Article published In: Living Metaphors and Metonymies
Edited by Mario Brdar and Rita Brdar-Szabó
[Review of Cognitive Linguistics 20:1] 2022
► pp. 91–103
The heart of the matter: A matter of the heart
The crucifixion of Jesus from a cognitive semantic perspective
Published online: 24 May 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00102.kov
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00102.kov
Abstract
Why should Jesus die? I attempt to investigate the symbolic roots and significance of the crucifixion by means of the conceptual tools and methodology of cognitive semantics. In particular, I propose that we approach the meaning of Jesus’ death on four symbolic levels:
–
the level where Jesus is a sacrificial lamb;
–
the level where Jesus is a scapegoat and a sufferer for people’s sins;
–
the level where Jesus is a redeemer and a savior;
–
the level where Jesus is bread and wine in the Holy Communion.
I suggest that all four levels prove distinct yet interdependent interpretations for the crucifixion. The different interpretations bring to the fore different aspects of the figure of Jesus and his death. While all of these aspects have been studied extensively by various authors from a cognitive linguistic perspective, my focus will be on the interrelations and interdependence of the four interpretations of Jesus’ figure and death.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Jesus as sacrificial lamb
- 3.Jesus as scapegoat and sufferer for all people
- 4.Jesus as redeemer and savior
- 5.The Holy Communion
- 6.Conclusions
- Acknowledgements
References
References (20)
Barcelona, A. (2003). The metaphorical and metonymic understanding of the trinitarian dogma. IJES, 3(l), 1–27.
Bible Gateway. [URL]
Brdar-Szabó, R. (2012). How night gets transformed into a cross: Poetic imagery in Edith Stein’s Science of the Cross. In S. Kleinke, Z. Kövecses, A. Musolff & V. Szelid (Eds.), Cognition and culture. The role of metaphor and metonymy (pp. 1163–177). Budapest: Eötvös Loránd University Press.
Johnson, G. (2003). The economies of grace as gift and moral accounting: insights from cognitive linguistics. In K. Feyaerts (Ed.), The Bible through metaphor and translation. A cognitive semantic perspective (pp. 87–111). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.
Kövecses, Z. (2002/2010). Metaphor. A practical introduction. Second revised edition, 2010. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
(2006). Language, mind, and culture. A practical introduction. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
(2011). The biblical story retold: A cognitive linguistic perspective. In M. Brdar, S. Th. Gries & M. Z. Fuchs (Eds)., Cognitive Linguistics. Convergence and expansion (pp. 325–354). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Krzeszowski, T. (1997). Angels and devils in hell. Elements of axiology in semantics (pp. 264–267). Warsaw, Poland: Energeia.
(1997). Angels and devils in hell. Elements of axiology in semantics (pp. 262–263). Warsaw, Poland: Energeia.
Kuczok, M. (2020). The interplay of metaphor and metonymy in Christian symbols. Metaphor and Symbol, 35(4), 236–249.
(1999). Philosophy in the flesh. The embodied mind and its challenges to Western thought (pp. 292–296). New York: Basic Books.
Richardson, P., Mueller, C. M., & Pihlaja, S. (2021). Cognitive Linguistics and religious language. An introduction (pp. 107–110). New York: Routledge.