Article published In: Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Vol. 20:2 (2022) ► pp.330–356
Chinese adverbs
A Cognitive Grammar exploration
Published online: 8 December 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00114.zha
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00114.zha
Abstract
The category of adverbs in Chinese, as is its counterpart in English, is featured by morphological, syntactic and semantic heterogeneity. The heterogeneity poses the questions of the categorial coherence and the conflicting criteria in identifying adverbs. This paper starts with the definition of adverbs in Cognitive Grammar and analyzes degree adverbs, temporal adverbs, scope adverbs, manner adverbs, attitude adverbs and negation adverbs in Chinese. It is found that they all profile a relationship with a relational trajector, consistent with the proposal in Cognitive Grammar, but the precise relationship has to be specified. Some adverbs can also serve as mental space builders. Moreover, the morphological and syntactic behaviors of adverbs can be motivated to different degrees by their semantic functions. The paper attempts to establish the categorial status of adverbs. It develops the semantic account of lexical categories and motivates the formal aspects of language from meaning.
Keywords: Chinese adverb, cognitive grammar, lexical category
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Literature review
- 2.1The category of Chinese adverbs
- 2.2The CG approach to lexical categories
- 2.3The CG definition of adverbs
- 2.4Going beyond the CG definition of adverbs
- 3.Examining six types of Chinese adverbs
- 3.1Degree adverbs
- 3.2Temporal adverbs
- 3.3Scope adverbs
- 3.4Manner adverbs
- 3.5Attitude adverbs
- 3.6Negation adverbs
- 4.Conclusions
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (58)
Abney, S. (1987). The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. Ph.D dissertation. MIT: Cambridge, MA.
Biq, Y. O. (2015). Adverbs. In W. S. Y. Wang & C. F. Sun (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Chinese linguistics (pp. 414–428). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Boogaart, R., & Reuneker, A. (2017). Intersubjectivity and grammar. In B. Dancygier (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 188–206). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Börjars, K. (2016). Syntax: Putting words together. In K. Allan (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of linguistics (pp. 118–134). New York: Routledge.
Brenda, M. (2017). A cognitive perspective on the semantics of near. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 151,121–153.
(2016b). Chinese: Parts of speech. In S. W. Chan (Ed.), The Routledge encyclopedia of the Chinese language (pp. 242–294). New York: Routledge.
Chomsky, N. (1970). Remarks on nominalization. In R. Jacobs & P. Rosenbaum (Eds.), Readings in English transformational grammar (pp. 184–221). Waltham, MA.: Ginn.
Chung, S. (2012). Are lexical categories universal? The view from Chamorro. Theoretical Linguistics, 381, 1–56.
Croft, W. (2000). Parts of speech as language universals and as language-particular categories. In P. M. Vogel & B. Comrie (Eds.), Approaches to the typology of word classes (pp. 65–102). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E. (2005). Mental spaces in grammar: Conditional constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Delfitto, D. (2006). Adverb classes and adverb placement. In M. Everaert & H. van Riemsdijk (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax (pp. 83–120). Oxford: Blackwell.
Ernst, T. (2014). Adverbial adjuncts in Mandarin Chinese. In C. T. J. Huang, Y. H. A. Li & A. Simpson (Eds.), The handbook of Chinese linguistics (pp. 49–72). London: Blackwell Publishers.
Fauconnier, G. (1994). Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1998). Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science, 221, 133–187.
Gilquin, G. (2006). The place of prototypicality in corpus linguistics: Causation in the hot seat. In A. Stefanowitsch & S. Gries (Eds.), Corpora in Cognitive Linguistics: Corpus-based approaches to syntax and lexis (pp. 159–192). Berlin & New York: Mouton De Gruyter.
Haspelmath, M. (2001). Word classes and parts of speech. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (pp. 16538–16545). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
(2010). Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in cross-linguistic studies. Language, 861, 663–687.
Hollmann, W. (2012). Word classes: Towards a more comprehensive usage-based account. Studies in Language, 361, 671–698.
(2019). Word classes. In B. Aarts, J. Bowie & G. Popova (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of English grammar (pp. 281–300). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Huddleston, R. (1984). Introduction to the grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jia, G. Q. (2016). Xiandai hanyu shijian fuci de xingshi yuyi yanjiu [Formal semantics of time adverbs in modern Chinese]. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.
Jing-Schmidt, Z., & Gries, S. (2009). Schematic meaning and pragmatic inference: The Mandarin adverbs hai, you and zai. Corpora, 41, 33–70.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
(2011). Conceptual semantics, symbolic grammar, and the day after day construction. In P. Sutcliffe, W. J. Sullivan & A. Lommel (Eds.), LACUS forum 36: Mechanisms of linguistic behavior (pp. 3–24). Houston: LACUS.
Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Lu, J. M., & Ma, Z. (1999). Xiandai hanyu xuci sanlun [Functional words in modern Chinese]. Beijing: Language and Culture Press.
Lu, W. L. (2019). When constructions meet context: The polysemy of Mandarin hai revisited. In D. F. Shu, H. Zhang & L. F. Zhang (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics and the study of Chinese (pp. 47–72). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Lyu, S. X. (1979). Hanyu yufa fenxi wenti [Issues in analysis of Chinese grammar]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
Marr, D., & Vaina, L. (1982). Representation and recognition of the movements of shapes. In Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences Vol. 214, No. 1197 (pp. 501–524). London: The Royal Society Publishing.
Pittner, K., Elsner, D., & Barteld, F. (2015). Introduction. In K. Pittner, D. Elsner & F. Barteld (Eds.), Adverbs: Functional and diachronic aspects (pp. 1–17). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of English. London: Longman.
Ramat, P., & Ricca, D. (1994). Prototypical adverbs: On the scalarity/radiality of the notion ADVERB. Rivista di Linguistica, 61, 289–326.
Rauh, G. (2015). Adverbs as a linguistic category (?) In K. Pittner, D. Elsner & F. Barteld (Eds.), Adverbs: Functional and diachronic aspects (pp. 19–46). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Shen, J. X. (2015). Zouchu “dou” de lianghua mitu: Xiangyou bu xiangzuo [Leftward or rightward? The quantifying direction of dou]. Studies of the Chinese Language, (1), 3–17.
Smith, M. (2015). Word categories. In J. R. Taylor (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the word (pp. 175–195). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stowell, T. (1981). Origins of phrase structure. Ph.D. dissertation. MIT: Cambridge, MA.
(2004). Why Construction Grammar is radical. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 21, 321–348.
(2019a). Prototype effects in grammar. In E. Dąbrowska & D. Divjak (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Key topics (pp. 127–147). Berlin & Boston: Walter de Gruyter GmbH.
(2019b). Cognitive Linguistic approaches. In B. Aarts, J. Bowie & G. Popova (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of English grammar (pp. 86–105). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
van der Auwera, J., & Du Mon, D. (2015). Negation, Lingusitics of. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 404–414). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Wang, W. B. (2019). The conceptual spatialization of actions or activities in Chinese: The adjective + verb construction. In D. F. Shu, H. Zhang & L. F. Zhang (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics and the study of Chinese (pp. 157–184). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Wierzbicka, A. (2000). Lexical prototypes as a universal basis for cross-linguistic identification of “parts of speech.” In P. M. Vogel & B. Comrie (Eds.), Approaches to the typology of word classes (pp. 285–320). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Zhang, Y. S. (2000). Xiandai hanyu fuci yanjiu [Research of modern Chinese adverbs]. Shanghai: Xuelin Press.
