Article published In: Corpus Approaches to Language, Thought and Communication
Edited by Wei-lun Lu, Naděžda Kudrnáčová and Laura A. Janda
[Review of Cognitive Linguistics 17:1] 2019
► pp. 275–294
Regular articles
Conceptual metaphors and performativity in the Sunshine Policy
Published online: 20 August 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00035.kwo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00035.kwo
Abstract
This paper explores the roles of the cognitive mechanisms of conceptual metaphor and performativity in political
policy by conducting a case study on the South Korean government’s Sunshine Policy toward North Korea from 1998 to 2008. This
study contends that the policy is metaphorically motivated by an Aesop’s fable, The sun and the wind, a narrative
whose entailments have significant implications for the policy. It also systematically accounts for the policy’s performative
characteristic, focusing on the fact that the policy makers intended to map the causal relationship of the narrative onto a
real-world relationship, even though the real-world causal relationship must be based on the unknown result of the policy. Lastly,
this paper discusses theoretical implications of the performativity entangled with the conceptual metaphors in the policy; the
real-world concept is usually what limits the mapping possibilities, but in this case, the narrative structure of the fable
determines the construal.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Background
- 2.1The Sunshine Policy
- 2.2Theoretical frameworks: Conceptual metaphors and performativity
- 3.Conceptual metaphors underlying the Sunshine Policy
- 3.1Metaphors in focus
- 3.2Different conceptualizations in the attested discourse dataset
- 4.Performativity in policy
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (22)
Butler, J. (1988). Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. Theatre Journal, 40(4), 519–531.
Deignan, A., & Armstrong, S. (2015). Payback and punishment. In J. B. Herrmann & T. B. Sardinha (Eds.), Metaphor in specialist discourse (pp. 79–100). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
de Man, P. (1996). The concept of irony. In A. Warminski (Ed.), Aesthetic ideology (pp. 163–184). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Feldman, J. (2006). From molecule to metaphor: A neural theory of language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fish, S. E. (1976). How to do things with Austin and Searle: Speech act theory and literary criticism. Modern Language Notes, 911, 983–1025.
Lakoff, G. (1991). Metaphor and war: The metaphor system used to justify war in the Gulf. Paper presented at the Alumni House on the campus of the University of California at Berkeley, January 30.
(1996). Moral politics: What conservatives know that liberals don’t. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
(2006a). Thinking points: Communicating our American values and vision. New York: Tides Center/Rockridge Institute.
(2006c) [1993]. The contemporary theory of metaphor. In D. Geeraerts, (Ed.), Cognitive Linguistics: Basic readings (pp. 185–238). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2008a). The political mind: Why you can’t understand 21st-century American politics with an 18th-century brain. New York: Viking Penguin.
(2008b). The neural theory of metaphor. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 17–38). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.
Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books.
Moon, C. I. (2002). The Sunshine Policy and the Korean summit: Assessments and prospects. In T. Akaha (Ed.), The future of North Korea (pp. 26–46). London: Routledge.
Schwartz, A. (1992). Contested concepts in cognitive social science. Unpublished thesis. Berkeley: University of California.
Sullivan, K. (2013). Frames and constructions in metaphoric language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.