Article published In: Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 8:2 (2017) ► pp.281–311
Metaphors of parliamentary budget debates in times of crisis
The case of the UK and the Montenegrin parliament
Published online: 10 August 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.8.2.06sta
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.8.2.06sta
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to explore the metaphoric imprint the global financial crisis has left on the discourse of parliamentary budget debates, which are at the intersection of political and economic discourse, as well as the imprint the MPs have tried to leave on the electorate by carefully selecting metaphors to hide agency, disclaim responsibility and project themselves as saviours. We focus both on conceptual and linguistic metaphors, trying, simultaneously, to account for how the metaphors are developed in the debate. The corpus comprises two budget debates held at the time the financial crisis was in full swing (conducted in the Parliament of Montenegro and the UK House of Commons). The recurrent conceptual metaphors related to the economic crisis were analysed for the two parts of the corpus respectively – the results were compared and similarities were observed in terms of the metaphors used and the discourse strategies behind their selection.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Theoretical background
- 2.1Parliamentary discourse
- 2.2Metaphor in cognitive linguistics
- Conceptual metaphor and politics
- Conceptual metaphor and the economy
- Metaphor development in talk
- 3.Data and methodology
- 4.The Montenegrin data
- 5.The UK data
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (53)
Anderson, Richard. 2004. “The Causal Power of Metaphor in Politics: Cueing Democratic Identities in Russia and Beyond.” In Metaphorical World Politics: Rhetorics of Democracy, War and Globalization, ed. by Francis Beer and Christ'l De Landtsheer, 91–120. East Lansing, Mich.: Michigan University Press
Archakis, Argiris, and Villy Tsakona. 2010. “'The Wolf Wakes up inside Them, Grows Werewolf Hair and Reveals All Their Bullying': The Representation of Parliamentary Discourse in Greek Newspapers”. Journal of Pragmatics 421: 912–923.
Bailey, Richard. 2003. “Conceptual Metaphor, Language, Literature and Pedagogy.” Journal of Language and Learning 1 (2): 59–72.
Bayley, Paul. 2004. “The Whys and Wherefores of Analysing Parliamentary Discourse.” In Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse, ed. by Paul Bayley, 1–44. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Cameron, Lynne. 2008. “Metaphor Shifting in the Dynamics of Talk”. In Confronting Metaphor in Use: An Applied Linguistic Approach, ed. by Mara Sophia Zanotto, Lynne Cameron and Marinda Cavalcanti, 45–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2000. “Metaphor and Vocabulary Reaching in ESP Economics”. English for Specific Purposes: An International Journal 19 (2): 149–165.
Chifane, Cristina. 2013. “Metaphors of the Crisis – A Reflection of the Global Financial Situation.” Management Strategies Journal 22 (4): 78–84.
Chilton, Paul, and Mikhail Ilyin. 1993. “Metaphor in Political Discourse: The Case of the ‘Common European House’”. Discourse & Society 4 (7): 7–31.
Chung, Siaw-Fong, and Kathleen Ahrens. 2004. “Teaching Economy Metaphors: A Psycholinguistic Perspective through the CMM.” In the Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Symposium and Book Fair on English Teaching, Vol. 21, 1–12. Taipei, Taiwan: English Teachers Association.
Cortés de los Ríos, María Enriqueta. 2010. “Cognitive Devices to Communicate the Economic Crisis: An Analysis through Covers in the Economist.” Ibérica: Revista de la Asociación Europea de Lenguas para Fines Específicos (AELFE) 201: 81–106.
Dorst, Aletta G. 2011. Metaphor in fiction: Language, Thought and Communication. Oisterwijk, Netherlands: BOXpress.
Ferrari, Federica. 2007. “Metaphor at Work in the Analysis of Political Discourse: Investigating a ‘Preventive War’ Persuasion Strategy”. Discourse & Society 18 (5): 603–625.
Gadavanij, Savitri. 2002. “Intertextuality as Discourse Strategy: The Case of No-Confidence Debates in Thailand”. Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics 91: 35–55.
Gelabert-Desnoyer, Jaime. 2008. “Not So Impersonal: Intentionality in the Use of Pronoun Uno in Contemporary Spanish Political Discourse”. Pragmatics 18 (3): 407–424.
Hanks, Patrick. 2006. “Metaphoricity is Gradable”. In Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy, ed. by Anatol Stefanowitsch and Stefan Gries, 17–35. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hart, Christopher. 2005. “Analysing Political Discourse: Toward a Cognitive Approach”. Critical Discourse Studies 2 (2): 189–94.
Heritage, John. 1985. “Analysing News Interviews: Aspects of the Production of Talk for an “Overhearing” Audience”. In Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Vol. III1, ed. by Teun van Dijk, 95–119. London: Academic Press.
Herrmann, J. Berenike. 2013. Metaphor in Academic Discourse: Linguistic Forms, Conceptual Structures, Communicative Functions and Cognitive Representations. LOT Dissertation Series, 333. Utrecht: Utrecht Univversity/LOT.
Huang, Chu-Ren, Siaw-Fong Chung, and Kathleen Ahrens. 2006. “An Ontology-Based Exploration of Knowledge Systems for Metaphor.” In Ontologies: A Handbook of Principles, Concepts and Applications in Information Systems. Volume 141, ed. by Raj Sharman, Rajiv Kishore, and Ram Ramesh, 489–517. New York: Springer.
Ilie, Cornelia. 2003. “Discourse and Metadiscourse in Parliamentary Debates”. Journal of Language and Politics 2 (1): 71–92.
. 2004. “Insulting as (Un)Parliamentary Practice in the British and Swedish Parliaments: A Rhetorical Approach. In Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse, ed. by Paul Bayley, 45–86. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Kövecses, Zoltán. 2010. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Lakoff, George. 2003. “Metaphor and War, Again”. [URL] (accessed on 27.01.2010)
Lakoff, George, and Mark Turner. 1989. More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Moser, Karin. 2004. “The Role of Metaphors in Acquiring and Transmitting Knowledge”. In European Perspectives on Learning at Work: The Acquisition of Work Process Knowledge, ed. by Martin Fischer, Nicholas Boreham, and Barry Nyhan, 148–165. Luxembourg: European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training.
Muller, Cornelia. 2008. Metaphors Dead and Alive, Sleeping and Waking. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Müller, Ralph. 2005. “Creative Metaphors in Political Discourse. Theoretical Considerations on the Basis of Swiss Speeches”. Metaphoric.de 91: 53–73.
Musolff, Andreas. 2004. Metaphor and Political Discourse: Analogical Reasoning in Debates about Europe. London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
. 2012. “The Study of Metaphor as Part of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Critical Discourse Studies 9 (3): 301–310.
Mutua, Makau. 2001. “Savages, Victims, and Saviors: The Metaphor of Human Rights.” Harvard International Law Journal 42 (1): 201–245.
O’Connor, Kathleen Therese. 1998. “Money and Finance as Solid, Liquid, and Gas in Spanish”. Metaphor and Symbol 13 (2): 141–157.
Orts, María Angeles, and Ana Rojo. 2009. “Metaphor Framing in Spanish Economic Discourse: A Corpus-Based Approach to Metaphor Analysis in the Global Systemic Crisis”. In A Survey of Corpus-Based Research [Recurso electrónico], ed. by Pascual Cantos Gómez and Aquilino Sánchez Pérez, 182–195. Universidad de Murcia: AELINCO.
Pasma, Tryntje. 2011. Metaphor and Register Variation: The Personalisation of Dutch News Discourse. Oisterwijk, Netherlands: BOXpress.
Rasiah, Parameswary. 2007. Evasion in Australia’s Parliamentary Question Time. Perth: University of Western Australia.
Ritchie, David. 2003. “
argument is war – Or Is It a Game of Chess? Multiple Meanings in the Analysis of Implicit Metaphors.” Metaphor and Symbol 18 (2): 125–146.
Rječnik srpskohrvatskoga književnog jezika ['Dictionary of written Serbo-Croatian']. 1967. Novi Sad & Zagreb: Matica srpska i Matica hrvatska.
Semino, Elena, and Michela Masci. 1996. “Politics is Football: Metaphor in the Discourse of Silvio Berlusconi in Italy”. Discourse and Society 7 (2): 243–269.
Shenhav, Shaul. 2008. “Showing and Telling in Parliamentary Discourse: The Case of Repeated Interjections to Rabin’s Speeches in the Israeli Parliament”. Discourse and Society 19(2): 223–255.
Silaški, Nadežda and Tatjana Đurović. 2010. “The Conceptualisation of the Global Financial Crisis via the Economy Is a Person Metaphor – A Contrastive Study of English and Serbian”. Belgrade: Facta Universitatis, Series: Linguistics and Literature 8 (2): 129–139.
Silaški, Nadežda. 2013. “Translating Metaphorical Economic Terms from English into Serbian – Some Strategies and Challenges.” In Philological Reasearch Today – Language, Literature and Communication: Current Issues in Linguistic Research, ed. by Julijana Vučo and Vesna Polovina, 351–370. Belgrade: University of Belgrade.
Silaški, Nadežda and Annamaria Kilyeni. 2014. “The Money is Solid Metaphor in Economic and Business Terminology in English.” Professional Communication and Translation Studies 71: 73–80.
Škara, Danica. 2009. “Jezična/mentalna rekonstrukcija EU prostora: nove konceptualne metafore“. ['Linguistic/mental reconstruction of the EU space: New conceptual metaphors']. In Hrvatski na putu u EU [‘Croatia on its way to the EU’], ed. by Maja Bratanić, 1–28. Zagreb: Hrvatska sveučilišna naklada.
Takahashi, Hiroshi. 2010. “Central Banking as Fluid Dynamics: A Comparative Study of English and Japanese Metaphors of Money”. Language Research Bulletin 251: 1–18.
van der Valk, Ineke. 2003. “Right-Wing Parliamentary Discourse on Immigration in France”. Discourse and Society 14(3): 309–348.
van Dijk, Teun. 1993. “Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis”. Discourse & Society 4 (2): 249–283.
. 2001. “Critical Discourse Analysis”. In Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by Deborah Tannen et al., 352–371. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wodak, Ruth (ed.). 1989. Language, Power and Ideology. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Vuković-Stamatović, Milica
Ahrens, Kathleen & Winnie Huiheng Zeng
Inya, Onwu
Perović, Slavica & Milica Vuković-Stamatović
Cabrejas-Peñuelas, Ana Belén
2020. The language of recovery. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 33:1 ► pp. 27 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
