Article published In: Corpus Approaches to Language, Thought and Communication
Edited by Wei-lun Lu, Naděžda Kudrnáčová and Laura A. Janda
[Review of Cognitive Linguistics 17:1] 2019
► pp. 155–186
Regular articles
Evolutionary order of macro-events in Mandarin
Published online: 20 August 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00030.li
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00030.li
Abstract
This article aims to explore the evolutionary order of the five types of macro-event in Mandarin. As a methodology, a closed corpus is set up for five historical stages. The following is concluded: (1) The “V+C” constructions representing a macro-event started to appear from Stage III and continued to be used until the present stage; (2) The “V+C” constructions can only represent four out of five types of Talmy’s macro-event, and action correlating is not systematically represented; (3) The four types of macro-event appeared at a relatively similar time period, and their proportion is: Motion > State change > Temporal > Realization; (4) Verbs with PATH meaning in the V2 slot are more prone to grammaticalization than in the V1 in the serial verb construction “V1+V2”. This research is significant in bridging the areas of event structure, grammaticalization and typology, and might have implications for other languages as well.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Methodology
- 3.Evolutionary trend of the 11 simplex directional complements
- 3.1Preliminary data for the 11 directional complements
- 3.2The evolutionary trend of the 11 simplex directional complements
- 3.3Evolutionary order of macro-event types in Stage III
- 3.4Evolutionary order of macro-events in Stage IV
- 3.5Evolutionary order of macro-events in Stage V
- 4.Conclusions
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (53)
Ameka, F. K., & Essegbey, J. (2013). Serialising languages: Satellite-framed, verb-framed or neither. Ghana Journal of Linguistics, 2(1), 19–38.
Beavers, J., Levin, B., & Tham, S. W. (2010). The typology of motion expressions revisited. Journal of Linguistics, 461, 331–377.
Bohnemeyer, J., Enfield, N. J., Essegbey, J., Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., Kita, S., Lüpke, F., & Ameka, F. K. (2007). Principles of event segmentation in language: The case of motion events. Language, 831, 495–532.
Croft, W. (2010). The origins of grammaticalization in the verbalization of experience. Linguistics, 48(1), 1–48.
Croft, W., Barðdal, J., Hollmann, W., Sotirova, V., & Taoka, C. (2010). Revising Talmy’s typological classification of complex event constructions. In H. C. Boas (Ed.), Contrastive studies in Construction Grammar (pp. 201–236). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Gong, S. (2012). A contrastive study on directional verbs in Chinese and German. Quarterly Journal of Chinese Studies, 1(4), 109–135.
Heine, B. (2003). Grammaticalization. In B. D. Joseph & R. D. Janda (Eds.), The handbook of Historical Linguistics (pp. 575–601). Oxford: Blackwell.
Heine, B., & Kuteva, T. (2002). World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hopper, P. J. (1991). On some principles of grammaticalization. In E. C. Traugott & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization: Volume 11 (pp. 17–35). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hu, Z. (1996). Zuo’s
commentary. Changsha: Hunan People’s Publishing House. (胡志辉(英译),陈克烱(今译), 1996, 《左传》, 长沙:湖南人民出版社。)
Huang, Z., & Zhang, Y. (1997). The
annotation of Dunhuang literature. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company. (黄征,张涌泉编, 1997, 《敦煌变文校注》,北京:中华书局。)
Jackendoff, R. S. (1987). The status of thematic relations in linguistic theory. Linguistic Inquiry, 181, 369–411.
Levin, B., & Rappaport Hovav, M. (2005). Argument realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of Berkeley Press.
Li, T. F. (2018). Extending the Talmyan typology: A case study of the macro-event as event integration and grammaticalization in Mandarin. Cognitive Linguistics, 29(3), 585–621.
Li, F., Du, J., & Wolff, P. (2015). The linguistic representations of causing events and caused events in narrative discourse. Cognitive Semantics, 1(1), 45–76.
Li, F., Xu, M., & Cienki, A. (2015). The linguistic representations of agency in causal chains. In J. Daems, E. Zenner, K. Heylen, D. Speelman, & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), Change of paradigms – New paradoxes: Recontextualizing language and linguistics (pp. 169–188). Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter.
Liang, Y. (2001). A new sentence type of concurrent component in Pre-Qin Chinese. Chinese Linguistics, 41, 354–384.
(2007). The grammaticalization of directional verbs in Chinese. Shanghai: Xuelin Press. (梁银峰,2007,
《汉语趋向动词语法化》,上海:学林出版社。
)
Liu, Q. (2011). A new account of tales of the world. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company. (刘义庆,2011,
《世说新语》,沈海波译
,北京:中华书局。)
Liu, Y. (Ed.). (1998). A comprehensive account of directional complements. Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University Press. (刘月华,1998,
《趋向补语通释》,北京:北京语言大学出版社。
)
Muansuwan, N. (2000). Directional series verbs construction in Thai. In D. Flickinger & A. Kathol (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International HPSG Conference. Berkeley: CSLI Publications.
Peyraube, A. (2006). Motion events in Chinese: A diachronic study of directional complements. In M. Hickmann & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (pp. 121–35). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2013). On the history of Chinese directionals. In G. Peng & F. Shi (Eds.), Eastward flows the Great River: Festschrift in honor of Professor William S-Y. WANG on his 80th birthday (pp. 415–29). Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press.
Rappaport, H. M., & Levin, B. (2001). An event structure account of English resultatives. Language, 77(4), 766–797.
Ross, M. D. (2002). The grammaticalization of directional verbs in Oceanic languages. Paper presented at the Fifth Conference on Oceanic Linguistics (COOL5), Canberra, Australia.
Rubin, E. (1921). Figur und Grund In Visuell wahrgenommene Figuren. Copenhagen: Glydendalkse. Reprinted in English translation in C. Beardslee; & M. Wertheimer (Eds.), (1958). Readings in perception (pp. 194–203). Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
Schultze-Berndt, E. (2007). On manners and paths of refining Talmy’s typology of motion expressions via language documentation. In P. K. Austin, O. Bond, & D. Nathan (Eds.), Proceedings of Conference on Language Documentation and Linguistic Theory (pp. 223–233). London: SOAS.
Shi, W., & Wu, Y. (2014). Which way to move: The evolution of motion expressions in Chinese. Linguistics, 52(5), 1237–1292.
Slobin, D. I. (2004). The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (pp. 219–257). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Slobin, D. I., & Hoiting, N. (1994). Reference to movement in spoken and signed languages: Typological consideration. Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS), 201, 487–505.
Talmy, L. (1972). Semantic structures in English and Atsugewi. Ph.D dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
(1975a). Figure and ground in complex sentences. In Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 419–430). Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
(1975b). Semantics and syntax of motion. In J. Kimball (Ed.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 41 (pp. 181–238). New York: Academic Press.
(1978). Figure and ground in complex sentences. In J. Greenberg, C. Ferguson, & J. Moravcsik (Eds.), Universals of human language, vol. 41 (pp. 627–649). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
(1985a). Figure and ground as thematic roles. Paper presented at the 1985 Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Seattle.
(1985b). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon (pp. 57–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(1985c). Force dynamics in language and thought. In W. H. Eilfort, P. D. Kroeber, & K. L. Peterson (Eds.), Proceedings of the Parasession on Causatives and Agentivity (Chicago Linguistic Society 21) (pp. 293–337). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, University of Chicago.
(1991). Path to realization: A typology of event integration. Buffalo Working Papers in Linguistics, 91–011, 147–87.
(2000a). Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Volume I1: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
(2000b). Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Volume II1: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Traugott, E. C., & Dasher, R. (2002). Regularity in semantic change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wang, S. (2004). I’m your daddy. Yunnan: Yunnan People’s Publishing House. (王朔,2004,《我是你爸爸》,云南:云南人民出版社。)
Wang, Y. (2011). Study on the orientation of verbs and the pedagogy of directional verbs. Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University Press. (王媛,2011
《动词的方向性研究与趋向动词教学》,
北京:北京语言大学出版社。)
Yuan, Y. (1989). On quasi-double-valency verbs. Linguistics Research, 11, 12–25. (
袁毓林,1989,
准双向动词研究,《语言研究》第
11
期
:12–25。)
Zhao, X., & Liu, Z. (2014). Constraints on the functional extension of the quasi-double-valency verbs: A case of the interactions between verbs and clause structures. Studies of the Chinese Language, 21, 149–156. (赵旭,刘振平, 2014,
准双向动词功能扩展的制约因素,《中国语文》第
21
期
:149–156
。)
Cited by (9)
Cited by nine other publications
Liu, Yuanmeng, Na Liu & Fuyin Thomas Li
Yang, Yuhang & Fuyin Thomas Li
Zhang, Cuiying & Fuyin Thomas Li
Li, Fuyin Thomas
2024. Image schemas and (point)-to-point event model for the macro-event. Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Liu, Na & Fuyin Thomas Li
2023. Review of Lin (2019): Encoding motion events in Mandarin Chinese. A cognitive functional study. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 21:1 ► pp. 323 ff.
Liu, Na & Fuyin Thomas Li
Li, Xiangling
Zhang, Yuan
Li, Fuyin Thomas & Na Liu
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
