Cover not available

Review published In: Aspects of Metaphor
Edited by Maria Theodoropoulou
[Review of Cognitive Linguistics 23:1] 2025
► pp. 320–326

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
Book review

Mokhtar Ounis. Unpacking metaphor-related prepositions in political discourse. New York: Routledge, 2024.

Reviewed by
 | Universitat Jaume I
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Open Access publication of this article was funded through a Transformative Agreement with Universitat Jaume I.

Published online: 13 January 2025
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00213.nav
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Chapters of the book
  • 3.Discussion
  • 4.Conclusion
  • References
References (16)
References
Al-Jurjani, Abd al-Qahir (1991). Asrar al-Balaghah [The mysteries of eloquence]. Jeddah KSA. Dar-Al-Madani.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coventry, K. R., & Garrod, S. C. (2004). Saying, seeing and acting: The psychological semantics of spatial prepositions. London: Psychology Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feist, M. I. (2000). On in and on : An investigation into the linguistic encoding of spatial scenes. Ph.D. dissertation. Evanston: Northwestern University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gärdenfors, P. (2015). The geometry of preposition meanings. Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication, 101, 1–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ibn Ezra, M. (1975). Kitab al-Muhadarah wa-al-Mudhakarah. (Ed.) Halkim, Abraham Solomon. Mekize Nirdamim.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2020). Extended conceptual metaphor theory. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lu, W. -L. (2022). A conceptual exploration of polysemy: A case study of [V] — [UP] and [V] — [SHÀNG]. Brno. Masaryk University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richards, I. A. (1936). The philosophy of rhetoric. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. (1975). La metàphore vive. Paris, France: editions du Seuil.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Berenike Herrmann, J., Kaal, A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma T. (2010). A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tyler, A. & Evans, V. (2003). The semantics of English prepositions: Spatial scenes, embodied meaning and cognition. Cambridge, England. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trim, R. (2007). Metaphor networks. The comparative evolution of figurative language. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Metaphor and the historical evolution of conceptual mapping. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave MacMillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vandeloise, C. (1991). Spatial prepositions: A case study from French. Chicago: University Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue