Article published In: Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Vol. 22:1 (2024) ► pp.124–150
Gradience in iconicity
Evidence from total reduplicative constructions in Nigerian Pidgin
Published online: 26 May 2023
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00150.odi
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00150.odi
Abstract
While it has largely been taken for granted by most linguists that the relationship between linguistic signifier
and signified is arbitrary in nature, a growing number of studies suggest otherwise. In this article, we demonstrate that
iconicity in total reduplicative constructions in Nigerian Pidgin is graded in nature, and that the degree of iconicity of any
given reduplicative is largely correlated with the word class to which its simplex form belongs, with reduplicated ideophones and
adverbials exhibiting the highest degree of iconicity, reduplicated pronouns the lowest degree of iconicity, and reduplicated
adjectives, nouns, numerals and verbs intermediate degrees of iconicity.
Our results shed light, not only on which word classes are more prototypically involved in reduplication than
others in the world’s languages, but also on typical pathways that reduplicatives follow in processes of grammaticalization,
whereby their isomorphic form-meaning relationship appears increasingly attenuated, albeit due to varying language-internal
factors that are specific to individual languages.
Keywords: iconicity, arbitrariness, total reduplication, de-iconization, Nigerian Pidgin, Naija
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Iconicity
- 3.Total reduplication and related phenomena
- 3.1Frozen reduplication
- 3.2Stylistic repetition
- 4.Total reduplication in Nigerian Pidgin
- 5.Deviations from prototypically isomorphic iconicity related to total reduplication in Nigerian Pidgin
- 5.1Reduplication of pronouns
- 5.2Reduplication of verbs
- 5.3Other isolated cases of non-iconic reduplication
- 6.Discussion and conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
- The abbreviations used in the glosses for the examples in this work include the following
References
References (40)
Akinmade, T. A., & Salami, O. (Eds.). (2021). Current
trends in Nigerian Pidgin English. A sociolinguistic perspective. Boston & Berlin: De Gruyter, Mouton.
Bakker, P. (2008). Pidgins
versus Creoles and Pidgincreoles. In S. Kouwenberg & J. V. Singler (Eds.), The
handbook of pidgin and creole
studies (pp. 130–157). West-Sussex: Wiley Blackwell.
Booij, G. (2012). The
Grammar of words. An introduction to linguistic
morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Deuber, D. (2005). Nigerian
Pidgin in Lagos. Language contact, variation and change in an African urban
setting. London: Battlebridge.
Dingemanse, M. (2015). Ideophones
and reduplication: Depiction, description, and the interpretation of repeated talk in
discourse. Studies in
Language, 39(4), 946–970.
Egbokhare, F. (2021). The
accidental lingua franca: The paradox of the ascendancy of Nigerian Pidgin in
Nigeria. In A. T. Akande & O. Salami (Eds.), Current
trends in Nigerian Pidgin English. A sociolinguistic
perspective (pp. 67–114). Boston & Berlin: De Gruyter, Mouton.
Elugbe, B., & Omamor, A. (1991). Nigerian
Pidgin: Background and prospects. Ibadan: Heinemann Educational books Plc.
(2004). Nigerian
Pidgin English: Morphology and syntax. In B. Kortmann & E. W. Schneider (Eds.), A
handbook of varieties of
English 21 (pp. 828–853). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2021). Naija:
A language of the future. In A. T. Akande & O. Salami (Eds.), Current
trends in Nigerian Pidgin English. A sociolinguistic
perspective (pp. 9–38). Boston & Berlin: De Gruyter, Mouton.
Flaksman, M. (2015). Old
and modern English onomatopoeia: Two different systems? Papers from the IV University
conference ‘Current trends in
linguistics’ (pp. 97–98).
(2017). Iconic
treadmill hypothesis: The reasons behind continuous onomatopoeic
coinage. In M. Bauer, A. Zirker, O. Fisher & C. Ljungberg (Eds.), Dimensions
of
iconicity (pp. 15–38). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
(2020). Pathways
of de-iconization: How borrowing, semantic evolution and regular sound change obscure
iconicity. In, P. Perniss, O. Fischer & C. Ljungberg (Eds.), Operationalizing
iconicity (pp. 75–104). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Gil, D. (2005). From
repetition to reduplication in Riau Indonesia. In B. Hurch (Ed.), Studies
on
reduplication (pp. 31–64). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2007). Creole
complexity and associational semantics. In L. Lim, S. Matthews & U. Ansaldo (Eds.), Deconstructing
creoles (pp. 67–108). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Givón, T. (1985). Iconicity,
isomorphism and non-arbitrary coding in syntax. In J. Haiman (Ed.), Iconicity
in
syntax (pp. 187–219). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Greenberg, J. H. (1995). On
language internal iconicity. In M. E. Landsberg (Ed.), Syntactic
iconicity and linguistic freezes: The human
dimension (pp. 57–63). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hammarström, H., Forkel, R., Haspelmath, M., & Bank, S. (2022). Glottolog
4.6. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available
online at [URL], Accessed
on 23-09-2022).
Kouwenberg, S., & LaCharité, D. (2001). Iconic
interpretations of reduplication: Issues in the study of reduplication in Caribbean Creole
languages. European Journal of English
Studies, 5(1), 59–80.
(2003). The
meaning s of “more of the same”. Iconicity in reduplication and the evidence for substrate influence in the genesis of
Caribbean Creole languages. In S. Kouwenberg (Ed.), Twice
as meaningful. Reduplication in pidgins, creoles and other contact
languages (pp. 7–18). London: Battlebridge.
(2005). Less
is more: Evidence from diminutive reduplication in Caribbean Creole
languages. In B. Hurch (Ed.), Studies
on
reduplication (pp. 533–545). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2011). The
typology of the Caribbean Creole reduplication. Journal of Pidgin and Creole
Languages, 26(1), 194–218.
(2015). Arbitrariness
and iconicity in total reduplication. Evidence from Caribbean Creoles. Studies in
Language, 39(4), 971–991. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women,
fire and dangerous things. What categories reveal about the
mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B. (2007). Polysemy,
prototypes, and radial categories. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The
Oxford handbook of Cognitive
Linguistics (pp. 139–169). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Occhino, C., Anible, B., Wilkinson, E., & Morford, J. (2017). Iconicity
is in the eye of the beholder: How language experience affects perceived
iconicity. Gesture, 16(1), 99–125.
Odiegwu, N. C. (Forthcoming). Radial
representations of the semantics of reduplicative constructions in Nigerian Pidgin
(Naija). Cognitive Semantics.
Osisanwo, A. (2012). A
morphological analysis of Nigerian Pidgin: The examples of selected advertisement jingles. The
Journal of the Linguistics Association of
Nigeria, 151, 41–54.
Peirce, C. S. (1931–1958). Collected
papers of Charles Sanders Pierce, 1–6. C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss (Eds.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University press.
Perlman, M., & Cain, A. A. (2014). Iconicity
in vocalization, comparisons with gesture, and implications for theories on the evolution of
language. Gesture, 14(3), 320–350.
Rozhanskiy, I. (2015). Two
semantic patterns of reduplication. Iconicity revisited. Studies in
language, 39(4), 992–1018. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Stolz, T. (2007). Re:
duplication. Iconic vs counter-iconic principles (and their areal
correlates). In P. Ramat & E. Roma (Eds.), Studies
in language companion series
88 (pp. 317–350). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Stolz, T., & Levkovych, N. (2018). Function
vs Form – On ways of telling repetition and reduplication
apart. In R. Finkbeiner & U. Freywald (Eds.), Exact
repetition in grammar and
discourse (pp 29–66). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Van Goethem, K., Norde, M., Coussé, E., & Vanderbauwhede, G. (2018). Category
change from a constructional perspective. Introduction. In K. Van Goethem, M. Norde, E. Coussé & G. Vanderbauwhede (Eds.), Category
change from a constructional
perspective (pp 3–8). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Van Langendonck, W. (2007). Iconicity. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The
Oxford handbook of Cognitive
Linguistics (pp. 394–418). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Voeltz, E. F. K., & Kilian–Hatz, C. (Eds.). (2001). Ideophones. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
