Cover not available

Review published In: Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Vol. 10:1 (2012) ► pp.227–232

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required
Book review

Reka Benczes, Antonio Barcelona & Francisco J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.). Defining Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: Towards a Consensus View. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2011. 284 pp. ISBN 978-90-272-2382-1

Reviewed by
 | University of La Rioja
Published online: 15 June 2012
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.10.1.08die
References (12)
References
Gradečak-Erdeljić, T. (2005). Euphemisms in the language of politics or how metonymy opens one door but closes the other. In P. Cap (ed.), Pragmatics Today (pp. 287–299). Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (2006). Thinking Points: Communicating our American Values and Vision. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1993). Reference point constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 41, 1–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Panther, K. -U. & Thornburg, L. (1998). A cognitive approach to inferencing in conversations. Journal of Pragmatics, 301, 755–776. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(eds.). (2003). Metonymy and Pragmatic Inferencing. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Panther, K. -U., Thornburg, L. & Barcelona, A. (eds.). (2009). Metonymy and Metaphor in Grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J. (1999). Implicatures, explicatures, and conceptual mappings. In J. L. Cifuentes (ed.), Estudios de Lingüística Cognitiva (pp. 429–440). Alicante: Universidad de Alicante, Servicio de Publicaciones.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seto, K. (1999). Distinguishing metonymy from synecdoche. In K. -U. Panther & G. Radden (eds.), Metonymy in Language and Thought (pp. 91–120). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). Metonymic polysemy and its place in meaning extension. In B. Nerlich, Z. Todd, V. Herman & D. D. Clarke (eds.), Polysemy: Flexible Patterns of Meaning in Mind and Language (pp. 195–214). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A. & Gries, S. Th. (eds.). (2006). Corpus-Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue