Article published In: Review of Cognitive Linguistics: Online-First Articles
Multisensory and synaesthetic features in Russian onomatopoeias
Published online: 11 December 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00246.kan
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00246.kan
Abstract
This study investigates whether Russian onomatopoeias can generate multisensory mental imagery and evoke
synaesthetic sensations going beyond sound depiction. The experiment with Russian native speakers identified six word clusters
linked to a specific set of sensory associations involved in depicting extralinguistic phenomena: (1) words reflecting delicate
body movements with moderate kinetic and subtle visual and auditory sensations; (2) one word referring to flatulence formed its
own cluster triggering strong auditory, olfactory and kinetic sensations; (3) words depicting food consumption uniquely activated
associations with taste; (4) words linked to movements evoked strong visual and kinetic sensations with no auditory focus;
(5) words representing environmental sounds spatially remote from the observer triggered auditory, visual and kinetic sensations;
(6) words for human bodily sounds generated auditory, visual and kinetic sensations, with tactile and interoceptive implications.
The results indicate that Russian onomatopoeias elicit vivid, multisensory mental imagery, some with synaesthetic properties, akin
to ideophones.
Keywords: onomatopoeia, Russian, synaesthesia, multimodal sensations, ideophones
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Previous research
- 1.2The present study
- 2.Methods
- 2.1Experiment: Sensory modality rating
- 2.1.1Participants
- 2.1.2Material
- 2.1.3Procedure
- 2.2Analysis
- 2.2.1Data preparation
- 2.2.2Statistical analysis
- 2.1Experiment: Sensory modality rating
- 3.Results
- 4.Discussion
- 5.Conclusion
- Declaration of interest statement
- Data availability statement
- CRediT authorship contribution statement
- Appendix 1.
References
References (61)
Akita, K., & Parudeshi, P. (Eds.). (2019). Ideophones,
mimetics and expressives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bańko, M. (2008). Współczesny
polski onomatopeikon. Ikoniczność w
języku. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Barcelona, A. (2012). Metaphor
and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive
perspective (Vol. 301). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Bergen, B. K. (Ed.). (2012). Louder
than words: The new science of how the mind makes meaning. New York: Basic Books.
Bertelson, P. (1999). Ventriloquism:
A case of cross-modal perceptual grouping. In G. Aschersleben, T. Bachmann & J. Músseler (Eds.), Cognitive
contributions to the perception of spatial and temporal
events (pp. 347–317). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Botvinick, M., & Cohen, J. (1998). Rubber
hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see. Nature
(London), 391(6669), 756–756.
Calvert, G. A. (2001). Crossmodal
processing in the human brain: insights from functional neuroimaging studies. Cerebral Cortex
(New York, N.Y.
1991), 11(12), 1110–1123.
Chesnokova, L. D. (Ed.) (1991). Russkiy yazyk: trudnyye sluchai morfologicheskogo razbora: uchebnoye posobiye dlya studentov
filologov [The Russian language: difficult cases of morphological
analysis]. Moskva: Vysshaya shkola.
Dalton, P., Doolittle, N., Nagata, H., & Breslin, P. A. S. (2000). The
merging of the senses: Integration of subthreshold taste and smell. Nature
Neuroscience, 3(5), 431–432.
Dingemanse, M. (2012). Advances
in the cross-linguistic study of ideophones. Language and Linguistics
Compass, 6(10), 654–672.
Dingemanse, M., & Majid, A. (2012). The
semantic structure of sensory vocabulary in an African
language. In N. Miyake, D. Peebles & R. P. Cooper (Eds.), Proceedings
of the 34th annual conference of the Cognitive Science
Society (pp. 300–305). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Efremova, T. F. (Ed.) (2000). Novyy slovar’ russkogo yazyka. Tolkovo slovoobrazovatel’nyy [The new
dictionary of the Russian language: explanatory and
word-formation]. Moskva: Russkiy yazyk.
Fábregas, A. (2015). Una nota sobre la expresión icónica del aspecto léxico en las onomatopeyas [A note about the iconic expression of lexical aspect in onomatopoeia]. Lenguas
modernas
(Santiago), 451, 39–57.
Gick, B., & Derrick, D. (2009). Aero-tactile
integration in speech perception. Nature
(London), 462(7272), 502–504.
Griffiths, T. D., & Warren, J. D. (2004). What
is an auditory object? Nature Reviews.
Neuroscience, 5(11), 887–892.
Ho, H.-N., Van Doorn, G. H., Kawabe, T., Watanabe, J., & Spence, C. (2014). Colour-temperature
correspondences: When reactions to thermal stimuli are influenced by colour. PloS
One, 9(3), e91854–e91854.
Iida, H., & Akita, K. (2023). Perceptual
strength norms for 510 Japanese words, including ideophones: a comparative study with
English. In M. Goldwater, F. K. Anggoro, B. K. Hayes & D. C. Ong (Eds.), Proceedings
of the 45th annual conference of the Cognitive Science
Society (pp. 2201–2207). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society. [URL]
Jääskeläinen, A. (2013). Todisteena
äänen kuva: suomen kielen
imitatiivikonstruktiot. Helsinki: Unigrafia.
Kanerva, O. (2018). Correlation
between expressiveness and syntactic independence of Russian onomatopoeic verbal
interjections. Poljarnyj Vestnik: Norwegian Journal of Slavic
Studies, 211, 15–30.
Kanerva, O. A. (2020). Russian onomatopoeic verbal interjections. Why use ‘non-words’ instead of ordinary ones? RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. ‘Literary Theory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies’ Series 71, 130–146.
Kartsevskiy, S. O. (1984). Vvedeniye v izucheniye mezhdometiy [Introduction to the study
of interjections]. Voprosy
yazykoznaniya, 61, 127–137.
Kassambara, A., & Mundt, F. (2020). Factoextra:
Extract and visualize the results of multivariate data analyses. R package version 1.0.7. [URL]
Kor Chahine, I. (2008). Plyukh! ― plyukh ― plyukhnut’(sya). K voprosu ob evolyutsii narrativnykh predikatov v svete korpusnykh
dannykh. [Plyukh! → plyukh → plyukhnut’(sja). On the evolution of narrative
predicates in the light of corpus data]. In A. Mustajoki, M. V. Kopotev, L. A. Biryulin & E.Yu. Protasova (Eds.), Instrumentariy rusistiki: korpusnyye podkhody [Tools of Russian
studies: corpus-based
approaches] (pp. 152–162). Helsinki: Department of Slavonic and Baltic Languages and Literatures.
Körtvélyessy, L., & Štekauer, P. (Eds.). (2024). Onomatopoeia
in the world’s languages: a comparative handbook. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter, Inc.
Kulemeka, A. T. (1995). Sound
symbolic and grammatical frameworks: a typology of ideophones in Asian and African
languages. South African Journal of African
Languages, 15(2), 73–84.
Leont’yev, A. A. (1997). Osnovy psikholingvistiki [Foundations of
Psycholinguistics]. Moskva: Smysl.
Lynott, D., & Connell, L. (2009). Modality
exclusivity norms for 423 object properties. Behavior Research
Methods, 41(2), 558–564.
Maechler, M., Rousseeuw, P., Struyf, A., Hubert, M., & Hornik, K. (2022). cluster:
cluster analysis basics and extensions. R package version 2.1.4. [URL]
McGurk, H., & MacDonald, J. (1976). Hearing
lips and seeing voices. Nature
(London), 264(5588), 746–748.
McLean, B. (2021). Revising
an implicational hierarchy for the meanings of ideophones, with special reference to
Japonic. Linguistic
Typology, 25(3), 507–549.
Miklashevsky, A. (2018). Perceptual
experience norms for 506 Russian nouns: modality rating, spatial localization, manipulability, imageability and other
variables. Journal of Psycholinguistic
Research, 47(3), 641–661.
Mkhitar’yan, G. S. (2016). Grammaticheskiy status i funktsionirovaniye glagol’no-mezhdometnykh form v sovremennom russkom
yazyke [Grammatical status and functioning of verbal interjectional forms in
contemporary Russian]. Pyatigorsk.
Nikitina, T. (2012). Russian verboids: A case study in expressive vocabulary. Linguistics, 50(2), 165–189.
Nudds, M. (2001). Experiencing
the production of sounds. European Journal of
Philosophy, 9(2), 210–229.
R Core Team (2023). R: a language and
environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL [URL]
Rakova, M. (Ed.). (2003). The
extent of the literal: metaphor, polysemy and theories of concepts. Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Rhodes, R. (1994). Aural
images. In L. Hinton, J. Nichols & J. J. Ohala (Eds.), Sound
symbolism (pp. 276–292). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rowland, B. A., Quessy, S., Stanford, T. R., & Stein, B. E. (2007). Multisensory
integration shortens physiological response latencies. The Journal of
Neuroscience, 27(22), 5879–5884.
Shams, L., Kamitani, Y., & Shimojo, S. (2002). Visual
illusion induced by sound. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain
Research, 14(1), 147–152.
Spence, C. (2020). Temperature-based
crossmodal correspondences: causes and consequences. Multisensory
Research, 33(6), 645–682.
Spence, C., Senkowski, D., & Röder, B. (2009). Crossmodal
processing. Experimental Brain
Research, 198(2–3), 107–111.
Stanford, T. R., & Stein, B. E. (2007). Superadditivity
in multisensory integration: putting the computation in
context. Neuroreport, 18(8), 787–792.
Stanford, T. R., Quessy, S., & Stein, B. E. (2005). Evaluating
the operations underlying multisensory integration in the cat superior colliculus. The Journal
of
Neuroscience, 25(28), 6499–6508.
Strik Lievers, F., Huang, C-R., & Xiong, J. (2021). Linguistic
synaesthesia. In J. R. Taylor & X. Wen (Eds.), The
Routledge handbook of cognitive
linguistics (pp. 372–383). Routledge.
Svantesson, J. (2017). Sound
symbolism: the role of word sound in meaning. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Cognitive
Science, 8(5), e1441-n/a.
Van Hoey, Th. (2022). A
semantic map for ideophones. In Th. F. Li (Ed.), Handbook
of Cognitive
Semantics. Leiden: Brill. Preprint.
Viimaranta, J., & Kanerva, O. (2024). The
uses of the Russian onomatopoeic interjection bats ‘bam, bang.’ Studia z filologii polskiej i
słowiańskiej, 59, Article 3278.
Viimaranta, J., & Vihervä, M. (2019). The
use of onomatopoeic interjections in predicate function in Russian and other languages: A perspective from the corpus of
parallel texts of the Russian national
corpus. Scando-Slavica, 65(2), 239–262.
Voeltz, E. F. K., & Kilian-Hatz, C. (Eds.). (2001). Ideophones. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Vroomen, J., & De Gelder, B. (2004). Perceptual
effects of cross-modal stimulation: Ventriloquism and the freezing
phenomenon. In G. A. Calvert, C. Spence & B. E. Stein (Eds.), Handbook
of multisensory
processes (pp. 141–176). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2:
Elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag. [URL].
Wickham, H., François, R., Henry, L., Müller, K., & Vaughan, D. (2023). dplyr:
a grammar of data manipulation. R package version 1.1.4. [URL]
Winter, B. (2019). Sensory
linguistics: Language, perception and
metaphor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.