Cover not available

Article published In: Living Metaphors and Metonymies
Edited by Mario Brdar and Rita Brdar-Szabó
[Review of Cognitive Linguistics 20:1] 2022
► pp. 130–155

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Attribute transfer

The figurative interpretation of shifted modifiers

 | University of Hamburg
Published online: 24 May 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00104.pan
Abstract
The rhetorical trope hypallage, here called Attribute Transfer (AT), has been exploited artistically and creatively since antiquity in poetic and narrative discourse, but it is also used in ordinary language. This study focuses on modifier-noun constructions in which the prenominal modifier (attribute) is “shifted” from one position to another – a “transfer” that triggers metonymic interpretations. AT constitutes a violation of the iconically motivated proximity principle (Givón, T. (2001). Syntax: An introduction. Vol. 21. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar) according to which the conceptual and functional closeness of linguistic units is mirrored in their morphosyntactic structure. The principle of proximity competes with metonymic motivation – the latter prevailing at the expense of the former. An interesting structural parallelism exists between AT and the shift of the negator not from its “logical” position to another syntactic slot (‘neg-transportation’), which again exhibits a violation of the proximity principle. The article concludes with some suggestions for further research, especially cross-linguistic and typological investigations.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Some literary examples of Attribute Transfer
  • 3.Attribute Transfer in ordinary language
    • 3.1Introduction
    • 3.2Compositional vs. metonymically interpreted ModN constructions
      • 3.2.1Healthy person vs. healthy diet
      • 3.2.2Fasting person vs. fasting test
      • 3.2.3Drunken soldier vs. drunken spree: Assigning human attributes to events
      • 3.2.4Quiet and relaxed cups of coffee
      • 3.2.5Is a foreign correspondent a foreigner?
  • 4.A conflict between two cognitive parameters: Iconicity vs. metonymy
  • 5.Functions of hypallage
  • 6.Conclusion and outlook
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (47)
References
Barcelona, A. (2003). The case for a metonymic basis of pragmatic inferencing: Evidence from jokes and funny anecdotes. In K.-U. Panther & L. L. Thornburg (Eds.), Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 113) (pp. 81–102). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). The conceptual motivation of bahuvrihi compounds in English and Spanish. In M. Brdrar, S. Th. Gries & M. Žic Fuchs (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Convergence and expansion (Human Cognitive Processing 32) (pp. 151–178). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Metonymy. In E. Dąbrowska & D. Divjak (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 143–167). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barnden, J. A. (2010). Metaphor and metonymy: Making their connections more slippery. Cognitive Linguistics, 21(1), 1–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bierwiaczonek, B. (2013). Metonymy in language, thought and brain. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Branka-Rosoff, S., & Zinsmaier, T. (1998). Hypallage. In G. Ueding (Ed.), Historisches Wörterbuch der Rhetorik. Vol. 41. (pp.107–109). Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brdar, M. (2017). Metonymy and word-formation: Their interactions and complementation. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Collins, C., & Postal, P. M. (2014). Classical NEG raising: An essay in the syntax of negation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davies, M. (2008–). The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). Available online at: [URL]
Dingemanse, M., Perlman, M., & Perniss, P. (2020). Construals of iconicity: Experimental approaches to form–meaning resemblances in language. Language and Cognition, 121, 1–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dupriez, B. (1991). A dictionary of literary devices (A. Halsall, Trans.). New York: University of Toronto Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eliot, T. S. (2005). The Waste Land and other poems. New York: Barnes & Noble.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feist, J. (2012). Premodifiers in English: Their structure and significance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Genette, G. (1972). Figures III. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Givón, T. (2001). Syntax: An introduction. Vol. 21. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haiman, J. (1980). The iconicity of grammar: Isomorphism and motivation. Language, 561, 515–540. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(Ed.) (1985). Iconicity in syntax. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). In defense of iconicity. Cognitive Linguistics, 19(1), 35–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horn, L. R. (2006). Implicature. In L. R. Horn & G. Ward (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics (pp. 3–28). Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020). Neg-raising. In V. Déprez & M. T. Espinal (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of negation (pp. 199–215). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lausberg, H. (1990). Elemente der literarischen Rhetorik. München: Hueber.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Littlemore, J. (2015). Metonymy: Hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Metonymy. In B. Dancygier (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 407–422). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B., Malchukov, A., & Moravcsik, E. (Eds.) (2014). Competing motivations in grammar and usage. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McNally, L. (2016). Modification. In M. Aloni & P. Dekker (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of formal semantics (pp. 442–464). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Newmeyer, F. J. (2013). Goals and methods of generative syntax. In M. den Dikken (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of generative syntax (pp. 61–92). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Panther, K.-U. (2022). Introduction to cognitive pragmatics (Cognitive Linguistics in Practice 4). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Panther, K.-U., & Thornburg, L. L. (1998). A cognitive approach to inferencing in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 301, 755–769. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Metonymy. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 236–263). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). What kind of reasoning mode is metonymy. In O. Blanco-Carrión, A. Barcelona, & R. Pannain (Eds.), Conceptual metonymy: Methodological, theoretical, and descriptive issues (Human Cognitive Processing 60) (pp. 121–160). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Posner, R. (1986). Iconicity in syntax: The natural order of attributes. In P. Bouissac, M. Herzfeld, & R. Posner (Eds.), Iconicity: Essays on the nature of culture. Festschrift for Thomas A. Sebeok on his 65th birthday (pp. 305–337). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prince, E. (1976). The syntax and semantics of neg-raising, with evidence from French. Language 52(2), 404–426. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Proust, M. (2005). In search of lost time. Vol. II: Within a budding grove. (C. K. S. Moncrieff, T. Kilmartin, & D. J. Enright. Trans.). London: Vintage Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1920). À l’ombre des jeunes filles en fleurs. Paris: Éditions de la Nouvelle Revue Française.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Radden, G. (2021). Iconicity. In X. Wen & J. R. Taylor (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 268–296). New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Radden, G., & Kövecses, Z. (2007). Towards a theory of metonymy. In V. Evans, B. K. Bergen, & J. Zinken (Eds.), The cognitive linguistics reader (pp. 335–359). London: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rijkhoff, J. (2008). Descriptive and discourse-referential modifiers in a layered model of the noun phrase. Linguistics 46(4), 789–829. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Romoli, J. (2013). A scalar implicature-based approach to neg-raising. Linguistics and Philosophy, 361, 291–353. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. (2020). Figurative language: Relations and constraints. In J. Barnden & A. Gargett (Eds.), Producing figurative expression: Theoretical, experimental and practical perspectives (Figurative Language and Thought 10) (pp. 469–510). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2021). Conceptual metonymy theory revisited: Some definitional and taxonomic issues. In X. Wen & J. R. Taylor (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 204–227). New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thornburg, L. L., & Panther, K.-U. (1997). Speech act metonymies. In W.-A. Liebert, G. Redeker, & L. Waugh (Eds), Discourse and perspective in cognitive linguistics (pp. 205–219). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ullmann, S. (1957). Style in the French novel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Virgil (1995). The Aeneid (E. McCrorie, Trans.). Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wulff, S. (2003). A multifactorial corpus analysis of adjective order in English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(2), 245–282. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Kopeć, Zbigniew & Pilar Guerrero Medina
2025. Metaphoric and metonymic motivation in the Light Verb Construction with GIVE. Complutense Journal of English Studies 33 ► pp. e103616 ff. DOI logo
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Linda L. Thornburg
2023. Hypallage is a rare bird. Not.. Lingua 289 ► pp. 103511 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue