Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 8:4 (2017) ► pp.542–570

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

The question of power in language classes from a critical discourse analysis perspective

Once a student, always a student?

 | Kharazmi University
 | Iran Language Institute (ILI)
 | Kharazmi University
Published online: 19 January 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.8.4.04bab
Abstract
Informed by the major tenets of critical discourse analysis, the present study attempted to expose the chasm between veteran English teachers enjoying a nation-wide popularity and those linguistically talented novices achieving locally mediocre fame in the Iranian EFL context. In so doing, two highly competent English teachers, each as a prime example of the above-mentioned camps, were selected to serve as the main participants of the research. The analysis of their classroom talk indicated that linguistic excellence could not fulfill the role of educated experience as far as discourse competence was concerned. In all, the discursive strategies used by the experienced teacher seemed to manifest his recognition of students' voices and created a more heteroglossic atmosphere in the classroom.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Review of the related literature
    • 2.1Classroom discourse
    • 2.2Critical discourse analysis
    • 2.3Critical classroom discourse analysis
  • 3.Method
    • 3.1Participants and class format
    • 3.2Data collection procedure and data analysis
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Experiential value in vocabulary
      • 4.1.1Rewording
      • 4.1.2Overwording
    • 4.2Relational value in vocabulary
      • 4.2.1Euphemism
      • 4.2.2Classification schemes
      • 4.2.3Formality
    • 4.3Expressive value in vocabulary
    • 4.4Connective value in vocabulary
      • 4.4.1Metaphor
    • 4.5Experiential value in grammar
      • 4.5.1Agency
      • 4.5.2Negation
    • 4.6Relational value in grammar
      • 4.6.1Imperatives
      • 4.6.2Modality
      • 4.6.3Inclusive we
      • 4.6.4Processes
      • 4.6.5Turn-taking moves
    • 4.7The relational values of interactional conventions
      • 4.7.1Connective value in grammar
      • 4.7.2Interruption and controlling topic
      • 4.7.3Enforcing explicitness and formulation
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • References
References (28)
References
Baker, Paul. 2006. Using corpora in discourse analysis. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, Paul and Sibonile Ellece. 2011. Key terms in discourse analysis. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barnes, Douglas. 1969. “Language in the secondary classroom”. In Language, the learner and the school, ed. by Douglas Barnes, James Britton, and Harold Rosen. 11–77.Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bellack, Arno A., Herbert Kliebard, Ronald Hyman, and Frank Smith. 1966. The language of the classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brookfield, Stephen. 2005. The power of critical theory for adult learning and teaching. Berkshire: Open University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis. Boston: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Language and Power (2nd ed.). Harlow, U.K.: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flanders, Ned A. 1970. Analyzing teaching behavior. Boston: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fisher, Ros and Shirley Larkin. 2008. “Pedagogy or ideological struggle? An examination of pupils’ and teachers’ expectations for talk in the classroom.” Language and Education 22 (1): 1–16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fröhlich, Maria, Nina Spada, and Patrick Allen. 1985. “Differences in the communicative orientation of L2 classrooms.” TESOL Quarterly 19 (1): 28–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gee, James Paul. 1996. The social linguistics and literacies: Ideology discourses. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. “Discourse analysis: what makes it critical?” In An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education, ed. by Rebecca Rogers. 19–50. Mahwah, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hofstede, Geert. 2001. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Berkeley, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hunt, Kellogg W. 1970. “Syntactic maturity in schoolchildren and adults.” Society for the Research in Child Development Monograph 134 (1): 1–67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kumaravadivelu, B. 1999. “Critical classroom discourse analysis.” TESOL Quarterly 33(3): 453–84. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 2000. Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marcuse, Herbert. 1964. One-dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matusov, Eugene. 2007. “Applying Bakhtin scholarship on discourse in education: A critical review essay”. Educational Theory 57(2): 215–237. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Menard-Warwick, Julia. 2008. “Because she made beds every day: Social positioning, classroom discourse, and language learning.” Applied Linguistics 29 (2): 267–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Partington, Alan. 2004. “Corpora and discourse, a most congruous beast.” In Corpora and discourse, ed. by Alan Partington, John Morley, and Louann Haarman, 11–20. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin and Ruth Wodak. 2001. Discourse and discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Anti-Semitism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinclair, John and Malcolm Coulthard. 1975. Towards an analysis of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun. 1998. Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. “Multidisciplinary CDA: A plea for diversity”. In Methods of critical discourse analysis by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 95–120. London: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walsh, Steve. 2006. Investigating classroom discourse. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2001. “What CDA is about – a summary of its history, important concepts and its developments.” In Methods of critical discourse analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 1–13. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Ting, Chai
2025. Power Dynamics in Language Classrooms: A Bibliometric Review and Its Implications for Education. Journal of Higher Education Teaching 2:2 ► pp. 150 ff. DOI logo
Abdala, Jafari
2024. Teachers’ questions and learners’ responses in teaching and learning English as a foreign language in Tanzania’s secondary schools. SN Social Sciences 4:12 DOI logo
Hieronimus Canggung Darong
2024. Illocutionary Acts in EFL Teaching: Balancing Authority and Engagement. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics 15:3 ► pp. 684 ff. DOI logo
刘, 心语
2021. A Study on the Teacher-Student Power Relation in Webinar Classes—A Case Study of a Graduate Course. Modern Linguistics 09:05 ► pp. 1315 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue