Review published In: Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Vol. 17:2 (2019) ► pp.537–543
Book review
M. Brdar. Metonymy and word-formation: Their interaction and complementation
Reviewed by
Published online: 10 January 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00047.pan
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00047.pan
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The chapters of the book
- 3.The theoretical significance of the book
References
References (9)
Barcelona, A. (2005). The multilevel operation of metonymy in grammar and discourse, with particular attention to metonymic chains. In F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez & S. Peña Cervel (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction (Cognitive Linguistics Research 32) (pp. 313–352). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Brdar, M., & Brdar-Szabó, R. (2014). Where does metonymy begin? Some comments on Janda (2011). Cognitive Linguistics,
25
(2), 313–340.
Dirven, R. (1999). Conversion as conceptual conversion of event schemata. In K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (Human Cognitive Processing 4) (pp. 275–287). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Koch, P. (2001a). Lexical typology from a cognitive and linguistic point of view. In M. Haspelmath, E. König, W. Oesterreicher, & W. Raible (Eds.), Language typology and language universals: An international handbook. Vol.
2
1 (pp. 1142–1178). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
(2001b). Metonymy: Unity in diversity. Journal of Historical Pragmatics,
2
(2), 201–244.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Bagasheva, Alexandra & Jesús Fernández-Domínguez
2022. Fact-checking on compound verbs in English. In Paradigms in Word Formation [Studies in Language Companion Series, 225], ► pp. 69 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.