Cover not available

Article published In: Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Vol. 12:2 (2014) ► pp.288–303

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Cultural-historical psychology and the cognitive view of metonymy and metaphor

 | Gymnasium 1514, Moscow
Published online: 31 October 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.12.2.02gle
Metonymy and metaphor are commonly taken as cognitive phenomena in modern cognitive linguistics rather than as mere figures of speech. However, the correct cognitive demarcation between metonymy and metaphor is the subject of intense debate; there are also different attitudes to the cognitive basis of metonymy. The main contribution of this paper is to identify the cognitive mechanism called complex thinking, which is well-known in psychology but hardly applied in linguistics, as the cognitive basis for metonymy; the difference between complex and conceptual thinking is also highlighted in order to distinguish between conceptual metonymy and conceptual metaphor. Using a cultural-historical approach, we can conjecture that metonymy dominates in pre-theoretical cultures, whereas metaphor emerges in theoretical cultures alongside abstract conceptual domains. In order to illustrate these points with a brief case study, the semantic evolution of the ancient Greek word Ûlh (matter) is considered.
References (54)
Arata, L. (2005). The definition of metonymy in Ancient Greece. Style, 391, 55–71.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barcelona, A. (2011). Reviewing the properties and prototype structure of metonymy. In R. Benczes, A. Barcelona, & F.J. Ruiz de Mendoza (Eds.), Defining metonymy in cognitive linguistics: Towards a consensus view (pp. 7–57). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berry, J. (1976). Human ecology and cognitive style: Comparative studies in cultural and psychological adaptation. New York: Sage/Halsted.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Byrne, C. (2001). Matter and Aristotle’s material cause. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 31, (1), 85–112. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cole, M., Mesheryakov, B., & Ponomariov, I. (2011). Cross-cultural research in the cultural-historical activity theory tradition. In J. Fons, A. van de Vijver & S. Breugelmans (Eds.), Fundamental questions in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 261–287). Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cole, M., & Scribner, S. (1974). Culture and thought. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W. (2002). The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 161–205). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2006). On explaining metonymy: Comment on Peirsman and Geeraerts, ‘‘Metonymy as a prototypical category’’. Cognitive Linguistics, 171, 317–326. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deignan, A. (2005). Metaphor and corpus linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feyaerts, K. (2000). Refining the Inheritance Hypothesis: Interaction between metaphoric and metonymic hierarchies. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: a cognitive perspective (pp. 59–78). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frumkina, R. (2007). Social’noe poznanie v kontekste lingvistiki i psihologii. Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost’, 11, 145–156.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frumkina, R., & Mikheev, A. (1996). Meaning and categorization. New York: Nova Science.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frumkina, R., Miheev, A., Mostovaya, A., & Ryumina N. (1991). Semantika i kategorizaciya. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frumkina, R., & Mirkin, B. (1986). Semantika “konkretnoi” leksiki: psiholingvisticheskii podhod. Izvestiya Akademii Nauk SSSR . Seriya Literatury i yazyka, 45, 1, 12–22.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geeraerts, D. (2002). The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in composite expressions. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 435–465). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2005). Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glebkin, V. (2011). Hermeneutics and cognitive science: A preliminary approach. In B. Kokinov, 
A. Karmiloff-Smith & N.J. Nersessian (Eds.), European perspectives on cognitive science: Proceedings of the European conference on cognitive science EuroCogSci2011 (pp. 1–5). 
Sophia: New Bulgarian University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2012). Leksicheskaya semantika: kul’turno-istoricheskii podhod. Mosow: Centr gumanitarnyh iniciativ.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goossens, L. (1990). Metaphtonymy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action. Cognitive Linguistics, 11, 323–340. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (2002 [1956]). The metaphoric and metonymic poles. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 41–48). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z., & Radden, G. (1998). Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics, 91, 37–77. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. N.Y.: Basic books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R.W. (1993). Reference point constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 41, 1–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lévy-Bruhl, L. (1978). Primitive mentality. New York: AMS Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1979). How natives think. New York: Arno Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luria, A. (1976). Cognitive development: Its cultural and social foundations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Markus H.R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 2, 224–253. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mikheev, A. (1985). Svobodnaya klassifikaciya nabora predmetov (eksperiment v Nagornom Karabahe). In R. Frumkina (Ed.), Lingvisticheskie i psiholingvisticheskie struktury rechi (pp. 78–93). Moscow: Institut yazykoznapniya.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nisbett, R.E., Peng K., Choi I., & Norenzayan A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108 (2), 291–310. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norenzayan, A. (1999). Rule-based and experience-based thinking. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Michigan.
Onians, R. (1951). The origins of European thought about the body, the mind, the soul, the world, time and fate. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peirsman, Y., & Geeraerts, D. (2006a). Metonymy as a prototypical category. Cognitive Linguistics, 171, 269–316. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2006b). Don’t let metonymy be misunderstood: An answer to Croft. Cognitive Linguistics, 171, 327–335. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Radden, G. (2000). How metonymic are metaphors? In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (pp. 93–108). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Radden, G., & Kövecses, Z. (1999). Towards a theory of metonymy. In K.-U. Panther & 
G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (pp. 17–59). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Samuhin, N., Birenbaum, V., & Vygotsky, L. (1981 [1934]). K voprosu o demencii pri bolezni Pika. In Hrestomatiya po patopsihologii (pp. 114–149). Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo universiteta.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scaltsas, T. (1994). Substances and universals in Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Selischev, A. (1928). Yazyk revolyucionnoi epohi. Мoscow: Rabotnik prosvescheniya.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tulviste, P. (1991). The cultural-historical development of verbal thinking. Commack. N.Y.: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turner, M., & Fauconnier, G. (2000). Metaphor, metonymy and binding. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (pp. 133–145). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. (1984 [1933/1934]). Rannee detstvo. In L. Vygotsky Sobranie sochinenii, 41 (pp. 340–367). Moscow: Pedagogika.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wertsch, J., & Tulviste, P. (1992). L.S. Vygotsky and contemporary developmental psychology. Developmental Psychology, 281, 548–557. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Witkin, H.A. (1967). Cognitive-style approach to cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychology, 2 (4), 233–250. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Witkin, H.A., & Berry, J.W. (1975). Psychological differentiation in cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 6 (1), 4–87. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Witkin, H.A., Dyk, R.B., Fatersonh, F., Goodenougdh, R., & Karp, S.A. (1962). Psychological differentiation. N.Y.: Wiley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Witkin, H., Moore, C., Goodenough, D., & Cox, P. (1977). Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 47 (1), 1–64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Witt, C. (1989). Substance and essence in Aristotle: An interpretation of Metaphysics VII–IX. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2003). Ways of being: Potentiality and actuality in Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Ithaca: 
Cornell University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Ibero, Álvaro
2023. Iconography as System. The Structural Principles of Representation in Visual Culture. Art History & Criticism 19:1 ► pp. 112 ff. DOI logo
Geeraerts, Dirk & Lisbeth De Laet
2020. A note on the relative diachronic productivity of metaphor and metonymy. In Changes in meaning and function [IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature, 25], ► pp. 109 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2024. Cognitive Semantics [Cognitive Linguistic Studies in Cultural Contexts, 15], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue