Article published In: Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Vol. 22:1 (2024) ► pp.100–123
Culture in a radically usage-based model of language change, with special reference to constructional attrition
Published online: 10 May 2023
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00152.noe
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00152.noe
Abstract
This article offers theoretical and programmatic reflection on how the impact of culture on language change should be accounted for from a radically usage-based diachronic construction grammatical perspective, with a focus on how cultural change can cause constructions to disappear from a language. It approaches this question through an assessment of how culture is incorporated in Schmid, H.-J. (2020). The dynamics of the linguistic system: Usage, conventionalization, and entrenchment. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Entrenchment-and-Conventionalization model of ‘the dynamics of the linguistic system’. Against the backdrop of various proposals on the effect of ‘democratization’ in Anglo-Saxon culture on subtractive historical developments in the modal domain of English, and based on a study of interpersonal variation in the intrapersonal longitudinal development of a declining modal construction, the paper argues that the influence of culture on language change is mediated by entrenchment and that culture has a more extensive impact on entrenchment than the EC-model currently allows for.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Constructional attrition and culture in the EC-model
- 2.1A summary of the EC-model
- 2.2Constructional attrition in the EC-model
- 2.3Culture in the EC-model
- 3.Democratization and the attrition of modal constructions
- 3.1Attrition in the English modal domain
- 3.2Democratization as an (independent) cultural factor
- 4.In favour of a bigger role for culture in the entrenchment component of the EC-model
- 4.1Individual differences in the decline of the Deontic nci construction
- 4.2Culture as a force on entrenchment
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (43)
Barðdal, J., Smirnova, E., Sommerer, L., & Gildea, S. (Eds.). (2015). Diachronic construction grammar. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Colleman, T., & Noël, D. (2012). The Dutch evidential NCI: A case of constructional attrition. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 13(1), 1–28.
de Tocqueville, A. (1953[1835–40]). Democracy in America [De La Démocratie en Amérique]. New York: Knopf.
Disney, S. (2016). Another visit to be supposed to from a diachronic constructionist perspective. English studies, 97(8), 892–916.
Enfield, N. J. (2002). Ethnosyntax: Introduction. In N. J. Enfield (Ed.), Ethnosyntax: Explorations in grammar and culture (pp. 3–30). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Garrard, J., Tolz, V., & White, R. (2000). Introduction. In J. Garrard, V. Tolz & R. White (Eds.), European democratization since 1800 (pp. 1–5). Houndmills: Macmillan.
Hilpert, M. (2020). The great temptation: What diachronic corpora do and do not reveal about social change. In P. Rautionaho, A. Nurmi & J. Klemola (Eds.), Corpora and the changing society: Studies in the evolution of English (pp. 3–28). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kulick, D. (1992a). Language shift as cultural reproduction. In T. Dutton (Ed.), Culture change, language change (pp. 7–26). Canberra: Australian National University.
(1992b). Language shift and cultural reproduction: Socialization, self, and syncretism in a Papua New Guinean village. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Langacker, R. W. (1994). Culture, cognition, and grammar. In M. Pütz (Ed.), Language contact and language conflict (pp. 25–53). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Leech, G. N. (2003). Modality on the move: The English modal auxiliaries 1961–1992. In R. Facchinetti, M. Krug & F. R. Palmer (Eds.), Modality in contemporary English (pp. 223–240). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Leech, G. (2013). Where have all the modals gone? An essay on the declining frequency of core modal auxiliaries in recent standard English. In J. I. Marín-Arrese, M. Carretero Lapeyre, J. Arús Hita & J. van der Auwera (Eds.), English modality: Core, periphery and evidentiality (pp. 95–115). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Leech, G., Hundt, M., Mair, C., & Smith, N. (2009). Change in contemporary English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mair, C. (2006). Twentieth-century English: History, variation and standardization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Myhill, J. (1995). Change and continuity in the functions of the American English modals. Linguistics, 33(2), 157–211.
(1996). The development of the strong obligation system in American English. American Speech, 71(4), 339–388.
Noël, D. (2008). The nominative and infinitive in Late Modern English: A diachronic constructionist approach. Journal of English Linguistics, 36(4), 314–340.
(2011). The modal be bound to constructions and the dynamic English constructicon. Paper presented in the workshop on ‘Diachronic Construction Grammar’ at the 44th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea (SLE 2011), Logroño, Spain, 8–11 September 2011.
(2016). For a radically usage-based diachronic construction grammar. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 301, 39–53.
(2017). The development of non-deontic be bound to in a radically usage-based diachronic construction grammar perspective. Lingua, 1991, 72–93.
(2019a). The author and the text in radically usage-based diachronic construction grammar, or why historical linguists have started analysing text again. Functions of Language, 26(1), 56–63.
(2019b). The decline of the Deontic nci construction in Late Modern English: Towards a radically usage-based perspective on constructional attrition. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, 6(1), 22–57.
(2022). Individual differences in the decline of the Deontic nci construction: A radically usage-based exploratory investigation. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, 9(1), 1–30.
Noël, Dirk. (2023). Towards a radically usage-based account of constructional attrition: Integrating subtractive language developments in the Entrenchment-and-Conventionalization model. In C. Gentens, L. Ghesquière, W. B. McGregor & A. Van linden (Eds.), Reconnecting form and meaning: In honour of Kristin Davidse (pp. 123–144). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Noël, D. & Colleman, T. (2021). Diachronic construction grammar. In X. Wen & J. R. Taylor (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 662–675). London: Routledge.
Noël, D., & van der Auwera, J. (2008). Revisiting be supposed to from a diachronic constructionist perspective. English Studies, 90(5), 599–623.
Peeters, B. (2015). Language and cultural values: Adventures in applied ethnolinguistics. International Journal of Language and Culture, 2(2), 133–141.
(2016). applied ethnolinguistics is cultural linguistics, but is it cultural linguistics? International Journal of Language and Culture, 3(2), 137–160.
Schmid, H.-J. (2020). The dynamics of the linguistic system: Usage, conventionalization, and entrenchment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sharifian, F. (2011). Cultural conceptualisations and language: Theoretical framework and applications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Simpson, J. (2002). From common ground to syntactic construction: Associated path in Warlpiri. In N. J. Enfield (Ed.), Ethnosyntax: Explorations in grammar and culture (pp. 287–203). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sinha, C. (2021). Culture in language and cognition. In X. Wen & J. R. Taylor (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 387–407). London: Routledge.
Stearns, P., & Stearns, C. Zisowitz. (1986). Anger: The struggle for emotional control in America’s history. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Traugott, E. Closs. (2022). Ten lectures on a diachronic constructionalist approach to discourse structuring markers. Leiden: Brill.
Traugott, E. Closs, & Trousdale, G. (2013). Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wierzbicka, A. (2002). English causative constructions in an ethnosyntactic perspective: Focusing on let. In N. J. Enfield (Ed.), Ethnosyntax: Explorations in grammar and culture (pp. 162–203). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.