Article published In: Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Vol. 24:1 (2026) ► pp.1–30
Image schemas and (point)-to-point event model for the macro-event
Published online: 23 April 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00177.li
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00177.li
Abstract
The macro-event is a fundamental concept in Talmyan motion event typology. A large literature has been documented
concerning the status of a particular language in the two-way typology that he proposes, but relatively little literature focusing
on the morphosyntactic dimension of the macro-event per se, let alone on the cognitive motivation of the macro-event. This article
analyzes the types of macro-events expressed by directional complement constructions in Mandarin, and argues that the macro-events
are image-schema-based. The simple image schemas give rise to a more complex three-event-semantic-model, termed
(point)-to-point, or to be more particular, (point a)-to-point b, in which
to represents the affecting or intervening event, point a represents the original state of point b,
point b is the resulting event. point a is usually implied, not explicitly expressed, so it is put in
brackets. This model has advantages over Talmy’s main event and co-event structure in that it can largely predict the meaning-form
mapping, and explain more constructions. The findings have some implications for cognitive semantics: In grammar, languages
generally prioritize the third event; the complex event model might be motivated by simple image schemas.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The structure of a macro-event
- 3.Characterizing the image schemas
- 3.1Definition
- 3.2Function as a bridge
- 3.3An inventory
- 3.4The preservation of the image schemas
- 3.5Summary
- 4.Image schema as the core schema of a macro-event
- 4.1Image schema as the core schema
- 4.2Directional complements as image schemas in Mandarin
- 5.(point)-to-point as an event model for macro-events
- 5.1The (point)-to-point of the motion event
- 5.2The (point)-to-point of the event of temporal contouring
- 5.3The (point)-to-point of the event of state change
- 5.4The (point)-to-point of the event of action correlating
- 5.5The (point)-to-point of the event of realization
- 6.Discussion and extension
- 6.1Macro-event is image-schema-motivated
- 6.2(point)-to-point as metaphysics of complex event
- 6.3Sentences with adjectives as complements or predicates
- 6.4(point)-to-point as a model for general conceptualization
- 7.Concluding remarks
- Acknowledgements
- Data availability statements
References
References (38)
Beavers, J., Levin, B., Wei Tham, S. (2010). The
typology of motion expressions revisited. Journal of
Linguistics, 461, 331–377.
Brugman, C. (1981). The
story of over: Polysemy, semantics, and the structure of the lexicon. New York: Garland Publishing.
Cienki, A. (1998). Some
properties and groupings of image schemas. In M. Verspoor, K. Dong Lee & E. Sweetser (Eds.), Lexical
and syntactical constructions and the construction of
meaning (pp. 3–15). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Croft, W., Barðdal, J., Hollmann, W., Sotirova, V., & Taoka, C. (2010). Revising
Talmy’s typological classification of complex event
constructions. In H. C. Boas (Ed.), Contrastive
studies in construction
grammar. (pp. 201–236) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Dodge, E., & Lakoff, G. (2005). Image
schemas: From linguistic analysis to neural grounding. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From
perception to meaning: Image schemas in Cognitive
Linguistics (pp. 57–93). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2006b). Words
and other wonders: Papers on lexical and semantic topics. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Gibbs, R. W., & Colston, H. (1995). The
cognitive psychological reality of image schemas and their transformations. Cognitive
Linguistics, 61, 347–378.
Gibbs, R. W., Jr., Dinara, A., Beitel, M. H., and Sanders, P. E. (1994). Taking
a stand on the meanings of stand: Bodily experience as motivation for polysemy. Journal of
Semantics, 111, 231–251.
Goldberg, A. E., & Jackendoff, R. (2004). The
English resultative as a family of
constructions. Language, 801, 532–568.
Hampe, B. (Ed.). (2005). From
perception to meaning: Image schemas in Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hart, C., & Marmol Queralto, J. (2021). What
can cognitive linguistics tell us about language-image relations? A multidimensional approach to intersemiotic convergence in
multimodal texts. Cognitive
Linguistics, 32(4), 529–562.
Hedblom, M. M., Kutz, O., Peñaloza, R., & Guizaardi, G. (2019). Image
schema combinations and complex events. KI-Künstliche
Intelligenz, 331, 279–291.
Ioannou, G. (2018). Constructions
and image-schema preservation: A historical-comparative analysis of PAY in Greek and
English. Lingua, 2061, 85–111.
Johnson, M. (1987). The
body in the mind. The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women,
fire, and dangerous things. What categories reveal about the
mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989). More
than cool reason: A field guide to poetic
metaphor. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. (1990). The
invariance hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image-schemas? Cognitive
Linguistics, 1(1), 39–74.
Langacker, R. (1991). Foundations
of Cognitive
Grammar. Vol.21. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Li, T. F. (2018). Extending
the Talmyan typology: A case study of the macro-event as event integration and grammaticalization in
Mandarin. Cognitive
Linguistics, 29(3), 585–621.
(2019). Evolutionary
order of macro-events in Mandarin. Review of Cognitive
Linguistics, 17(1), 155–186.
Lindner, S. J. (1983). A
lexical-semantic analysis of English verb-particle constructions with UP and OUT. (Doctoral
dissertation, University of California, San Diego.) Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Liu, Y. (Eds.). (1998). A
comprehensive account of directional
complements. Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University Press. (刘月华,1998,《趋向补语通释》,北京:北京语言大学出版社。)
Mandler, J. M. (1992). How
to build a baby: II. Conceptual primitives. Psychological
Review, 991, 587–604.
Mandler, J. M. & Pagán Cánovas, C. (2014). On
defining image schemas. Language and
Cognition, 6(4), 510–532.
Shi, W., & Wu, Y. (2014). Which
way to move: The evolution of motion expressions in
Chinese. Linguistics, 52(5), 1237 – 1292.
Slobin, D. I. (2004). The
many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion
events. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating
events in narrative: Typological and contextual
perspectives (pp. 219–257). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Szwedek, A. (2023). The
image schema. In T. F. Li (Eds), Handbook
of cognitive
semantics (Vol II1). Leiden: Brill.
Talmy, L. (2000a). Toward
a cognitive semantics. Volume I: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
(2000b). Toward
a Cognitive Semantics. Volume II: Typology and Process in Concept Structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Tay, D. (2021). Image
schemas. In X. Wen & J. R. Taylor (Eds.), The
Routledge handbook of Cognitive
Linguistics (pp. 161–172). Routledge.
Tyler, A., & Evans, V. (2001). Reconsidering
prepositional polysemy networks: The case of
over. Language, 77(4), pp. 724–765.
