Cover not available

Article published In: Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Vol. 19:2 (2021) ► pp.548–562

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Living in turbulent times

The embodied effect of physical instability on opinions about the COVID-19 pandemic

 | Southwest University
Published online: 11 October 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00094.li
Abstract
Spoken metaphors such as “unstable situation” document a conceptual association between physical instability and difficult situations. Drawing on research in embodied cognition and conceptual metaphor, the present research examined whether people’s somatic experience can influence their attitudes toward the current COVID-19 pandemic. The hypothesis is that inducing a sensorimotor state such as physical instability can activate the associated abstract concepts such as the feelings of instability during a public health crisis. In Experiment 1, participants who sat at a wobbly table and chair believed more in and had greater concern about the coronavirus disease than participants in a stable workstation. Using a different manipulation of physical instability and a more diverse sample, Experiment 2 found that participants who stood on one foot rather than two were more likely to worry about the pandemic. Experiment 3 examined consequential behavior that might follow from respondents’ COVID-19-related attitudes. The results showed that participants who adopted a single-leg stance rather than a double-leg stance donated more money to the coronavirus treatment acceleration program aiming to stabilize the virus situation. Taken together, these findings indicate that seemingly irrelevant physical experiences can skew people’s opinions on the COVID-19 pandemic, exerting potential downstream effects on their actual behavior.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Experiment 1
    • 2.1Method
      • 2.1.1Participants
      • 2.1.2Materials and procedure
    • 2.2Results and discussion
  • 3.Experiment 2
    • 3.1Method
      • 3.1.1Participants
      • 3.1.2Materials and procedure
    • 3.2Results and discussion
  • 4.Experiment 3
    • 4.1Method
      • 4.1.1Participants
      • 4.1.2Materials and procedure
    • 4.2Results and discussion
  • 5.General discussion
  • References
References (38)
References
Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2008). Embodied persuasion: Fundamental processes by which bodily responses can impact attitudes. In G. R. Semin & E. R. Smith (Eds.), Embodied grounding: Social, cognitive, affective, and neuroscientific approaches (pp. 184–207). New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duncan, L. A., Schaller, M., & Park, J. H. (2009). Perceived vulnerability to disease: Development and validation of a 15-item self-report instrument. Personality and Individual Differences, 471, 541–546. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Earp, B. D., Everett, J. A., Madva, E. N., & Hamlin, J. K. (2014). Out, damned spot: Can the “Macbeth Effect” be replicated? Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 36(1), 91–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ford, M. B. (2021). Social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic as a predictor of daily psychological, social, and health-related outcomes. The Journal of General Psychology, 148(3), 1–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forest, A. L., Kille, D. R., Wood, J. V., & Stehouwer, L. R. (2015). Turbulent times, rocky relationships: Relational consequences of experiencing physical instability. Psychological Science, 26(8), 1261–1271. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gao, Y., Sun, F., Jiang, W., Fang, Y., Yue, L., Lin, X., & Li, X. (2020). Beliefs towards the COVID-19 pandemic among patients with emotional disorders in China. General Psychiatry, 33(3), e100231. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (2005). Embodiment and cognitive science. London: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Metaphor wars. London: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hauser, D. J., & Schwarz, N. (2020). Situated embodiment: When physical weight does and does not inform judgments of importance. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1–8. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kalichman, S. C. (1994). Magic Johnson and public attitudes toward AIDS: A review of empirical findings. AIDS Education and Prevention, 61, 542–557.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kille, D. R., Forest, A. L., & Wood, J. V. (2013). Tall, dark, and stable: Embodiment motivates mate selection preferences. Psychological Science, 24(1), 112–114. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2011). Recent developments in metaphor theory: Are the new views rival ones?. Review of Cognitive Linguistics. Published under the Auspices of the Spanish Cognitive Linguistics Association, 9(1), 11–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (2012). Explaining embodied cognition results. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(4), 773–785. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). Philosophy in the flesh. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Landau, M. J. (2016). Conceptual metaphor in social psychology: The poetics of everyday life. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Landau, M. J., Meier, B. P., & Keefer, L. A. (2010). A metaphor-enriched social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 1045–1067. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, H. (2020). Less is more: Motor fluency impairment and body-specific representation of valence. Review of Cognitive Linguistics. Published under the auspices of the Spanish Cognitive Linguistics Association, 18(2), 519–534. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2021). Follow or not follow?: The relationship between psychological entitlement and compliance with preventive measures to the COVID-19. Personality and Individual Differences, 1741, 110678. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, H., & Cao, Y. (2019). Losing your footing, losing your morality: The embodied effect of physical slant on moral judgment. Review of Cognitive Linguistics. Published under the auspices of the Spanish Cognitive Linguistics Association, 17(2), 497–510. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2021a). The bright side of the COVID-19 pandemic: Public coughing weakens the overconfidence bias in non-health domains. Personality and Individual Differences, 1781, 110861. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2021b). In times of illness: Covid-19 threat influences temporal focus and implicit space-time mappings. Personality and Individual Differences, 1711, 110561. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, H., & Shen, S. (2020). A clearer sense of self: relationship between bilingualism and overconfidence bias. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, Y., Johnson, E. J., & Zaval, L. (2011). Local warming: Daily temperature change influences belief in global warming. Psychological Science, 22(4), 454–459. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lu, J. G., Quoidbach, J., Gino, F., Chakroff, A., Maddux, W. W., & Galinsky, A. D. (2017). The dark side of going abroad: How broad foreign experiences increase immoral behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(1), 1–16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meier, B. P., Schnall, S., Schwarz, N., & Bargh, J. A. (2012). Embodiment in social psychology. Topics in Cognitive Science, 41, 705–716. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meischke, H., Sellers, D. E., Robbins, M. L., Goff, D. C., Daya, M. R., Meshack, A., & Hand, M. M. (2000). Factors that influence personal perceptions of the risk of an acute myocardial infarction. Behavioral Medicine, 261, 4–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior research methods, 40(3), 879–891.
Ostarek, M., & Huettig, F. (2019). Six challenges for embodiment research. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(6), 593–599. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prentice, D. A., & Miller, D. T. (1992). When small effects are impressive. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 160–164. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., & Pérez-Hernández, L. (2011). The contemporary theory of metaphor: Myths, developments and challenges. Metaphor and Symbol, 26(3), 161–185. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sheetal, A., Feng, Z., & Savani, K. (2020). Using machine learning to generate novel hypotheses: Increasing optimism about COVID-19 makes people less willing to justify unethical behaviors. Psychological Science, 31(10), 1222–1235. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Varma, D. D. V. N. A., Bagaria, A., Kumari, S., Rajan, M., Priya, A., & Brahmbhatt, H. (2020). Knowledge, awareness and practice of safety guidelines among layman population regarding prevention of COVID-19 infection. Journal of Advanced Medical and Dental Sciences Research, 8(12), 35–38.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Williams, L. E., & Bargh, J. A. (2008). Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth. Science, 322(5901), 606–607. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Williams, L. E., Huang, J. Y., & Bargh, J. A. (2009). The scaffolded mind: Higher mental processes are grounded in early experience of the physical world. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(7), 1257–1267. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhong, C. B., & Liljenquist, K. (2006). Washing away your sins: Threatened morality and physical cleansing. Science, 313(5792), 1451–1452. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Li, Heng
2025. To Be a Tough Guy: Social-Categorical Thinking about Gender in a Chinese Primitive Patriarchal Tribe. Archives of Sexual Behavior 54:1 ► pp. 75 ff. DOI logo
Montalti, Martina, Stefana Garello & Valentina Cuccio
2025. Unstable metaphors, uncertain minds: how metaphors shape judgments and opinions. Frontiers in Psychology 16 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue