Cover not available

Article published In: Review of Cognitive Linguistics: Online-First Articles

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Conceptual overlap and multiple symbolization in signed languages

 | University of New Mexico
 | Federal University of Parana
 | University of Buenos Aires
Published online: 20 January 2026
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00247.wil
Abstract
In this paper we explore conceptual overlap in two signed languages. Our data comes from natural discourse in Brazilian Sign Language (Libras) and Argentine Sign Language (LSA). Our analysis relies on theoretical constructs derived from cognitive grammar, which posits just three core elements: semantic structures, phonological structures, and symbolic structures which are associations of the first two. Signed languages use symbolic structures we call Places to conceptualize space in signed discourse. We show that one way signed languages express conceptual overlap is with phonological overlap: placing signs at the same spatial location. Our data demonstrates how Places establish nominal referents and discourse topics, create associations among referents, and structure the flow of information. We also offer an account of agreement as a type of conceptual overlap expressed by phonological overlap. A currently popular account of agreement in signed languages argues that these expressions consist of “fusions” of language and gesture. Our account relies solely on linguistic elements and is compatible with that of agreement as multiple symbolization.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Conceptual overlap
  • 2.Cognitive grammar and signed languages
    • 2.1The elements of signed language phonology are conceptual entities
    • 2.2Place as a symbolic structure
    • 2.3Placing constructions
    • 2.4Pointing constructions
  • 3.Conceptual overlap in signed discourse
    • 3.1Conceptual overlap and reference points
    • 3.2Conceptual overlap and the flow of information
    • 3.3Agreement as multiple symbolization
  • 4.Conclusions and implications for future research
  • Notes
  • References
References (58)
References
Barlow, Michael. (1999). Agreement as a discourse phenomenon. Folia Linguistica, 33(1–2), 187–210. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borges, Jorge L. (1954). Funes, the Memorious. In Avon Modern Writing No. 2 (pp. 148–154). Avon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. (1987). Cognitive constraints on information flow. In R. S. Tomlin (Ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse (pp. 21–51). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. (2003). Pointing and placing. In Kita, Sotaro (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meet (pp. 243–268). Psychology Press. [URL]
Cooperrider, Kensy, Slotta, James, & Núñez, Rafael. (2018). The preference for pointing with the Hand Is Not Universal. Cogn Sci, 42(4), 1375–1390. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville. (2006). Agreement. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, William. (2001). Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2013). Agreement as anaphora, anaphora as coreference. In Bakker, Dik & Martin Haspelmath (Eds.), Languages across boundaries: Studies in memory of Anna Siewierska (pp. 107–129). De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Declerck, Mathieu, & Philipp, Andrea M. (2015). The unusual suspect: Influence of phonological overlap on language control. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(4), 726–736. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Douven, Igor, Elqayam, Shira, Gärdenfors, Peter, & Mirabile, Patricia. (2022). Conceptual spaces and the strength of similarity-based arguments. Cognition: International Journal of Cognitive Science, 2181, 104951. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dudis, Paul G. (2004). Body partitioning and real-space blends. Cognitive Linguistics, 151, 223–238. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Edelman, Gerald M. (1987). Neural Darwinism: The theory of neuronal group selection. Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, Susan D., & Gough, Bonnie. (1978). Verbs in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 71, 17–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fowler, Carol A. (2006). Compensation for coarticulation reflects gesture perception, not spectral contrast. Perception & Psychophysics, 681, 161–177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gopnik, Alison, & Meltzoff, Andrew. (1987). The development of categorization in the second year and its relation to other cognitive and linguistic developments. Child Development, 1523–1531. [URL]
Hou, Lynn. (2022a). A usage-based proposal for argument structure of directional verbs in American Sign Language. Frontiers in Psychology, 131. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2022b). LOOKing for multi-word expressions in American Sign Language. Cognitive Linguistics, 33(2), 291–337. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2019). Shared spaces, shared mind: Connecting past and present viewpoints in American Sign Language narratives. Cognitive Linguistics, 30(2), 253–279. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Janzen, Terry, Shaffer, Barbara, & Leeson, Lorraine. (2023). What I know is here; what I don’t know is somewhere else: Deixis and gesture spaces in American Sign Language and Irish Sign Language. In Janzen, Terry & Barbara Shaffer (Eds.), Signed language and gesture research in cognitive linguistics (Vol. 671, pp. 211–242). De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Janzen, Terry, Shaffer, Barbara, & Wilcox, Sherman. (2000). Signed language pragmatics. In Verschueren, Jef, Jan-Ola Östman, Jan Blommaert & Chris Bulcaen (Eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics (pp. 1–20). John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jarque, Maria Josep. (2016). What about? In Pascual, Esther & Sergeiy Sandler (Eds.), The Conversation Frame: Forms and functions of fictive interaction (pp. 171–192). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kibrik, Andrej A. (2019). Rethinking agreement: Cognition-to-form mapping. Cognitive Linguistics, 30(1), 37–83. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar: Volume I, Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1993). Reference-point constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 41, 1–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). Grammar and conceptualization. Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001a). Discourse in cognitive grammar. Cognitive Linguistics, 121, 143–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001b). Topic, subject, and possessor. In Simonsen, Hanne G. & Rolf T. Endresen (Eds.), A cognitive approach to the verb: Morphological and constructional perspectives (pp. 11–48). Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Investigations in cognitive grammar (Vol. 421). Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2023). Structure, iconicity, and access. In Janzen, Terry & Barbara Shaffer (Eds.), Signed language and gesture research in cognitive linguistics (Vol. 671, pp. 105–126). De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liddell, Scott K. (2003). Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liddell, Scott K., & Johnson, Robert E. (2019). Sign language articulators on phonetic bearings. Sign Language Studies, 20(1), 132–172. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lillo-Martin, Diane, & Meier, Richard P. (2011). On the linguistic status of ‘agreement’ in sign languages. Theoretical Linguistics, 37(3/4), 95–141. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martínez, Rocío, & Wilcox, Sherman. (2019). Pointing and placing: Nominal grounding in Argentine Sign Language. Cognitive Linguistics, 30(1), 85–121. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Massone, María Ignacia, Rocío Anabel Martínez, Bárbara Carboni, & Mariana Marchese. (2012). Curso de Lengua de Señas Argentina. La etnografía como punto de partida epistemológico y metodológico. Cultura Sorda.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meier, Richard P., & Lillo-Martin, Diane. (2013). The points of language. Humana.Mente Journal of Philosophical Studies, 241, 151–176.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meir, Irit, Padden, Carol A., Aronoff, Mark, & Sandler, Wendy. (2007). Body as subject. Journal of Linguistics, 431, 531–563. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nilsson, Anna-Lena. (2016). Embodying metaphors: Signed language interpreters at work. Cognitive Linguistics, 271, 35–65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nurmi, Petteri & Johan Koolwaaij. (2006). Identifying meaningful locations. In Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Networking & Services, 2006 Third Annual International Conference on (pp. 1–8). IEEE. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Padden, Carol A. (1988). Interaction of morphology and syntax in American Sign Language. Garland Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pfau, Roland, Salzmann, Martin, & Steinbach, Markus. (2018). The syntax of sign language agreement: Common ingredients, but unusual recipe. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 3(1), 1–46. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Potì, Patrizia. (1996). Spatial aspects of spontaneous object grouping by young chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). International Journal of Primatology, 17(1), 101–116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quer, Josep. (2011). When agreeing to disagree is not enough: Further arguments for the linguistic status of sign language agreement. Theoretical Linguistics, 371, 189–196. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schembri, Adam, Cormier, Kearsy, & Fenlon, Jordan. (2018). Indicating verbs as typologically unique constructions: Reconsidering verb ‘agreement’ in sign languages. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 3(1), 1–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shaffer, Barbara, Leeson, Lorraine, & Janzen, Terry. (2018). What I know is here; what I don’t know is somewhere else: Deixis and gesture spaces in American Sign Language and Irish Sign Language. In Proceedings from International Society of Gesture Studies. Cape Town, South Africa.
Siyavoshi, Sara, & Wilcox, Sherman. (2021). Exerting control: the grammatical meaning of facial displays in signed languages. Cognitive Linguistics, 32(4), 609–639. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan I. (1985). The child as a linguistic icon-maker. In J. Haiman (Ed.), Iconicity in syntax (pp. 221–248). John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steel, Susan. (1978). Word order variation: A typological survey. In J. H. Greenberg, C. A. Ferguson, & E. A. Moravcsik (Eds.), Universals of Human Language: IV: Syntax (pp. 585–623). Stanford Universitiy Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stokoe, William C. (1960). Sign language structure: An outline of the visual communication systems of the American deaf (Vol. 8 Studies in Linguistics Occasional Papers). University of Buffalo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stokoe, William C., Casterline, D., & Croneberg, C. (1965). A dictionary of American Sign Language on linguistic principles. Gallaudet College Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilcox, Sherman, & Martínez, Rocío. (2020). The conceptualization of space: Places in signed language discourse. Frontiers in Psychology. 111:1406. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilcox, Sherman, Martínez, Rocío, & Morales, Diego. (2022). The conceptualization of space in signed languages: Placing the signer in narratives. In A. Jucker & H. Hausendorf (Eds.), Pragmatics of space (pp. 63–94). Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilcox, Sherman, & Occhino, Corrine. (2016). Constructing signs: Place as a symbolic structure in signed languages. Cognitive Linguistics, 271, 371–404. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilcox, Sherman, Xavier, André N., & Siltaloppi, Satu. (2023). List constructions in two signed languages. Language & Cognition, 1–36. [URL]
Winston, Elizabeth. (1995). Spatial mapping in comparative discourse frames. In Emmorey, Karen & Judy S. Reilly (Eds.), Language, gesture, and space (pp. 87–114). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zima, Elisabeth, & Bergs, Alexander. (2017). Multimodality and construction grammar. Linguistics Vanguard, 3(s1), 1–9. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue