References (30)
References
Abbi, A. (1990). Experiential constructions and the ‘Subjecthood’ of the experiencer NPs in South Asian languages. In Verma, M. K. Verma & K. P. Mohanan (Eds.), Experiencer subjects in South Asian languages (pp. 253–265). Stanford: CSLI publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Achard, M. (2015). Abstract locational subjects: Field and settings in French and English. In M-L. Helasvuo & T. Huumo (Eds.). Cognitive and interactional perspectives on noncanonical subjects (pp. 101–139). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Belletti, A., & Rizzi, L. (1988). Psych Verbs and θ-Theory. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 61, 291–352. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhaskararao, P., & Subbarao, K. V. (Eds.) (2004). Non-nominative subjects. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borah, G. K. (2011). Tense and aspect in Assamese: A few preliminary remarks. JDA, 2 (1). 1–8.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Bezbarua’s reflections on language. In M. M. Sarma & D. P. Nath (Eds), Lakshminath Bezbaroa: The architect of modern Assamese Literature (pp. 223–224). Tezpur: Tezpur University Publication.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butt, M. (2009). Modern approaches to case: An overview. In A. Malchukov & A. Spencer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of case (pp. 27–43). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, R. (2023). Figure-Ground in cognitive semantics. In F. T. Li (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive semantics (4/21., pp. 3–29). Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, V., & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive linguistics: An Introduction. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, B. (1997). Possession: Cognitive sources, forces, and grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, B., & T. Kuteva. (2002). Word lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Helasvuo, M-L., & Huumo, T. (Eds.). (2015). Subjects in constructions: Canonical and non-canonical. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ikegami, Y. (1991). ‘Do-language’ and ‘Become-language’: Two contrasting types of linguistic representation. In Yoshihiko Ikegami (Ed.), The empire of signs: Semiotic Essays on Japanese culture (pp. 285–326). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jokela, H., & Plado, H. (2015). Subject under generic conditions: Implied subjects in Finnish and Estonian if-clauses. In M-L. Helasvuo & T. Huumo (Eds.) Subjects in Constructions: Canonical and non-canonical (pp. 73–98). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar I. California: Standford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1991). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar Vol. II. California: Standford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Investigations in cognitive grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nath, D. K. (2013). Experiencer subject constructions and genitive case in Assamese. Research Scholar-An International Refereed e-Journal of Literary Explorations (RSIRJLE), 1(3), 1–9.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pajusalu, R. (2015). Hidden subjects in conversation: Estonian personless verb forms as referential devices. In M-L. Helasvuo & T. Huumo (Eds.) Subjects in constructions: Canonical and non-canonical (pp. 43–72). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Radden, G., & Dirven, R. (2007). Cognitive English Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sawarni, B. (2025). Conceptual and grammatical linking of clauses in Assamese and Mising: A comparative study [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Tezpur University.
Subbarao, K. V. (2012). South Asian languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (2000). Towards a Cognitive Semantics Vol. I: Concept Structuring Systems. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verma, M. K., & Mohanan, K. P. (Eds.). (1990). Experiencer subjects in South Asian Languages. Standford: CSLI publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yoon, J. H. (2004). Non-nominative subjects and case stacking in Korean. In P. Bhaskararao & K. V. Subbarao (Eds.), Non-nominative subjects (21., pp. 265–314). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue