Cover not available

Article published In: Corpus Approaches to Language, Thought and Communication
Edited by Wei-lun Lu, Naděžda Kudrnáčová and Laura A. Janda
[Review of Cognitive Linguistics 17:1] 2019
► pp. 131–154

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required
Special issue articles

Construction in conversation

An Interactional Construction Grammar approach to the use of xiangshuo ‘think’ in spoken Taiwan Mandarin

 | National Taiwan University (NTU)
 | National Taiwan University (NTU)
Published online: 20 August 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00029.hsi
Abstract
Although the Construction Grammar (CxG) model has yielded fruitful findings, the role that pragmatics plays in language has not yet been fully considered in this theoretical framework. The recent development of spoken corpora, however, enables construction grammarians to develop a new approach called Interactional Construction Grammar, which incorporates interactional factors into CxG analysis to account for patterns that involve interpersonal functions and global contexts. Adopting this approach, the present study attempts to examine the use of a complement-taking mental predicate xiangshuo in Taiwan Mandarin conversation and analyze the co-occurrence patterns of this cognitive verb with different subjects. We identify three sequential patterns in which xiangshuo most frequently occurs, including account-giving, contrast-projecting and involvement-constructing, and argue that only by taking into account the sequential context and interactional function can the distribution patterns of subjects and particles that recurrently collocate with xiangshuo be explained.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Previous research on xiangshuo
  • 3.Data and methodology
  • 4.The co-occurrence patterns of xiangshuo and different subjects
  • 5.Sequential patterns of xiangshuo in interaction
    • 5.1The account-giving sequence
    • 5.2The contrast-projecting sequence
    • 5.3The involvement-constructing sequence
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • Transcription conventions
  • References
References (41)
References
Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2004). Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Antonopoulou, E., & Nikiforidou, K. (2011). Construction grammar and conventional discourse: A construction-based approach to discoursal incongruity. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(10), 2594–2609. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barnes, R., & Moss, D. (2007). Communicating a feeling: The social organization of private thoughts. Discourse Studies, 9(2), 123–148. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biq, Y. O. (1991). The multiple uses of the second person singular pronoun ni in conversational Mandarin. Journal of Pragmatics, 16(4), 307–321. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Construction, reanalysis, and stance: ‘V yi ge N’and variations in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(9), 1655–1672. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chang, M. H. (2015). Two counter-expectation markers in Chinese. In J. E. Díaz-Vera (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy across time and cultures (pp. 141–170). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2007). Assessing and accounting. In E. Holt & R. Clift (Eds.), Reporting talk: Reported speech in interaction (pp. 81–119). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W. (2001). Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Du Bois, J. W., Schuetze-Coburn, S., Cumming, S., & Paolino, D. (1993). Outline of discourse transcription. In J. A. Edwards & M. D. Lampert (Eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research (pp. 45–89). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. (1988). The mechanisms of “Construction Grammar”. In Proceedings of the Fourteen Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 35–55). Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J., Kay, P., & O’Connor, M. C. (1988). Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone . Language, 64(3), 501–538. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, B. A. (2007). Principles shaping grammatical practices: An exploration. Discourse Studies, 9(3), 299–318. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fried, M., & Östman, J. O. (2005). Construction Grammar and spoken language: The case of pragmatic particles. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(11), 1752–1778. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. New York: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J., & Traugott, E. C. (2003). Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hsieh, C. Y. C. (2011). Meaning in interaction: The use of abstract nouns and the co-construction of stance in conversation. Paper presented at the ELSJ International Spring Forum 2011, Shizuoka University, Hamamatsu City.
Hsieh, F., & Huang, S. (2005). Grammar, construction, and social action: A study of the qíshí construction. Language and Linguistics, 6(4), 599–634.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, S. (2003). Doubts about complementation: A functionalist analysis. Language and Linguistics, 4(2), 429–455.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Imo, W. (2015). Interactional construction grammar. Linguistics Vanguard, 1(1), 69–77. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iwasaki, S. (1993). Subjectivity in grammar and discourse: Theoretical considerations and a case study of Japanese spoken discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jefferson, G. (2004). “At first I thought”: A normalizing device for extraordinary events. In G. H. Learner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 131–167). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, M. S. (2014). Reported thought as a stance-taking device in Korean conversation. Discourse Processes, 51(3), 230–263. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kärkkäinen, E. (2012). I thought it was very interesting. Conversational formats for taking a stance. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(15), 2194–2210. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, N., & Thompson, S. A. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lim, N. E. (2011). From subjectivity to intersubjectivity: Epistemic marker wo juede in Chinese. In Y. Xiao, L. Tao, & H. L. Soh (Eds.), Current issues in Chinese linguistics (pp. 265–300). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Linell, P. (2009). Grammatical constructions in dialogue. In A. Bergs & G. Diewald (Eds.), Contexts and constructions (pp. 97–110). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norrick, N. R. (2004). Humor, tellability, and conarration in conversational storytelling. Text, 24(1), 79–112. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sanders, R., & Uehara, S. (2006). Thinking about xiang 3 in Taiwan: Some native-speaker opinions. Paper presented at the 17th North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics.
(2004). Inclusive and exclusive patterning of the English first person plural: Evidence from conversation. In M. Achard & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Language, culture and mind (pp. 377–396). Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Subjective and intersubjective usees of generalizations in Engilsh conversations. In R. Englebretson (Ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction (pp. 111–138). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Selting, M., & Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2001). Studies in interactional linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stirling, L., & Manderson, L. (2011). About you: Empathy, objectivity and authority. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(6), 1581–1602. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tao, H. (2000). Adverbs of absolute time and assertiveness in vernacular Chinese: A corpus-based study. Journal of Chinese Language Teachers Association, 35(2), 53–74.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Bogaer, J. (2011). I think and other complement-taking mental predicates: A case of and for constructional grammaticalization. Linguistics, 49(2), 295–332. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Waring, H. Z. (2007). The multi-functionality of accounts in advice giving. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11(3), 367–391. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wide, C. (2009). Interactional Construction Grammar: Contextual features of determination in dialectal Swedish. In A. Bergs & G. Diewald (Eds.), Contexts and constructions (pp. 111–142). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zima, E., & Brône, G. (2015). Cognitive Linguistics and interactional discourse: Time to enter into dialogue. Language and Cognition, 7(4), 485–498. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Zeng, Guocai
2021. Repetition in Mandarin-speaking children’s dialogs: its distribution and structural dimensions. Linguistics Vanguard 7:1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue