References (61)
References
Akita, K., & Parudeshi, P. (Eds.). (2019). Ideophones, mimetics and expressives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bańko, M. (2008). Współczesny polski onomatopeikon. Ikoniczność w języku. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barcelona, A. (2012). Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (Vol. 301). Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bergen, B. K. (Ed.). (2012). Louder than words: The new science of how the mind makes meaning. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bertelson, P. (1999). Ventriloquism: A case of cross-modal perceptual grouping. In G. Aschersleben, T. Bachmann & J. Músseler (Eds.), Cognitive contributions to the perception of spatial and temporal events (pp. 347–317). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Botvinick, M., & Cohen, J. (1998). Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see. Nature (London), 391(6669), 756–756. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Calvert, G. A. (2001). Crossmodal processing in the human brain: insights from functional neuroimaging studies. Cerebral Cortex (New York, N.Y. 1991), 11(12), 1110–1123. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chesnokova, L. D. (Ed.) (1991). Russkiy yazyk: trudnyye sluchai morfologicheskogo razbora: uchebnoye posobiye dlya studentov filologov [The Russian language: difficult cases of morphological analysis]. Moskva: Vysshaya shkola.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dalton, P., Doolittle, N., Nagata, H., & Breslin, P. A. S. (2000). The merging of the senses: Integration of subthreshold taste and smell. Nature Neuroscience, 3(5), 431–432. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dingemanse, M. (2012). Advances in the cross-linguistic study of ideophones. Language and Linguistics Compass, 6(10), 654–672. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dingemanse, M., & Majid, A. (2012). The semantic structure of sensory vocabulary in an African language. In N. Miyake, D. Peebles & R. P. Cooper (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 300–305). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Efremova, T. F. (Ed.) (2000). Novyy slovar’ russkogo yazyka. Tolkovo slovoobrazovatel’nyy [The new dictionary of the Russian language: explanatory and word-formation]. Moskva: Russkiy yazyk.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fábregas, A. (2015). Una nota sobre la expresión icónica del aspecto léxico en las onomatopeyas [A note about the iconic expression of lexical aspect in onomatopoeia]. Lenguas modernas (Santiago), 451, 39–57.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gick, B., & Derrick, D. (2009). Aero-tactile integration in speech perception. Nature (London), 462(7272), 502–504. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldstein, E. B. (Ed.) (2010). Encyclopedia of perception. Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Griffiths, T. D., & Warren, J. D. (2004). What is an auditory object? Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 5(11), 887–892. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ho, H.-N., Van Doorn, G. H., Kawabe, T., Watanabe, J., & Spence, C. (2014). Colour-temperature correspondences: When reactions to thermal stimuli are influenced by colour. PloS One, 9(3), e91854–e91854. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iida, H., & Akita, K. (2023). Perceptual strength norms for 510 Japanese words, including ideophones: a comparative study with English. In M. Goldwater, F. K. Anggoro, B. K. Hayes & D. C. Ong (Eds.), Proceedings of the 45th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2201–2207). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society. [URL]
Jääskeläinen, A. (2013). Todisteena äänen kuva: suomen kielen imitatiivikonstruktiot. Helsinki: Unigrafia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kanerva, O. (2018). Correlation between expressiveness and syntactic independence of Russian onomatopoeic verbal interjections. Poljarnyj Vestnik: Norwegian Journal of Slavic Studies, 211, 15–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kanerva, O. A. (2020). Russian onomatopoeic verbal interjections. Why use ‘non-words’ instead of ordinary ones? RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. ‘Literary Theory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies’ Series 71, 130–146. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kartsevskiy, S. O. (1984). Vvedeniye v izucheniye mezhdometiy [Introduction to the study of interjections]. Voprosy yazykoznaniya, 61, 127–137.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kassambara, A., & Mundt, F. (2020). Factoextra: Extract and visualize the results of multivariate data analyses. R package version 1.0.7. [URL]
Kor Chahine, I. (2008). Plyukh! ― plyukh ― plyukhnut’(sya). K voprosu ob evolyutsii narrativnykh predikatov v svete korpusnykh dannykh. [Plyukh! → plyukh → plyukhnut’(sja). On the evolution of narrative predicates in the light of corpus data]. In A. Mustajoki, M. V. Kopotev, L. A. Biryulin & E.Yu. Protasova (Eds.), Instrumentariy rusistiki: korpusnyye podkhody [Tools of Russian studies: corpus-based approaches] (pp. 152–162). Helsinki: Department of Slavonic and Baltic Languages and Literatures.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Körtvélyessy, L., & Štekauer, P. (Eds.). (2024). Onomatopoeia in the world’s languages: a comparative handbook. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter, Inc. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kubovy, M., & Van Valkenburg, D. (2001). Auditory and visual objects. Cognition, 80(1), 97–126. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kulemeka, A. T. (1995). Sound symbolic and grammatical frameworks: a typology of ideophones in Asian and African languages. South African Journal of African Languages, 15(2), 73–84. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leont’yev, A. A. (1997). Osnovy psikholingvistiki [Foundations of Psycholinguistics]. Moskva: Smysl.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lynott, D., & Connell, L. (2009). Modality exclusivity norms for 423 object properties. Behavior Research Methods, 41(2), 558–564. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maechler, M., Rousseeuw, P., Struyf, A., Hubert, M., & Hornik, K. (2022). cluster: cluster analysis basics and extensions. R package version 2.1.4. [URL]
McGurk, H., & MacDonald, J. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature (London), 264(5588), 746–748. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McLean, B. (2021). Revising an implicational hierarchy for the meanings of ideophones, with special reference to Japonic. Linguistic Typology, 25(3), 507–549. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miklashevsky, A. (2018). Perceptual experience norms for 506 Russian nouns: modality rating, spatial localization, manipulability, imageability and other variables. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 47(3), 641–661. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mkhitar’yan, G. S. (2016). Grammaticheskiy status i funktsionirovaniye glagol’no-mezhdometnykh form v sovremennom russkom yazyke [Grammatical status and functioning of verbal interjectional forms in contemporary Russian]. Pyatigorsk.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nikitina, T. (2012). Russian verboids: A case study in expressive vocabulary. Linguistics, 50(2), 165–189. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nudds, M. (2001). Experiencing the production of sounds. European Journal of Philosophy, 9(2), 210–229. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Callaghan, C. (2007). Sounds: A philosophical theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Lessons from beyond vision (sounds and audition). Philosophical Studies, 153(1), 143–160. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Core Team (2023). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL [URL]
Rakova, M. (Ed.). (2003). The extent of the literal: metaphor, polysemy and theories of concepts. Palgrave Macmillan UK. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rhodes, R. (1994). Aural images. In L. Hinton, J. Nichols & J. J. Ohala (Eds.), Sound symbolism (pp. 276–292). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rowland, B. A., Quessy, S., Stanford, T. R., & Stein, B. E. (2007). Multisensory integration shortens physiological response latencies. The Journal of Neuroscience, 27(22), 5879–5884. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shams, L., Kamitani, Y., & Shimojo, S. (2002). Visual illusion induced by sound. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, 14(1), 147–152. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shvedova, N. Yu. (Ed.) (1980). Russkaya grammatika [Russian Grammar]. Moskva: Nauka.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spence, C. (2020). Temperature-based crossmodal correspondences: causes and consequences. Multisensory Research, 33(6), 645–682. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spence, C., Senkowski, D., & Röder, B. (2009). Crossmodal processing. Experimental Brain Research, 198(2–3), 107–111. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stanford, T. R., & Stein, B. E. (2007). Superadditivity in multisensory integration: putting the computation in context. Neuroreport, 18(8), 787–792. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stanford, T. R., Quessy, S., & Stein, B. E. (2005). Evaluating the operations underlying multisensory integration in the cat superior colliculus. The Journal of Neuroscience, 25(28), 6499–6508. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stein, B. E., & Meredith, M. A. (1993). Merging of the senses. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strik Lievers, F., Huang, C-R., & Xiong, J. (2021). Linguistic synaesthesia. In J. R. Taylor & X. Wen (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 372–383). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Svantesson, J. (2017). Sound symbolism: the role of word sound in meaning. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Cognitive Science, 8(5), e1441-n/a. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Hoey, Th. (2022). A semantic map for ideophones. In Th. F. Li (Ed.), Handbook of Cognitive Semantics. Leiden: Brill. Preprint. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Viimaranta, J., & Kanerva, O. (2024). The uses of the Russian onomatopoeic interjection bats ‘bam, bang.’ Studia z filologii polskiej i słowiańskiej, 59, Article 3278. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Viimaranta, J., & Vihervä, M. (2019). The use of onomatopoeic interjections in predicate function in Russian and other languages: A perspective from the corpus of parallel texts of the Russian national corpus. Scando-Slavica, 65(2), 239–262. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Voeltz, E. F. K., & Kilian-Hatz, C. (Eds.). (2001). Ideophones. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vroomen, J., & De Gelder, B. (2004). Perceptual effects of cross-modal stimulation: Ventriloquism and the freezing phenomenon. In G. A. Calvert, C. Spence & B. E. Stein (Eds.), Handbook of multisensory processes (pp. 141–176). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag. [URL].
Wickham, H., François, R., Henry, L., Müller, K., & Vaughan, D. (2023). dplyr: a grammar of data manipulation. R package version 1.1.4. [URL]
Xu, M. (2020). The repetition of Chinese onomatopoeia. In Y. Zhang, P. Liu & J.-F. Hong (Eds.), Chinese lexical semantics (Vol. 118311, pp. 173–179). Springer International Publishing AG. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue