Cover not available

Article published In: Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Vol. 18:1 (2020) ► pp.162–179

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Arbitrariness, motivation and idioms

 | Victoria University of Wellington
Published online: 17 August 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00055.bau
Abstract
This paper considers the interplay between arbitrariness and the widely-accepted ideals of one form, one meaning and compositionality. They are shown to operate in different domains, and to clash where there is idiomaticity. Idioms provide familiar forms which are not semantically relevant to the context. In effect, this creates homonymy, which goes against any trend towards pairing one form with one meaning. The conflict can be seen as tension between two more fundamental principles. Lack of motivation is considered in an Appendix on word-manufacture, where it is shown how slippery the notion of motivation can be.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Polysemy and homonymy
  • 3.A failure of terminology
  • 4.An apparent paradox
  • 5.A solution
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
References (43)
References
Al-Jarf, R. (1994). English and Arabic word-formation processes. [URL] accessed 19 Dec 2017
Baldi, P. (2000). Creative processes. In G. Booij, C. Lehmann & J. Mugdan (Eds.), Morphologie/Morphology (pp. 963–972). Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bauer, L. (1983). English word-formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). Morphological productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Compounds and minor word-formation types. In B. Arts & A. McMahon (Eds.), The handbook of English linguistics (pp. 483–506). Malden, MA: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, J. (1985). Morphology. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Campbell, L. (1998). Historical linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Casenhiser, D. M. (2005). Children’s resistance to homonymy: an experimental study of pseudohomonyms. Journal of Child Language 321, 319–343. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1983). The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cuyckens, Hu, Berg, T., & Dirven, R. (Eds.). (2003). Motivation in language. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Di Sciullo, A. M., & Williams, E. (1987). On the definition of word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Doherty, M. J. (2004). Children’s difficulty in learning homonyms. Journal of Child Language 311, 203–214. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dressler, W. U. (2005). Word-formation in natural morphology. In P. Štekauer & R. Lieber (Eds.), Handbook of word-formation (pp. 267–284). Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Firth, J. R. (1930). Speech. In J. R. Firth, The tongues of men and speech, 1964. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fleischer, W. (2000). Die Klassifiktion von Wortbildungsprozessen. In G. Booij, C. Lehmann & J. Mugdan (Eds.), Morphologie/Morphology (pp. 886–897). Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilliéron, J., & Roques, M. (1910). Études de géographie linguistique XII. Mots en collision. A: Le coq et le chat. Revue de Philologie Française 241, 278–288.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grant, L., & Bauer, L. (2004). Criteria for redefining idioms. Applied Linguistics, 251, 38–61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hinzen, W., Machery, E., & Werning, M. (Eds.). (2012). The Oxford handbook of compositionality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Julie, L. (n.d.). [URL] accessed 19 Dec 2017
Kaminski, J., Call, J., & Fischer, J. (2004). Word learning in a domestic dog evidence for ‘fast mapping’. Science, 3041, 1682–1683. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lightfoot, D. (1979). Principles of diachronic syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lipka, L. (1994). Lexicalization and institutionalization. In R. E. Asher (Ed.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics, vol. 41 (pp. 2164–2167). Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. 21 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marchand, H. (1969). The categories and types of present-day English word-formation. 2nd edition. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mazzacocco, M. M. (1997). Children’s interpretations of homonyms: a developmental study. Journal of Child Language, 241, 441–467. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Orr, J. (1962). Three studies on homonymics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Panther, K. U., & Radden, G. (Eds.). (2011). Motivation in grammar and the lexicon. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plag, I. (1999). Morphological productivity: structural constraints on English derivation. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Radden, G., & Panther, K. U. (Eds.). (2004a). Studies in linguistic motivation. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004b). Introduction: Reflections on motivation. In Radden & Günter (Eds.), Studies in linguistic motivation (pp. 1–46). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Renner, V., Maniez, F., & Arnaud, P. J. L. (Eds.). (2012). Cross-disciplinary perspectives on lexical blending. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruhl, C. (1989). On monosemy. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saussure, F. (1969) [1916]. Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schultink, H. (1961). Produktiviteit als morfologisch fenomeen. Forum der Letteren, 21, 110–125.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. M. (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Storkel, H. L., & Maekawa, J. (2005). A comparison of homonym and novel word learning: the role of phonotactic probability and word frequency. Journal of Child Language, 321, 827–853. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tulloch, S. (1991). The Oxford dictionary of new words. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ullmann, S. (1957). The principles of semantics. 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vennemann, T. (1972). Phonetic analogy and conceptual analogy. In T. Vennemann & T. H. Wilbur (Eds.), Schuchardt, the Neogrammarians, and the transformational theory of phonological change: Four essays (pp. 181–204). Frankfurt: Athenaeum. (Cited in Hock, H. H. (2003). Analogical change. In B. D. Joseph & R. D. Janda (Eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics (pp. 441–460). Malden, MA: Blackwell.)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weinreich, U. (1964). Languages in contact. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wray, A. (2012). What do we (think we) know about formulaic language? An evaluation of the current state of play. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 321, 231–254. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Bauer, Laurie
2023. A terminological problem. Diachronica 40:3 ► pp. 433 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue