Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 8:4 (2017) ► pp.498–519

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Variations in the use of metaphor at the macro-contextual level

The case of English press news

 | Wenzao Ursuline University of Languages, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
Published online: 19 January 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.8.4.02shi
Abstract
This article investigates linguistic metaphors in four English newspapers from the perspective of Conceptual Metaphor Theory, focusing on their variations at the macro-contextual level. Analyzed in their respective macro contexts were lexicalized and non-lexicalized metaphors in 1,105 full-length news stories. The exploration reveals that: (i) the distributions of non-lexicalized metaphors are far more variable than those of lexicalized metaphors across the four newspapers, (ii) lexicalized metaphors are much more common than non-lexicalized metaphors in all the four newspapers, (iii) non-lexicalized metaphors occur more in the news stories for native speakers than in those for international or global readers, with a decreasing tendency toward those for EOL and EFL readers, and (iv) the lexicalized and non-lexicalized metaphors both have cognitive functions, while the latter serve additional stylistic purposes. The study sheds some light on the affordance between linguistic metaphors and the macro contexts of the news stories.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical framework
  • 3.Relevant categories of metaphors
  • 4.Data and methodological procedure
  • 5.Results and discussion
  • 6.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
References (48)
References
Bowdle, Brian F. & Dedre Gentner. 2005. The career of metaphor. Psychological Review 112 (1): 193–216. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2005. Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cameron, Lynn. 2003. Metaphor in educational discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Capone, Alessandro. 2010. Introduction. Journal of Pragmatics 42 (11): 2861–2869. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2002). Second language figurative proficiency: a comparative study of Malay and English. Applied Linguistics 23 (1): 104–133. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. Speaking with forked tongue: A comparative study of metaphor and metonymy in English and Malay phraseology. Metaphor and Symbol 18 (4): 289–310. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Christmanna, Ursula, Lena Wimmera & Nobert Groebenb. 2011. The aesthetic paradox in processing conventional and non-conventional metaphors. Scientific Study of Literature 1 (2): 199–240. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Danesi, Marcel. 1992. Metaphorical competence in second language acquisition research and language teaching: The neglected dimension. In J. Alatis (Ed.), Georgetown University Round Table On Languages And Linguistics (pp. 489–500). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deignan, Alice. 2003. Metaphorical expressions and culture: An indirect link. Metaphor and Symbol 18 (4), 255–271. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Corpus linguistic data and conceptual metaphor theory. In M. S. Zanotto, L. Cameron, & M. C. Cavalcanti (Eds.), Confronting metaphor in use: An applied linguistic approach (pp. 149–162). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, Ray W. 1994. The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1999). Taking metaphor out of our heads and putting it into the cultural world. In R. W. Gibbs & G. J. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp.145–166). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2011). Evaluating conceptual metaphor theory. Discourse Processes, 481: 529–562. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grady, Joseph. 1997. THEORIES ARE BUILDINGS revisited. Cognitive Linguistics 8 (4): 267–290. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grimes, William. 2013. The New York Times: The times of the eighties: The Culture, politics, and personalities that shaped the decade. New York: Black Dog & Leventhal Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, Mark. 1987. The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kachru, Braj B. 1985). Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In R. Quirk & H. Widdowson (Eds.), English in the world (pp. 11–32). London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kecskes, Istvan. 2007. Formulaic language in English Lingua Franca. In I. Kecskes & L. R. Horn (Eds.), Explorations in pragmatics: Linguistic, cognitive and intercultural aspects (pp. 191–218). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán. 2002. Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005). Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press., Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010). A new look at metaphorical creativity in cognitive linguistics. Cognitive Linguistics 21 (4), 663–697. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015). Where metaphors come from: Reconsidering context in metaphor. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1993. The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.). pp. 202–251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Mark Turner. 1989. More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Littlemore, Jeannette. 2003. The effect of cultural background on metaphor interpretation. Metaphor and Symbol 18 (4): 273–288. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. The misinterpretation of metaphors by international students at a British university: Examples, implications, and possible remedies. Humanising Language Teaching 6 (3). Retrieved February 6, 2015, from [URL]
Littlemore, Jeannette, Phyllis T. Chen, Almut Koester & John Barnden. 2011. Difficulties in metaphor comprehension faced by international students whose first language is not English. Applied Linguistics 321: 408–429. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Littlemore, Jeannette & Graham Low. 2006. Metaphoric competence, second language learning and communicative language ability. Applied Linguistics 27 (2): 268–294. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Neill-Brown, Patricia. 1999. When agents meet cross-cultural metaphor: Can they be equipped to parse and generate it? In C. L. Nehaniv (Ed.), Computation for Metaphors, Analogy, and Agents (pp. 165–175). Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paprotté, Wolf, & René Dirven (Eds.). 1985. The ubiquity of metaphor: Metaphor in language and thought. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pragglejaz Group. 2007. MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol 22 (1): 1–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rainer, Franz, Wolfgang U. Dressler, Francesco Gardani & Hans Christian Luschützky. 2014. Morphology and meaning: An overview. In F. Rainer, F. Gardani, H. C. Luschützky & W. U. Dressler (Eds.), Morphology and meaning (pp. 3–46). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco J., & Lorena Pérez Hernández. 2011. The contemporary theory of metaphor: Myths, developments and challenges. Metaphor and Symbol 26 (3): 161–185. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shie, Jian-Shiung. 2011. Metaphors and metonymies in New York Times and Times Supplement news headlines. Journal of Pragmatics 43 (5): 1318–1334. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. The alignment of generic discourse units in news stories. Text & Talk 32 (5): 661–679. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shie, Jian-Shiung & Chang, J. -F. (in press). Linguistic materiality and conceptual metaphoricity in English picture books for children. In M. -Y. Tseng (Ed.), Language as material. Kaohsiung, Taiwan: Center for the Humanities, National Sun Yat-sen University.
Steen, Gerard, Aletta Dorst, J. Berenike Herrmann, Anna Kaal, Tina Krennmayr & Trijntje Pasma. 2010a. A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010b. Metaphor in usage. Cognitive Linguistics 21 (4): 765–796. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol. 2005. The function of metaphor: Developing a corpus-based perspective. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 10 (2): 161–198. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Svanlund, Jan. 2007. Metaphor and convention. Cognitive Linguistics 18 (1): 47–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turner, Mark. 1991. Reading minds: The study of English in the age of cognitive science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Woodhams, Jay M. 2014. ‘We’re the nurses’: Metaphor in the discourse of workplace socialization. Language & Communication, 341:56–68. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watson, Gregory. 1999. Evidentiality and affect: A quantitative approach. Language and Literature, 8 (3), 217–240. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue