Article published In: Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Vol. 18:2 (2020) ► pp.372–396
A multimodal cognitive analysis of visual metonymies in picture books featuring same-sex-parent families
Published online: 4 December 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00064.moy
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00064.moy
Abstract
Verbal metaphor and also metonymy have been theorized from a conceptual perspective since Lakoff and Johnson published
Metaphors we live by in the 1980s. However, the final years of the twentieth century saw a new approach into non-verbal
monomodal or multimodal tropes (Forceville, Ch., & Urios-Aparisi, E. (Eds.) (2009). Multimodal metaphor. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. ). In an attempt to expand
upon the theorization and communicative functions of visual metonymies, this study aims to explore the meaning potential of metonymic
representations of characters in a sample of six picture books which portray same-sex-parent families. A multimodal cognitive approach has
been adopted to find out whether, and if so how, metonymic representations of characters contribute to the positive portrayal and acceptance
of same-sex-parent families in children’s picture books. The results reveal that monomodal visual metonymies are essentially used to
introduce new characters in the story and highlight important aspects of the plot which boost the acceptance of non-traditional
families.
Keywords: metonymy, picture books, multimodality, same-sex-parent families
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Literature review: A multimodal cognitive approach to metonymy
- 3.The analysis of metonymic representations
- 3.1Sample texts
- 3.2Methodology
- 3.3Metonymic manifestations in the picture books featuring two-dad families
- 3.4Metonymies in picture books portraying female same-sex families
- 4.Discussion
- 5.Final remarks
- Note
References Picture books
References (39)
Barcelona, A. (2002). Clarifying and applying the notions of metaphor and metonymy within Cognitive Linguistics: An update. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 202–277). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Cerrillo, P., & Yubero, S. (2007). Qué leer y en qué momento ‘What to read and when’. In P. Cerrillo & S. Yubero (Eds.), La formación de mediadores para la promoción de la lectura. Segunda Edición, ‘Training specialists in the promotion of reading’ (pp. 285–293). Cuenca: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha.
Evans, J. (Ed.) (2015). Challenging and controversial picture books. Creative and critical responses to visual texts. London & New York: Routledge.
Dziallas, K. (2019). The head and sexualized body parts as fruit and vegetables. Metaphor and the Social World, 921, 199–220.
(2009). Metonymy in visual and audiovisual discourse. In E. Ventola & A. J. Moya-Guijarro (Eds.), The world told and the world shown: Multisemiotic issues (pp. 57–74). Basingstoke & New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
(2014). Relevance Theory as model for analyzing visual and multimodal vommunication. In D. Machin (Ed.), Visual Communication (pp. 51–70). Berlin & New York: Mouton De Gruyter.
(2019). Developments in multimodal metaphor studies: A response to Górska, Coëgnarts, Porto and Romano and Muelas-Gil. In I. Navarro & I. Ferrando (Eds.), Current approaches to metaphor analysis in discourse (pp. 367–378). Berlin & New York: Mouton De Gruyter.
Forceville, Ch., & Urios-Aparisi, E. (Eds.) (2009). Multimodal metaphor. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hamilton, M., Anderson, D., Broaddus, M., & Young, K. (2006). Gender stereotyping and under-representation of female characters in 200 popular children’s picture books: A twenty-first century update. Sex Roles, 551, 757–65.
Hidalgo-Downing, L., & Kraljevic-Mujic, B. (2011). Multimodal metonymy and metaphor as complex discourse resources for creativity in ICT advertising discourse. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 153–178.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Littlemore, J. (2015). Metonymy: hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McCabe, J., Fairchild, E., Grauerholz, L., Pescosolido, B., & Tope, D. (2011). Gender in twentieth-century children’s books: Patterns of disparity in titles and central characters. Gender & Society, 25(2), 197–226.
Moya-Guijarro, A. J. (2013). Visual metonymy in children’s picture books. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 11(2), 336–352.
(2014). A multimodal analysis of picture books for children: A systemic functional approach. London: Equinox.
(2019). Textual functions of metonymies in Anthony Browne’s picture books: A multimodal approach. Text & Talk, 39(3), 389–413.
Nodelman, P. (1988). Words about pictures: The narrative art of children’s picture books. Athens, GA: University of Georgia.
Painter, C., Martin, J., & Unsworth, L. (2013). Reading visual narratives: Image analysis of children’s picture books. London: Equinox.
Pinar, M. J. (Ed.). (2013). Special Issue: Multimodality and Cognitive Linguistics. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 11(2). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
(Ed.). (2015). Multimodality and Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Rowell, E. (2007). Missing! Picture books reflecting gay and lesbian families. Make the curriculum inclusive for all children. Young Children, 62(3),24–30.
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. (2000). The role of mapping and domains in understanding metonymy. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (pp.109–132). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Diez, I. O. (2002). Patterns of conceptual interaction. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 489–532). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Pérez-Sobrino, P. (2017). Multimodal metaphor and metonymy in advertising. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Radden, G., & Kövecses, Z. (1999). Towards a theory of metonymy. In K. Panther and G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (pp. 17–59). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1985). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Second Edition. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sunderland, J., & McGlashan, M. (2012). Stories featuring two-mum and two-dad families. In J. Sunderland (Ed.), Language, gender and children’s fiction (pp. 142–172). London: Continuum.
Villacañas, B., & White, M. (2013). Pictorial metonymy as creativity source in Purificación García advertising campaigns. In L. Hidalgo & B. Kraljevic (Eds.), Metaphorical creativity across modes: Special issue of Metaphor and the Social World, 3(2),220–239. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Hidalgo-Downing, Laura
2025. Creative visual and multimodal metonymy in non-commercial advertisements on substance use. Metaphor and the Social World 15:2 ► pp. 288 ff.
Jensen, Thomas Wiben
Moya-Guijarro, Arsenio Jesús
Yuan, Guorong & Yi Sun
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
