Cover not available

Article published In: Review of Cognitive Linguistics: Online-First Articles

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Theoretical and methodological issues in the identification of metaphorical language

ORCiD logo with link | University of Debrecen
Published online: 20 January 2026
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00251.cse
Abstract
The study provides a critical overview of metaphor identification methodologies and suggests further improvements to one of the most common procedures known as MIPVU. It presents the theoretical background to two major tasks of metaphor identification: the segmentation of text into linguistic units and determining their metaphoricity. The latter includes the demarcation of senses and the specification of source and target domain meanings. Difficulties involved in annotation include the establishment of boundaries to delimit metaphorical meaning-carrying elements, metaphoricity associated with word sequences rather than individual lexis, the treatment of compounds, particles and nominal inflections, as well as conflating or overlapping sense descriptions in the dictionary. Many of these issues are illustrated with a detailed analysis of Hungarian examples. A flexible but principled application of the procedure is recommended depending on the specific research agenda. The study advocates the utilization of the notion of decomposability in determining the metaphorical status of idiom-internal words and suggests a modification in MIPVU’s treatment of compounds. Decisions taken early in the process of metaphor analysis have repercussions in later stages when source domains and mappings are identified or quantitative analysis is conducted.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical considerations
    • 2.1The unit of analysis: Words, phrases or morphemes
    • 2.2The nature of metaphorical meaning
    • 2.3The use of a dictionary
  • 3.Practical considerations
    • 3.1The unit of analysis: Problems and solutions
      • 3.1.1Compounds
      • 3.1.2Idioms
      • 3.1.3Inflections
      • 3.1.4Preverbs
    • 3.2The dictionary: Problems and solutions
      • 3.2.1Dated senses and conflation
      • 3.2.2Simplified sense description
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
References (77)
References
A morfoszintaktikai kódok rendszere [The system of morpho-syntactic codes]. HUN-REN Nyelvtudományi Kutatóközpont, Nyelvtechnológai kutatócsoport. Retrieved December 27, 2024, from [URL]
Alkhammash, Reem. (2022). Processing figurative language: Evidence from native and non-native speakers of English. Frontiers in Psychology, 131, Article 1057662. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Badryzlova, Yulia, Shekhtman, Natalia, Isaeva, Yekaterina, & Kerimov, Ruslan. (2013). Annotating a Russian corpus of conceptual metaphor: a bottom-up approach. In Shutova, Ekaterina, Beata Beigman Klebanov, Joel Tetreault & Zornitsa Kozareva (Eds.), Proceedings of the First Workshop on Metaphor in NLP (pp. 77–86). Association for Computational Linguistics. [URL]
Bárdosi, Vilmos (Ed.). (2003). Magyar szólástár [Hungarian Idiom Dictionary]. Budapest: Tinta.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benkő, Loránd (Ed.). (1967–1976). A magyar nyelv történeti-etimológiai szótára I–III [The Historical-Etymological Dictionary of the Hungarian Language I–III]. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bogetić, Ksenija, Broćić, Andrijana, & Rasulić, Katarina. (2019). Linguistic metaphor identification in Serbian. In Nacey, Susan, Aletta G. Dorst, Tina Krennmayr, & W. Gudrun Reijnierse (Eds.), Metaphor Identification in Multiple Languages: MIPVU around the World (pp. 203–226). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cameron, Lynne. (2010). The discourse dynamics framework for metaphor. In Cameron, Lynne & Robert Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor Analysis: Research Practice in Applied Linguistics, Social Sciences and the Humanities (pp. 77–94). London and Oakville: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cameron, Lynne, & Maslen, Robert. (2010). Identifying metaphors in discourse data. In Cameron, Lynne & Robert Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practice in Applied Linguistics, Social Sciences and the Humanities (pp. 97–115). Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chapetón-Castro, Claudia Marcela, & Verdaguer-Clavera, Isabel. (2012). Researching linguistic metaphor in native, non-native, and expert writing. In MacArthur, Fiona, José Luis Oncins-Martínez, Manuel Sánchez-García & Ana María Piquer-Píriz (Eds.), Metaphor in use: Context, culture, and communication (pp. 149–173). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, William. (2001). Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, William, & Cruse, D. Alan. (2004). Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cserép, Attila. (2012). Idiom analyzability: an intuition-based study. In Pamies, Antonio, José Manuel Pazos Bretaña, & Lucía Luque Nadal (Eds.), Phraseology and discourse: Cross linguistic and corpus-based approaches (pp. 143–163). Schneider Verlag Hohengehren.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cserép, Attila, & Narimanishvili, Tamari. (2022). Challenges of metaphor identification in L2 essays. Argumentum, 181, 35–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Backer, Laurence, Enghels, Renata, & Goethals, Patrick. (2023). Metaphor analysis meets lexical strings: finetuning the metaphor identification procedure for quantitative semantic analyses. Frontiers in Psychology, 141, Article 1214699. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dorst, Aletta G., & Kaal, Anna. (2012). Metaphor in discourse: Beyond the boundaries of MIP. In MacArthur, Fiona, José Luis Oncins-Martínez, Manuel Sánchez-García & Ana María Piquer-Píriz (Eds.), Metaphor in use: Context, culture, and communication (pp. 51–68). John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan. (2005). The meaning of time: Polysemy, the lexicon and conceptual structure. Journal of Linguistics, 41(1), 33–75. [URL].
Gerstner, Károly (Ed.). (2011–2024). Új magyar etimológiai szótár [New Hungarian Etymological Dictionary]. Budapest: Nyelvtudományi Kutatóközpont. [URL]
Gibbs, Raymond W., Jr., & Nayak, Nandini P. (1989). Psycholinguistic studies on the syntactic behavior of idioms. Cognitive Psychology, 21(1), 100–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herrmann, Berenike J., Woll, Karola, & Dorst, Aletta G. (2019). Linguistic metaphor identification in German. In Nacey, Susan, Aletta G. Dorst, Tina Krennmayr & W. Gudrun Reijnierse (Eds.), Metaphor identification in multiple languages: MIPVU around the world (pp. 113–135). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ittzés, Nóra et al. (Ed.). (2006–). A magyar nyelv nagyszótára [The Comprehensive Dictionary of the Hungarian Language]. Online. [URL]
Johansson Falck, Marlene, & Okonski, Lacey. (2022). Procedure for Identifying Metaphorical Scenes (PIMS): A cognitive linguistics approach to bridge theory and practice. Cognitive Semantics, 8(2), 294–322. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2023). Procedure for Identifying Metaphorical Scenes (PIMS): The case of spatial and abstract relations. Metaphor and Symbol, 38(1), 1–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kalivoda, Ágnes. (2021). Igekötős szerkezetek a magyarban [Preverb Constructions in Hungarian]. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pázmány Péter Katolikus Egyetem]. Retrieved January 3, 2025, from [URL]
Kardos, Éva. (2016). Telicity marking in Hungarian. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 1(1), Article 41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaya, Sıla Gen. (2019). Linguistic metaphor identification in Uzbek. In Nacey, Susan, Aletta G. Dorst, Tina Krennmayr & W. Gudrun Reijnierse (Eds.), Metaphor identification in multiple languages: MIPVU around the world (pp. 227–245). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiefer, Ferenc. (2003). Alaktan [Morphology]. In Kiss, Katalin É., Ferenc Kiefer, & Péter Siptár. Új magyar nyelvtan [A New Hungarian Grammar] (pp. 189–283). Budapest: Osiris Kiadó.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klebanov, Beata Beigman, Leong, Chee Wee, & Flor, Michael. (2018). A corpus of non-native written English annotated for metaphor. In Walker, Marilyn, Heng Ji & Amanda Stent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 2 (Short Papers) (pp. 86–91). New Orleans, Louisiana: Association for Computational Linguistics. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ladányi, Mária. (2017). Alaktan [Morphology]. In Tolcsvai Nagy, Gábor (Ed.), Nyelvtan [Grammar] (pp. 503–660). Osiris Kiadó.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). Grammar and conceptualization. Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, Barbara. (2007). Polysemy, prototypes, and radial categories. In Geeraerts, Dirk & Hubert Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 139–169). Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Littlemore, Jeannette, Krennmayr, Tina, Turner, James, & Turner, Sarah. (2014). An investigation into metaphor use at different levels of second language writing. Applied Linguistics, 35(2), 117–144. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Longman. (n.d.). huge In Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English Online. Retrieved June 3, 2025, from [URL]
MacArthur, Fiona. (2019). Linguistic metaphor identification in English as a lingua franca. In Nacey, Susan, Aletta G. Dorst, Tina Krennmayr & W. Gudrun Reijnierse (Eds.), Metaphor identification in multiple languages: MIPVU around the world (pp. 289–312). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Magyar Nemzeti Szövegtár v2.0.5. [Hungarian Gigaword Corpus]. (1998–2023). HUN-REN Nyelvtudományi Kutatóközpont, Nyelvtechnológai kutatócsoport. (HGC) [URL]
Marhula, Joanna, & Rosiński, Maciej. (2019). Linguistic metaphor identification in Polish. In Nacey, Susan, Aletta G. Dorst, Tina Krennmayr & W. Gudrun Reijnierse (Eds.), Metaphor identification in multiple languages: MIPVU around the world (pp. 183–202). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nacey, Susan, Greve, Linda, & Johansson Falck, Marlene. (2019a). Linguistic metaphor identification in Scandinavian. In Nacey, Susan, Aletta G. Dorst, Tina Krennmayr & W. Gudrun Reijnierse (Eds.), Metaphor identification in multiple languages: MIPVU around the world (pp. 137–158). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nacey, Susan, Dorst, Aletta G., Krennmayr, Tina, & Reijnierse, W. Gudrun (Eds.). (2019b). Metaphor identification in multiple languages: MIPVU around the world. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Narimanishvili, Tamari. (2024). An overview of research methodologies for metaphor identification: A case study of the Georgian EFL essay corpus. Argumentum, 201, 19–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nikiforidou, Kiki. (1991). The meanings of the genitive: A case study in semantic structure and semantic change. Cognitive Linguistics, 2(2), 149–205. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nordmann, Emily, Cleland, Alexandra A., & Bull, Rebecca. (2014). Familiarity breeds dissent: Reliability analyses for British-English idioms on measures of familiarity, meaning, literality, and decomposability. Acta Psychologica, 1491, 87–95. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nunberg, Geoffrey D. (1978). The Pragmatics of reference. Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paradis, Carita. (2015). Conceptual spaces at work in sensory cognition: Domains, dimensions and distances. In Zenker, Frank & Peter Gärdenfors (Eds.), Applications of conceptual spaces: The case for geometric knowledge representation (pp. 32–55). Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paradis, Carita, & Eeg-Olofsson, Mats. (2013). Describing sensory experience: The genre of wine reviews. Metaphor and Symbol, 28(1), 22–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pasma, Tryntje. (2019). Linguistic metaphor identification in Dutch. In Nacey, Susan, Aletta G. Dorst, Tina Krennmayr & W. Gudrun Reijnierse (Eds.), Metaphor identification in multiple languages: MIPVU around the world (pp. 91–112). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Patterson, Katie J. (2016). The analysis of metaphor: To what extent can the theory of lexical priming help our understanding of metaphor usage and comprehension? Journal of Psycholinguist Research, 451, 237–258. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017a). When is a metaphor not a metaphor? An investigation into lexical characteristics of metaphoricity among uncertain cases. Metaphor and Symbol, 32(2), 103–117. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017b). Lexical priming and metaphor — Evidence of nesting in metaphoric language. In Pace-Sigge, Michael & Katie J. Patterson (Eds.), Lexical priming: Applications and advances (pp. 141–161). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pragglejaz Group. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pusztai, Ferenc (Ed.). (2003). Magyar értelmező kéziszótár [Concise Hungarian Explanatory Dictionary]. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó. [URL]
Rakova, Marina. (2003). The extent of the literal: Metaphor, polysemy and theories of concepts. Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rundell, Michael (Ed.). (2002). Macmillan English Dictionary for Advanced Learners. Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seepheephe, Nts’oeu Raphael, Ekanjume-Ilongo, Beatrice, & Thuube, Motlalepula Raphael. (2019). Linguistic metaphor identification in Sesotho. In Nacey, Susan, Aletta G. Dorst, Tina Krennmayr & W. Gudrun Reijnierse (Eds.), Metaphor identification in multiple languages: MIPVU around the world (pp. 267–287). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Semino, Elena. (2019). Afterword: Some reflections on MIPVU across languages. In Nacey, Susan, Aletta G. Dorst, Tina Krennmayr & W. Gudrun Reijnierse (Eds.), Metaphor identification in multiple languages: MIPVU around the world (pp. 313–321). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shutova, Ekaterina, Devereux, Barry J., & Korhonen, Anna. (2013). Conceptual metaphor theory meets the data: A corpus-based human annotation study. Language Resources and Evaluation, 47(4), 1261–1284. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simon, Gábor, Bajzát, Tímea, Ballagó, Júlia, Havasi, Zsuzsanna, Roskó, Mira, & Szlávich, Eszter. (2019). Metaforaazonosítás magyar nyelvű szövegekben: egy módszer adaptálásáról [Metaphor identification in Hungarian texts: a methodological adaptation]. Magyar Nyelvőr 143(2), 223–247. [URL]
Simon, Gábor, Bajzát, Tímea, Ballagó, Júlia, Havasi, Zsuzsanna, Molnár, Emese K., & Szlávich, Eszter. (2023). When MIPVU goes to no man’s land: A new language resource for hybrid, morpheme-based metaphor identification in Hungarian. Language Resources & Evaluation, [Published online] Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Speed, Laura J., O’Meara, Carolyn, San Roque, Lila, & Majid, Asifa (Eds.). (2019). Perception metaphors. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steen, Gerard. (2017). Identifying metaphors in language. In Semino, Elena & Zsófia Demjén (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language (pp. 73–87). Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steen, Gerard J., Dorst, Aletta G., Herrmann, J. Berenike, Kaal, Anna A., Krennmayr, Tina, & Pasma, Trijntje. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strik Lievers, Francesca. (2017). Figures and the senses: Towards a definition of synaesthesia. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 15(1), 83–101. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szili, Katalin. (2009). A fel, le és egyéb igekötős igék formai-szemantikai viszonyának kérdéséhez [On the question of formal-semantic relationship between verbs with fel, le and other particles]. Magyar Nyelv, 105(2), 175–188. [URL]
Tolcsvai Nagy, Gábor. (2013). Az igekötő + ige szerkezet szemantikája [The semantics of the preverb + verb construction]. Nyelvtudományi Közlemények, 1091, 187–226. [URL]
. (2017). Jelentéstan [Semantics]. In Tolcsvai Nagy, Gábor (Ed.), Nyelvtan [Grammar] (pp. 207–466). Osiris Kiadó.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2021). A fel igekötős igék konstrukciói: Kognitív szemantikai elemzés [Constructions of particle verbs with fel: A cognitive semantic analysis]. Argumentum, 171, 418–436. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tóth, Máté. (2022). A szinesztéziás kifejezések fogalmi hátteréről [On the conceptual background to synaesthetic expressions]. Argumentum, 181, 439–452. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tóth, Máté, Csatár, Péter, & Majoros, Krisztián. (2018). Metaphoric representations of the migration crisis in Hungarian online newspapers: A first approximation. metaphorik.de, 28(2018), 169–199. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tyler, Andrea, & Evans, Vyvyan. (2003). The Semantics of English Prepositions: Spatial Scenes, Embodied Meaning and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Urbonaitė, Justina, Šeškauskienė, Inesa & Cibulskienė, Jurga. (2019). Linguistic metaphor identification in Lithuanian. In Nacey, Susan, Aletta G. Dorst, Tina Krennmayr & W. Gudrun Reijnierse (Eds.), Metaphor identification in multiple languages: MIPVU around the world (pp.159–181). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Veale, Tony, Shutova, Ekaterina, & Klebanov, Beata Beigman. (2016). Metaphor: A computational perspective. Morgan & Claypool. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Werkmann Horvat, Ana, Bolognesi, Marianna, & Kohl, Katrin. (2021). The status of conventional metaphorical meaning in the L2 lexicon. Intercultural Pragmatics, 18(4), 447–467. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zaicz, Gábor (Ed.). (2006). Etimológiai szótár: Magyar szavak és toldalékok eredete [Etymological Dictionary: The origin of Hungarian words and affixes]. Tinta Könyvkiadó. [URL]
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue