4:2 ► pp. 231 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue