Cover not available

Article published In: Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Vol. 17:2 (2019) ► pp.411–437

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

The source-path-goal image schema in gestures for thinking and teaching

 | Lawrence University
Published online: 10 January 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00041.wil
Abstract
This article examines source-path-goal image-schematic structure in gestures used to solve counting problems (gesture for thinking) and to teach children how to read a clock (gesture for teaching). The analyses illustrate how path schemas inherent in idealized cognitive models are exhibited in gesture forms and in gesture sequences and combinations, manifesting conceptual content beyond that articulated in speech. While at times the path structure is incidental, enacting part of a cognitive model that is not the focus of discourse, at other times the path structure is essential, in that listeners must perceive the source-path-goal structure in the gesture in order to construct the proper understanding. The examples support the view that image schemas at the heart of cognitive models partly motivate and structure gestures for cognitive and communicative purposes, and that listener attunement to this structure contributes to intersubjective understanding and the perpetuation of cultural practices for distributed cognition.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Image schemas, cognitive models, and gesture
    • 2.1Image schemas and cognitive models
    • 2.2Image schemas and cognitive models in gesture
  • 3.The present study
    • 3.1Focus of the study: The source-path-goal image schema (“path schema”)
    • 3.2Sources of the data
  • 4.Findings
    • 4.1Path schemas in gestures for thinking
    • 4.2Path schemas in gestures for teaching
    • 4.3Incidental vs. essential path structure
    • 4.4Gesture sequences and combinations
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • References
References (49)
References
Andrén, M. (2010). Children’s gestures from 18 to 30 months. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Lund University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cienki, A. (1998a). Metaphoric gestures and some of their relations to verbal metaphoric expressions. In J.-P. Koenig (Ed.), Discourse and cognition: Bridging the gap (pp. 189–204). Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1998b). straight: An image schema and its metaphorical extensions. Cognitive Linguistics, 9 1, 107–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). Metaphors and cultural models as profiles and bases. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr., & G. J. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp. 189–203). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). Image schemas and gesture. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 421–442). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. (1985/1994). Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1997). Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1998). Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science, 22 (2), 133–187. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. (2007). Environmentally coupled gestures. In S. D. Duncan, J. Cassell, & E. T. Levy (Eds.), Gesture and the dynamic dimension of language (pp. 195–212). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hampe, B., in coop. with J. Grady (Eds.) (2005). From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hostetter, A. B. (2011). When do gestures communicate? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 137 (2), 297–315. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kita, S., Alibali, M. W., & Chu, M. (2017). How do gestures influence thinking and speaking? The gesture-for-conceptualization hypothesis. Psychological Review, 124 (3), 245–266. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ladewig, S. H. (2011). Putting the cyclic gesture on a cognitive basis. CogniTextes, 6 1, [URL].
(2014). The cyclic gesture. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & S. Tessendorf (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction, Vol. 2 1 (pp. 1605–1618). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought, 2nd ed. (pp. 202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
LeBaron, C., & Streeck, J. (2000). Gestures, knowledge, and the world. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 118–138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liddell, Scott K. (1998). Grounded blends, gestures, and conceptual shifts. Cognitive Linguistics, 9 1, 283–314. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mandler, J. M. (1992). How to build a baby: II. Conceptual primitives. Psychological Review, 99 1, 587–604. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). The foundations of mind: Origins of conceptual thought, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). How to build a baby: III. Image schemas and the transition to verbal thought. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 137–163). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mandler, J. M., & Cánovas, C. P. (2014). On defining image schemas. Language and Cognition, 6 (4), 510–532. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). Gesture and thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Why we gesture: The surprising role of hand movements in communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mittelberg, I. (2010). Geometric and image-schematic patterns in gesture space. In V. Evans & P. Chilton (Eds.), Language, cognition and space: The state of the art and new directions (pp. 351–385). London: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Gestures as image schemas and force gestalts: A dynamic systems approach augmented with motion-capture analyses. Cognitive Semiotics, 11 (1), 20180002, ISSN (Online) 2235–2066. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Núñez, R. (2007). The cognitive science of mathematics: Why is it relevant for mathematics education? In R. A. Lesh, E. Hamilton, & J. J. Kaput (Eds.), Foundations for the future in mathematics education (pp. 127–154). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinha, C. (2014). Living in the model: The cognitive ecology of time – a comparative study. In L. Magnani (Ed.), Model-based reasoning in science and technology (pp. 55–73). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, N. (2007). Gesture without interaction: Cognitive uses for a communicative capacity. Paper presented at the third conference of the International Society for Gesture Studies, Evanston, IL, June 18–21.
Streeck, J. (2011). Gesturecraft: The manu-facture of meaning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics. Vol. 1: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tessendorf, S. (2014). Pragmatic and metaphoric – combining functional and cognitive approaches in the analysis of the ‘brushing aside gesture.’ In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & S. Tessendorf (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction, vol. 2 1 (pp. 1540–1558). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Williams, R. F. (2004). Making meaning from a clock: Material artifacts and conceptual blending in time-telling instruction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007a). Counting and conceptual blending. Paper presented at the tenth International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Krakow, Poland.
(2007b). Using mapping and anchoring gestures to establish common ground. Paper presented at the third conference of the International Society for Gesture Studies, Evanston, IL, June 18–21.
(2008a). Gesture as a conceptual mapping tool. In A. Cienki & C. Müller (Eds.), Metaphor and gesture (pp. 55–92). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008b). Guided conceptualization: Mental spaces in instructional discourse. In T. Oakley & A. Hougaard (Eds.), Mental spaces in discourse and interaction (pp. 209–234). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Image schemas in clock-reading: Latent errors and emerging expertise. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21 (2), 216–246. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Distributed cognition and gesture. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & S. Tessendorf (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction, vol. 1 1 (pp. 240–258). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zlatev, J. (2005). What’s in a schema? Bodily mimesis and the grounding of language. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 313–342). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Image schemas, mimetic schemas, and children’s gestures. Cognitive Semiotics, 7 (1), 3–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Danesi, Marcel
2025. Learning, Diagrams, and AI. In Image Schema Theory and Mathematical Cognition [Mathematics in Mind, ], ► pp. 73 ff. DOI logo
Dyrmo, Tomasz
2024. Image schemas in gestural metaphorical scenarios of swearing. Multimodal Communication 13:2 ► pp. 117 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue