Review published In: Bringing Figurative Language into Real L2 Classrooms: The challenges of empirical testing
Edited by Ana M. Piquer-Píriz and Reyes Llopis-García
[Review of Cognitive Linguistics 22:2] 2024
► pp. 605–610
Book review
. Tastes we live by. The linguistic conceptualisation of taste in English. Berlin & Boston: Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2021. [Applications of Cognitive Linguistics [ACL] series, 50]. 217 pp. ISBN 978-3-11-062677-3 (PDF) / 978-3-11-063040-4 (EPUB) / 978-3-11-062686-5. ISSN 1861-4078
Reviewed by
Published online: 21 June 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00194.rui
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00194.rui
References (6)
Bagli, M. (2017). Tastes we’ve lived by. Taste metaphors in English. Textus, English Studies in Italy, 11, 33–48.
Davies, M. (2008). The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990-present. Available online at 〈[URL]〉 [Last accessed: 29.04.2024]
Kövecses, Z., Ambrus, L., Hegedûs, D., Imai, R., & Sobczak, A. (2019). The lexical vs. corpus-based method in the study of metaphors. In M. Bolognesi, M. Brdar & K. Š. Despot (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in the digital age: Theory and methods for building repositories of figurative language (pp. 149–173). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. 2003 (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Speed, L., O’Meara, C., San Roque, L., & Majid, A. (Eds.). (2019). Perception metaphors. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Winter, B. (2019). Sensory linguistics: Language, perception and metaphor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
