Cover not available

Article published In: Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Vol. 12:1 (2014) ► pp.64–98

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Blending and folk theory in an explanation of irony

 | University of Debrecen
Published online: 23 April 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.12.1.03pal
This paper casts a critical glance at the traditional pragmatic view of irony as well as the most definitive theories of the 1980s and 1990s, and shows that most of these conceptions are incomplete: they have a limited sphere of explanatory sway, as attested by the occurrence of instances of ironic speech not conforming to these models. In order to avoid the uncertainties induced by previous approaches, this paper takes a cognitive stance and treats irony as a mode of thought rather than as a figure of speech. As a cognitive-conceptual phenomenon, this study argues, irony cannot be explained in one single definition but rather it should be treated as a matter of folk psychology. The paper also concludes that the ironies discussed in this study are related by the process of conceptual integration. Through a discussion of three ironies, this paper introduces a different way of thinking about irony.
References (115)
Attardo, S. (1997). The semantic foundations of cognitive theories of humor. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research , 10(4), 395–420. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2000a). Irony as relevant inappropriateness. Journal of Pragmatics , 32(6), 793-826. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2000b). Irony markers and functions: Towards a goal-oriented theory of irony and its processing. Rusk , 121, 3–20.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2002). Humor and irony in interaction: from mode adoption to failure of detection. In L. Anolli, R. Ciceri, & G. Riva (Eds.), Say not to say: New perspectives on miscommunication (pp. 159–179). Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2009). Irony. In J. L. Mey (Ed.), Concise encyclopedia of pragmatics (pp. 405–407). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Attardo, S., & Raskin, V. (1991). Script theory revis(it)ed: Joke similarity and joke representation model. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research , 41, 293– 347. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Attardo, S., Eisterhold, J., Hay, J., & Poggi, I. (2003). Multimodal markers of irony and sarcasm. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research , 16(2), 243–260. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barbe, K. (1995). Irony in context . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brandt, L. (2003). Humor and meaning construction in everyday speech: A mental space analysis. Paper presented at the 8th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, University of La Rioja, Spain.
Brisard, F. (1999). A critique of localism in and about tense theory (Doctoral dissertation). University of Antwerp.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brumark, A. (2006). Non-observance of Gricean maxims in family dinner table conversation. Journal of Pragmatics , 381, 1206–1238. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bryant, G., & Fox Tree, J. (2005). Is there an ironic tone of voice? Language and Speech , 48(3), 257–277. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheang, H. S., & Pell, M. D. (2008). The sound of sarcasm. Speech Communication , 501, 366–381. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, H. (1996). Using language . New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, H., & Gerrig, R. (1984). On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General , 1131, 121–126. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clift, R. (1999). Irony in conversation. Language in Society , 281, 523–553. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colston, H. L. (2000). On necessary conditions for verbal irony comprehension. Pragmatics & Cognition , 8(2), 277–324. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coulson, S. (2005). Sarcasm and the space structuring model. In S. Coulson & B. Lewandowska-­Tomaszczyk (Eds.), The literal and the nonliteral in language and thought (pp. 129–144). Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Creusere, M. (2000). A developmental test of theoretical perspectives on the understanding of verbal irony: Children’s recognition of allusion and pragmatic insincerity. Metaphor and Symbol , 151, 29–45. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Curcó, C. (2000). Irony: negation, echo and metarepresentation. Lingua , 1101, 257–280. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cutler, A. (1974). On saying what you mean without meaning what you say. In M. Lagaly, R. Fox, & A. Bruck (Eds.), Papers from the tenth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society (pp. 117–127). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cutrer, M. (1994). Time and tense in narratives and everyday language (Doctoral dissertation). University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davies, P. (1995). About time: Einstein’s unfinished revolution . New York, NY: Simon and 
Schuster.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dews, S., Kaplan, J., & Winner, E. (1995). Why not say it directly? The social functions of irony. Discourse Processes , 191, 347–367. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dews, S., & Winner, E. (1997). Attributing meaning to deliberately false utterances: The case of irony. In C. Mandell & A. McCabe (Eds.), The problem of meaning: Behavioral and cognitive perspectives (pp. 377–414). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1999). Obligatory processing of the literal and nonliteral meanings of ironic utterances. Journal of Pragmatics , 311, 1579–1599. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dews, S., Winner, E., Kaplan, J., Rosenblatt, E., Hunt, M., Lim, K., McGovern, A., Qualter, A., & Smarsh, B. (1996). Children’s understanding of the meaning and functions of verbal irony. Child Development , 67(6), 3071–3085. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, V., & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive Linguistics: An introduction . Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. ([1985] 1994). Mental spaces . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1994). Conceptual projection and middle spaces . San Diego: UCSD Cognitive Science Technical Report 9401.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1998). Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science , 22(2), 133–187. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities . New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Freyd, J. (1983). Shareability: The social psychology of epistemology. Cognitive Science , 71, 191–210. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. (1986). On the psycholinguistics of sarcasm. Journal of Experimental  Psychology: General , 1151, 3–15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding . New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1999). Interpreting what speakers say and implicate. Brain & Language , 681, 466–485. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2000). Making good psychology out of blending theory. Cognitive Linguistics , 111, 347–358.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2005). Literal and nonliteral meanings are corrupt ideas: A view from psycholinguistics. In S. Coulson, & B. Lewandowska (Eds.), The literal and nonliteral in language and thought (pp. 221–238). Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R., & Izett, C. (2005). Irony as persuasive communication. In H. Colston & A. Katz (Eds.), Figurative language comprehension: Social and cultural influences (pp. 131–151). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum and Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R., & O’Brien, J. (1991). Psychological aspects of irony understanding. Journal of Pragmatics , 161, 523–530. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R., O’Brien, J., & Doolittle, S. (1995). Inferring meanings that are not intended: Speakers’ intentions and irony comprehension. Discourse Processes , 201, 187–203. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giora, R. (1991). On the cognitive aspects of the joke. Journal of Pragmatics , 161, 465–485. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1995). On irony and negation. Discourse Processes , 191, 239–264. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1997). Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics , 8(3), 183–206. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2003). Recent trends in literal vs. figurative language research: The case of irony. Speech Pathology. Retrieved from [URL]
Giora, R., Fein, O., Ganzi, J., & Alkeslassy Levi, N. (2005). On negation as mitigation: The case of negative irony. Discourse Processes , 391,81–100. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Speech acts , Vol. 3 (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haiman, J. (1998). Talk is cheap: Sarcasm, alienation, and the evolution of language . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hamamoto, H. (1998). Irony from a cognitive perspective. In R. Carston & S. Uchida (Eds.), Relevance theory: Applications and implications (pp. 257–270). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harris, M., & Pexman, P. M. (2003). Children’s perceptions of the social functions of verbal irony. Discourse Processes , 361, 147–165. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hofstadter, D., & Gabora, L. (1989). Synopsis of a workshop on humor and cognition. Humor , 2(4), 417–440.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ito, A., & Takizawa, O. (1996). Why do people use irony?: The pragmatics of irony usage. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Computational Humor (IWCH’ 961) (pp. 21–28).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ivanko, S. L., & Pexman, P. M. (2003). Context incongruity and irony processing. Discourse Processes , 351, 241–279. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Katz, A. (2005). Discourse and sociocultural factors in understanding nonliteral language. In H. Colston & A. Katz (Eds.), Figurative language comprehension: Social and cultural influences (pp. 183–207). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum and Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Katz, A., Blasko, D., & Kamzerski, V. (2004). Saying what you don’t mean: Social influences on language processing. Current Directions in Psychological Science , 131, 186–189. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Katz, A., Cacciari, C., Gibbs, R., & Turner, M. (1998). Figurative language and thought . New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaufer, D. (1981). Understanding ironic communication. Journal of Pragmatics , 51, 495–510. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kempton, W. (1987). Two theories of home heat control. In D. Holland & N. Quinn (Eds.), Cultural models in language and thought (pp. 222–242). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kihara, Y. (2005). The mental space structure of verbal irony. Cognitive Linguistics , 161, 513–530. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kimmel, M. (2005). Culture regained: Situated and compound image schemas. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 285–311). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
King, B. (1989). The conceptual structure of emotional experience in Chinese (Doctoral dissertation). Ohio State University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kotthoff, H. (2002). Irony, quotation, and other forms of staged intertextuality: Double or contrastive perspectivation in conversation. In K. Graumann & W. Kallmeyer (Eds.), Perspective and perspectivation in discourse (pp. 201–233). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A practical introduction . Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008). Metaphor and emotion. In R. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 380–396). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kreuz, R. J. (1996). The use of verbal irony: Cues and constraints. In J. S. Mio & A. N. Katz (Eds.), Metaphor: Implications and applications (pp. 23–38). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence 
Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2000). The production and processing of verbal irony. Metaphor and Symbol , 151, 99–107. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kreuz, R. J., & Caucci, G. M. (2009). Social aspects of verbal irony use. In H. Pishwa (Ed.), Language and social cognition: Expression of the social mind (pp. 325– 345). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kreuz, R. J., & Glucksberg, S. (1989). How to be sarcastic: The echoic reminder theory of verbal irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General , 1181, 374–386. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kreuz, R. J., Long, D. L., & Church, M. B. (1991). On being ironic: Pragmatic and mnemonic implications. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity , 61, 149–162. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kreuz, R. J., & Link, K. E. (2002). Asymmetries in the use of verbal irony. Journal of Language and Social Psychology , 211, 127–143. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kreuz, R. J., & Roberts, R. (1995). Two cues for verbal irony: Hyperbole and the ironic tone of voice. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity , 10(1), 21–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kumon-Nakamura, S., Glucksberg, S., & Brown, M. (1995). How about another piece of pie: The allusional pretense theory of discourse irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General , 1241, 3–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1996). Moral politics . Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Kövecses, Z. (1987). The cognitive model of anger inherent in American English. In D. Holland & N. Quinn (Eds.), Cultural models in language and thought (pp. 195–221). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Littman, D., & Mey, J. (1991). The nature of irony: Toward a computational model of irony. Journal of Pragmatics , 151, 131–151. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Long, D. L., & Graesser, A. (1988). Wit and humor in discourse processing. Discourse Processes , 111, 35–60. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lucariello, J. (1994). Situational irony: A concept of events gone awry. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General , 1231, 129–145. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1995). Linguistic semantics: An introduction . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, R. (1992). Irony and universe of belief. Lingua , 871, 77–90. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2006). The psychology of humor: An integrative approach . London: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matthews, J. K., Hancock, J. T., & Dunham, P. J. (2006). The roles of politeness and humor in the asymmetry of affect in verbal irony. Discourse Processes , 41(1), 3–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mizzau, M. (1984). L’ironia [The irony] . Milan: Feltrinelli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Muecke, D. (1978). Irony markers. Poetics , 71, 363–375. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Partington, A. (2007). Irony and reversal of evaluation. Journal of Pragmatics , 391, 1547–1569. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pexman, P. M. (2008). It’s fascinating research: The cognition of verbal irony. Current Directions in Psychological Science , 171, 286–290. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pexman, P. M., & Glenwright, M. (2007). How do typically-developing children grasp the meaning of verbal irony? Journal of Neurolinguistics , 201, 178–196. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pexman, P. M., Ferretti, T. R., & Katz, A. N. (2000). Discourse factors that influence on-line reading of metaphor and irony. Discourse Processes , 291, 201–222. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pexman, P. M., Glenwright, M., Krol, A., & James, T. (2005). An acquired taste: Children’s perceptions of humor and teasing in verbal irony. Discourse Processes , 40(3), 259–288. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pilkington, A. (1997). Shades of Irony. Paper presented at the Ninth Annual Conference on Linguistics and Literature , University of North Texas.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pöppel, E. (1994). Temporal mechanisms in perception. In O. Sporns, & G. Tononi (Eds.), Selectionism and the brain. International Review of Neurobiology, 37 , 185–201. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raskin, V. (1985). Semantic mechanisms of humor . Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Regel, S., Gunter, T. C., & Friederici, A. D. (2011). Isn’t it ironic? An electrophysiological exploration of figurative language processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience , 23(2), 277–293. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reyes, A., Rosso, P., & Veale, T. (2013). A multidimensional approach for detecting irony in Twitter. Language Resources and Evaluation , 471, 239–268. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberts, R. M., & Kreuz, R. J. (1994). Why do people use figurative language? Psychological Science , 51, 159–163. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rockwell, P. (2000). Lower, slower, louder: Vocal cues of sarcasm. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research , 291, 483–495. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schütte, W. (1991). Scherzkommunikation unter Orchestermusikern [Humorous communication among orchestra musicians]. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Tomer, R., & Aharon-Peretz, J. (2005). The neuroanatomical basis of understanding sarcasm and its relationship to social cognition. Neuropsychology , 191, 288–300. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shibata, M., Toyomura, A., Itoh, H., & Abe, J. (2010). Neural substrates of irony comprehension: A functional MRI study. Brain Research , 13081, 114–123. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1981). Irony and the use-mention distinction. In P. Cole (Ed.), Radical pragmatics (pp. 295–318). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition . Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1998). Irony and relevance: A reply to Seto, Hamamoto and 
Yamanashi. In R. Carston & S. Uchida (Eds.), Relevance theory: Applications and implications (pp. 283–293). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sweetser, E., & Fauconnier, G. (1996). Cognitive links and domains: Basic aspects of mental space theory. In G. Fauconnier & E. Sweetser (Eds.), Spaces, worlds, and grammar (pp. 1–28). Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turner, M. (1996). The literary mind . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2001). Cognitive dimensions of social science: The way we think about politics, economics, law, and society . Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turner M., & Fauconnier, G. (1995). Conceptual integration and formal expression. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity , 101,183–204. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Utsumi, A. (1996). A unified theory of irony and its computational formalization. In Proceedings of the 16thInternational Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING’96) (pp. 962–967). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2000). Verbal irony as implicit display of ironic environment: Distinguishing ironic utterances from nonirony. Journal of Pragmatics , 32(12), 1777–1806. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Voßhagen, C. (1999). Opposition as a metonymic principle. In K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (pp. 289–308). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, D. (2006). The pragmatics of verbal irony: Echo or pretence? Lingua , 1161, 1722–1743. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (1992). On verbal irony. Lingua , 871, 53–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2004). Relevance theory. In L. R. Horn & G. Ward (Eds.), The handbook of Pragmatics (pp. 607–632). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yu, N. (1995). Metaphorical expression of anger and happiness in English and Chinese. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity , 101, 223–245. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zsilka, J. (1978). Jelentés-integráció [Meaning integration]. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (13)

Cited by 13 other publications

Shelley, Cameron
2024. Verbal Irony: Towards a Situational, Model-Based Account. In Model-Based Reasoning, Abductive Cognition, Creativity [Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, 70], ► pp. 497 ff. DOI logo
Katz, Albert N.
2023. Pictorial Irony and Sarcasm. In The Cambridge Handbook of Irony and Thought, ► pp. 402 ff. DOI logo
Pexman, Penny M.
2023. Irony and Thought: Developmental Insights. In The Cambridge Handbook of Irony and Thought, ► pp. 181 ff. DOI logo
Yuan, Guorong & Yi Sun
2023. A bibliometric study of metaphor research and its implications (2010–2020). Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 41:3 ► pp. 227 ff. DOI logo
Ioannou, Georgios
2020. The tragic in Greek drama and conceptual blending. Journal of Literary Semantics 49:2 ► pp. 167 ff. DOI logo
Dynel, Marta
2018. Taking cognisance of cognitive linguistic research on humour. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 16:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Athanasiadou, Angeliki
2017. Irony has a metonymic basis. In Irony in language use and communication [Figurative Thought and Language, 1], ► pp. 201 ff. DOI logo
Athanasiadou, Angeliki
2017. Cultural Conceptualisations of irony in Greek. In Advances in Cultural Linguistics [Cultural Linguistics, ], ► pp. 111 ff. DOI logo
Athanasiadou, Angeliki
2025. Verbal irony. In What makes a Figure [Figurative Thought and Language, 19], ► pp. 305 ff. DOI logo
Colston, Herbert L. & Angeliki Athanasiadou
2017. Introduction. In Irony in language use and communication [Figurative Thought and Language, 1], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Musolff, Andreas
2017. Metaphor, irony and sarcasm in public discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 109 ► pp. 95 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. Irony in Expressive, Nonlinguistic Media. In The Cambridge Handbook of Irony and Thought, ► pp. 365 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. Irony in Linguistic Communication. In The Cambridge Handbook of Irony and Thought, ► pp. 129 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue