Cover not available

Review published In: Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Vol. 19:2 (2021) ► pp.596601

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (16)
References
Divjak, D., & Arppe, A. (2013). Extracting prototypes from exemplars: What can corpus data tell us about concept representation? Cognitive Linguistics 24(2), 221–274. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, V. (2019). Cognitive Linguistics A complete guide (2nd ed.). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1993). Quantitative studies and probabilities in grammar. In M. Hoey (Ed.), Data, description, discourse: Papers on the English language in honour of John McH. Sinclair (pp. 1–25). London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Isac, D., & Reiss, C. (2013). I-Language: An introduction to linguistics as cognitive science (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Janda, L. A. (2013). Quantitative methods in Cognitive Linguistics: An introduction. In L. A. Janda (ed.), Cognitive Linguistics: The quantitative turn (pp. 1–32). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Köhler, R. (2012). Quantitative syntax analysis. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liu, H. (2008). Dependency distance as a metric of language comprehension difficulty. Journal of Cognitive Science 9(2), 159–191. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). An introduction to quantitative linguistics. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liu, H., Xu, C., & Liang, J. (2017). Dependency distance: A new perspective on syntactic patterns innatural languages. Physics of Life Reviews, 211, 171–193. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, S. (2018). Grammatical theory: From transformational grammar to constraint-based approaches (2nd ed.). Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pothos, E. M., & Wills, A. J., (Eds.). (2011). Formal approaches in categorization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmid, H.-J. (2000). English abstract nouns as conceptual shells: From corpus to cognition. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020). The dynamics of the linguistic system: Usage, conventionalization, and entrenchment. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, J. D. (2014). Prototypes, exemplars, and the natural history of categorization. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(2), 312–331. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A., & Flach, S. (2017). The corpus-based perspective on entrenchment. In H.-J. Schmid (Ed.), Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning: How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge (pp. 101–127). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vanpaemel, W., & Storms, G. (2008). In search of abstraction: The varying abstraction model of categorization. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(4), 732–749. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Hao, Yuxin, Xuelin Wang, Shuai Bin & Haitao Liu
2023. A probability distribution of dependencies in interlanguage. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 59:1  pp. 65 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue