Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 8:3 (2017) ► pp.400–420

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

But as a stance marker in Nigerian investigative public hearings

 | Redeemer’s University, Ede, Nigeria
Published online: 27 October 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.8.3.04unu
Abstract
This study examines the kinds of stance that but as a contrastive marker signals in Nigerian investigative public hearings, with a view to exploring the contexts in which the stances are made. The study examines forty purposively selected investigative public hearing sessions which involve interactions between complainants, defendants and a hearing panel. The data are analysed qualitatively utilising Du Bois, John W. 2007. “The Stance Triangle.” In Stancetaking in Discourse, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar interactional view of stance and Martin, J. R. & Peter White. 2005. the Language age of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar Appraisal system. Results indicate that but signals epistemic, evidential, emotive and evaluative stances within the narrative, interrogative and closing contexts. These stances and their contextual patterns depend heavily on the roles, goals and knowledge of the participants as stancetakers who position themselves, and align with other participants and the wider discourse community in order to express evaluation and intersubjective positioning.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.A brief background to the Nigerian federal capital territory (FCT) administration hearings
  • 3.Theoretical considerations
  • 4.Method
  • 5.Analysis and findings
    • 5.1The discursive context of but in the hearings
      • 5.1.1Narrative context
      • 5.1.2Interrogative context
      • 5.1.3Closing context
    • 5.2But and stance
      • 5.2.1 But signalling epistemic stance
      • 5.2.2 But and evidential stance
      • 5.2.3 But signalling evaluative stance
      • 5.2.4 But indexing affective stance
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
References (43)
References
Aijmer, Karin. 2013. Understanding Pragmatic Markers: A Variational Pragmatic Approach. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aull, L. Laura, and Zak Lancaster. 2014. “Linguistic Markers of Stance in Early and Advanced Academic Writings: A corpus-based comparison.” Written Communication 32(2):151–183. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination (translated by C. Emerson & M. Holquist). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baratta, Alexander M. 2009. “Revealing Stance through Passive Voice.” Journal of Pragmatics 411: 1406–1421. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berlin, Lawrence N. 2007. “Cooperative Conflict and Evasive Language: The Case of the 9–11 Commission Hearings.” In Context and Appropriateness, ed. by A. Fetzer, 167–199. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008. “‘I Think, Therefore …’ Commitment in Political Testimony.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 27 (4): 372–383. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bernard, Taryn. 2009. Justificatory Discourse of the Perpetrator in TRC Testimonies: A discourse-historical Analysis. Unpublished MA Thesis. Stellenbosch University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 2006. “Stance in Spoken and Written University Registers.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 51: 97–116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bock, Zanni. 2007. A Discourse Analysis of Selected Truth and Reconciliation Commission Testimonies: Appraisal and Genre. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of the Western Cape.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. “‘Language has a heart’: Linguistic markers of evaluation in selected TRC testimonies.” Language of Multicultural Discourses 3(3):189–203. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bock, Zanni, Ngwanya Mazwi, Sifundo Metula, and Nosisi Mpolweni-Zantsi. 2006. “An Analysis of What Has Been ‘Lost’ in the Interpretation and Transcription Process of Selected TRC Testimonies.” Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics PLUS 331:1–26.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cavalieri, Silvia. 2009. “Reformulation and Conflict in the Witness Examination: The case of Public Inquiries.” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 22 (2): 209–221. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 2007. “The Stance Triangle.” In Stancetaking in Discourse, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W., Stephan Schuetze-Coburn, Susanna Cumming, & Danae Paolino. 1993. “Outline of discourse transcription.” In Talking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research ed. by Jane A. Edwards & Martin D. Lampert, 45–89. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Englebretson, Robert. 2007. “Stancetaking in Discourse: An Introduction.” In Stancetaking in Discourse, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 1–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 1996. “Pragmatic Markers.” Pragmatics 6 (2): 167–190. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. “Towards a Theory of Discourse Markers.” In Approaches to Discourse Particles, ed. by K. Fischer, 189–204. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “An Account of Discourse Markers.” International Review of Pragmatics 11: 293–320. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. “The Sequencing of Contrastive Discourse Markers in English.” Baltic Journal of English Language, Literature and Culture 11: 29–35Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “Combinations of Contrastive Discourse Markers in English.” International Review of Pragmatics 51: 318–340. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. “The Combining of Discourse Markers.” Journal of Pragmatics 861: 48–53, Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gray, Bethany and Douglas Biber. 2015. “Stance Markers.” In Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook, ed. by Karin Aijmer and Christoph Rühlemann, 219–248 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2005. “Stance and Engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse.” Discourse Studies 7 (2): 173–192. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keisanen, Tina and Elise Kärkkäinen 2014. “Stance.” In Pragmatics of Discourse, ed. by Klaus P. Schneider and Anne Baron, 295–322. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. & Peter White. 2005. the Language age of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mei, S. Wu. 2006. “Creating a Contrastive Rhetorical Stance: Investigating the Strategy of Problemitisation in Students’ Argumentation.” RELC 37 (3): 329–353. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meinig, Bob. 1998. Public Hearings: When and How to Hold Them. MRSC Publications. Retrieved June 2, 2008 from [URL]
Mey, Jacob L. 2001. Pragmatics: An Introduction. Malden: Blackwell PublishersGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szczyrbak, Magdalena. 2014. “Stancetaking Strategies in Judicial Discourse: Evidence from US Supreme Court Opinions.” Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis 1311: 91–120.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
The Law Reform Commission (2003). Consultation Paper on Public Inquiries including Tribunals of Inquiry. Dublin: The Law Reform Commission.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Unuabonah, Foluke. 2011. “Event Models: A Socio-Cognitive Study of Selected Interrogations in 2008 Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing on Federal Capital Territory (FCT) Administration In Nigeria.” Studies in Literature and Language 3 (1): 37–44.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012a. “The Generic Structure of Presentations in Quasi-Judicial Public Hearings on the FCT Administration in Nigeria in 2008.” California Linguistic Notes 37 (2): 1–23.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012b. Interaction Structure and Pragmatic Features in 2008 National Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing on Federal Capital Territory Administration in Nigeria. Unpublished PhD Thesis. University of Ibadan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. “Contextual Beliefs in a Nigerian Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing”. Journal of Asian and African studies 5 (5): 619-633. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. “The Generic Structure of a Public Hearing.” In Essays on Language, Communication and Literature in Africa, ed. by Akin Odebunmi and Joyce Mathangwane, 105–130. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verdoolaege, Annelies. 2009a. “The Audience as Actor: The Participation Status of the Audience at the Victim Hearings of the South African TRC”. Discourse Studies, 11(4): 441–463. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009b. “Dealing with a Traumatic Past: The Victim Hearings of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission and their Reconciliation Discourse”. Critical Discourse Studies 6(4): 297–309. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
White, Peter R. R. 2011. “Appraisal.” In Discursive Pragmatics ed. by Jan Zienkowski, Jan-Ola Östman and Jef Verschueren, 14–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Daniel, Florence Oluwaseyi
2025. “But I think, with respect, that the trial court was wrong”: but signalling stance in Nigerian Supreme Court Judgements. Folia Linguistica DOI logo
Jowitt, David & Kingsley O. Ugwuanyi
2025. Nigerian English research: Developments and directions. World Englishes DOI logo
Cai, Siying, Wenzhong Zhu & Yuting Wang
2023. Corpus analysis of evaluative language and framework implementation for pharmaceutical industryCSRreports. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 30:4 ► pp. 2037 ff. DOI logo
Olayinka Unuabonah, Foluke
2020. Argumentation in Nigerian investigative public hearings. Journal of Argumentation in Context 9:2 ► pp. 199 ff. DOI logo
Unuabonah, Foluke O.
2018. Direct quotations in Nigerian investigative public hearings . Text & Talk 38:4 ► pp. 503 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue