Cover not available

Article published In: Bringing Figurative Language into Real L2 Classrooms: The challenges of empirical testing
Edited by Ana M. Piquer-Píriz and Reyes Llopis-García
[Review of Cognitive Linguistics 22:2] 2024
► pp. 309–329

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required
Special issue article

Testing the benefits of relating figurative idioms to their literal underpinnings

The role of individual differences

ORCiD logo with link | Western University
ORCiD logo with link | Western University
Published online: 23 April 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00184.luo
Abstract
Second/foreign language (L2) learners appear to remember figurative idioms relatively well if they are informed of the literal underpinning of the expressions, that is, the context in which the expressions were (or still are) used in a literal sense. In the present exploratory study, ESL learners read texts accompanied by glosses which did or did not mention the literal underpinnings of idioms used in the texts, and their recollection of the idioms was tested immediately after the reading task and again one week later. The mean test scores were very similar across the gloss conditions, suggesting no mnemonic benefits of giving literal underpinnings. However, retrospective interviews with the participants revealed considerable variation in the way they had engaged with the materials. For example, several students who were not given information about the literal underpinnings speculated about those underpinnings spontaneously, while those who were given this information did not always understand its relation to the idiomatic meanings. The interviews also revealed considerable variation in the students’ perception of the purpose of the glosses, with some treating them as support for text comprehension and others treating them as input for deliberate vocabulary study. The findings illustrate how mixed-methods research that looks not just at aggregated learning outcomes but at individuals’ learning processes can help to finetune expectations about the efficacy of an instructional intervention and, ultimately, perhaps help to optimize the intervention itself.
Article outline
  • 1.Background
  • 2.Research questions
  • 3.Method
    • 3.1Participants
    • 3.2Materials and procedures
  • 4.Results and discussion
    • 4.1Test scores
    • 4.2Interview data
  • 5.Conclusions, limitations, and directions
  • References
References (25)
References
Boers, F. (2000a). Metaphor awareness and vocabulary retention. Applied Linguistics, 21(4), 553–571. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000b). Enhancing metaphoric awareness in specialised reading. English for Specific Purposes, 19(2), 137–147. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boers, F., Demecheleer, M., & Eyckmans, J. (2004). Etymological elaboration as a strategy for learning figurative idioms. In P. Bogaards & B. Laufer (Eds.), Vocabulary in a second language: Selection, acquisition, and testing (pp. 53–78). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boers, F., Eyckmans, J., & Stengers, H. (2007). Presenting figurative idioms with a touch of etymology: More than mere mnemonics? Language Teaching Research, 11(1), 43–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boers, F., Lindstromberg, S., Littlemore, J., Stengers, H., & Eyckmans, J. (2008). Variables in the mnemonic effectiveness of pictorial elucidation. In F. Boers & S. Lindstromberg (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology (pp. 189–116). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boers, F., & Littlemore, J. (2000). Cognitive style variables in participants’ explanations of conceptual metaphors. Metaphor and Symbol, 15(3), 177–187. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boers, F., Piquer Píriz, A. M., Stengers, H., & Eyckmans, J. (2009). Does pictorial elucidation foster recollection of figurative idioms? Language Teaching Research, 13(4), 367–388. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carrol, G., & Littlemore, J. (2020). Resolving figurative expressions during reading: The role of familiarity, transparency, and context. Discourse Processes, 57(7), 609–626. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Collins Cobuild Idioms Dictionary (3rd ed.). (2012). Glasgow: HarperCollins Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cooper, T. C. (1999). Processing of idioms by L2 learners of English. TESOL Quarterly, 33(2), 233–262. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Beaton, A. (1993). Psycholinguistic determinants of foreign language vocabulary learning. Language Learning, 43(4), 559–617. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Farley, A. P., Ramonda, K., & Liu, X. (2012). The concreteness effect and the bilingual lexicon: The impact of visual stimuli attachment on meaning recall of abstract L2 words. Language Teaching Research, 16(4), 449–466. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gallucci, M. (2019). GAMLj: General analyses for linear models. [jamovi module]. Retrieved from [URL]
Grant, L., & Bauer, L. (2004). Criteria for redefining idioms: Are we barking up the wrong tree? Applied Linguistics, 25(1), 38–61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laufer, B. (2020). Lexical coverages, inferencing unknown words and reading comprehension: How are they related? TESOL Quarterly, 54(4), 1076–1085. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Littlemore, J., Chen, P. T., Koester, A., & Barnden, J. (2011). Difficulties in metaphor comprehension faced by international students whose first language is not English. Applied Linguistics, 32(4), 408–429. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Littlemore, J., & Low, G. (2006). Metaphoric competence, second language learning, and communicative language ability. Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 268–294. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ramonda, K. (2022). A double-edged sword: Metaphor and metonymy through pictures for learning idioms. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 60(3), 523–561. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Skoufaki, S. (2008). Conceptual metaphoric meaning clues in two L2 idiom presentation methods. In F. Boers, F. & S. Lindstromberg (Eds.) Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology (pp. 101–132). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ureña Tormo, C., Stengers, H., & Deconinck, J. (2023). Teaching L2 Spanish idioms with semantic motivation: Should this be done proactively or retroactively? International Review of Applied Linguistics, 61(4), 1639–1667. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
The jamovi project (2021). jamovi. (Version 2.2) [Computer Software]. Retrieved from [URL]
Wang, X., Boers, F., & Warren, P. (2020). Using literal underpinnings to help learners remember figurative idioms: Does the connection need to be crystal-clear? In A. M. Piquer-Píriz & R. Alejo-González (Eds.), Metaphor in foreign language instruction (pp. 221–240). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Warren, P., Boers, F., Grimshaw, G., & Siyanova-Chanturia, A. (2018). The effect of gloss type on learners’ intake of new words during reading: Evidence from eye tracking. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(4), 883–906. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Webb, S. (2020). Incidental vocabulary learning. In S. Webb (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of vocabulary studies (pp. 225–239). New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yu, X., & Boers, F. (2023). Inferring the meaning of idioms: Does accuracy matter for retention in memory? RELC Journal. Epub ahead of print. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue