Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 8:2 (2017) ► pp.183–207

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Prompting offers of assistance in interaction

 | The University of Queensland
Published online: 10 August 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.8.2.02hau
Abstract
One of the ways in which we can get someone to do something for us is through hinting. However, studies that have attempted to systematically examine requestive hints have faced difficulties in identifying hints as they are designed, by definition, to be ambiguous with respect to the intentions of that speaker. An alternative to this kind of circularity is to shift the analytical lens away from putative speaker intentions as the starting point of analysis. In this paper it is suggested that a properly pragmatic account of prompted offers requires systematic analysis of the situational conditions which afford the participants’ understanding of them as prompted, along with an appreciation of the three-part sequential architecture that is immanent to prompting offer sequences. It is concluded that pragmatic act theory has an important contribution to make to ongoing efforts to better understand fundamental processes of social action formation and ascription.
Article outline
  • 1.Off-record requests and requestive hints
  • 2.Dataset and method
  • 3.Prompting offers of assistance in English
  • 4.Prompted offers and the interactional sensitivity of intentions ascription
  • 5.Pre-emptive versus prompted offers of assistance
  • 6.Prompting offers of assistance as a pragmatic act
  • 7.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (78)
References
Aijmer, Karin. 1996. Conversational Routines in English. Convention and Creativity. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. “Constituting face in conversation: face, facework and interactional achievement.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (8): 2078–2105. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bertuccelli Papi, Marcella. 1999. “Implicitness to whom?” In Pragmatics in 1998. Selected Papers from the 6th International Pragmatics Conference, Vol. 21, edited by Jef Verschueren, 57–72. Antwerp, Belgium: International Pragmatics Association.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana. 1987. “Indirectness and politeness in requests: same or different?” Journal of Pragmatics 111: 131–146. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, and Elite Olshtain. 1984. “Requests and apologies: A cross-cultural study of speech act realization patterns (CCSARP).” Applied Linguistics 5 (3): 196–213. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolden, Galina B., Jenny Mandelbaum, and Sue Wilkinson. 2012. “Pursuing a response by repairing an indexical reference.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (2): 137–155. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson. 1987. Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Capone, Alessandro. 2005. “Pragmemes (a study with reference to English and Italian).” Journal of Pragmatics 37 (9): 1355–1371. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven, and John Heritage. 2014. “Benefactors and beneficiaries: benefactive status and stance in the management of offers and requests.” In Requesting in Social Interaction, edited by Paul Drew and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 51–82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clift, Rebecca. 2001. Meaning in interaction: the case of actually . Language 77 (2): 245–291. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 2014. “What does grammar tell us about action?” Pragmatics 24 (3): 623–647. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Marja Etelämäki. 2015. “Nominated actions and their targeted agents in Finnish conversational directives.” Journal of Pragmatics 781: 7–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, and Michael Haugh. 2014. Pragmatics and the English Language. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Curl, Traci S. 2006. “Offers of assistance: constraints on syntactic design.” Journal of Pragmatics 38 (8): 1257–1280. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Curl, Traci S., and Paul Drew. 2008. Contingency and action: a comparison of two forms of requesting. Research on Language and Social Interaction 41 (2): 129–153. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Downing, Arthur. 2008. “Requesting in Library Reference Service Interactions.” PhD diss., Rutgers State University of New Jersey.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drew, Paul. 1984. “Speakers’ reportings in invitation sequences.” In Structures of Social Action, edited by J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 102–128. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. “Reflections on the micro-politics of social action, in interaction.” Paper presented at the 12th International Pragmatics Association Conference, Manchester.
Drew, Paul, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen. 2014. “Requesting – from speech act to recruitment.” In Requesting in Social Interaction, edited by Paul Drew and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 1–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drew, Paul, Traci Walker, and Richard Ogden. 2013. “Self-repair and action construction.” In Conversational Repair and Human Understanding, edited by Makoto Hayashi, Geoffrey Raymond and Jack Sidnell, 71–94. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Enfield, Nicholas J. 2014. “Human agency and the infrastructure for requests.” In Requesting in Social Interaction, edited by Paul Drew and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 35–53. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, Barbara A. 2007. “Principles shaping grammatical practices: An exploration.” Discourse Studies 9 (3): 299–318. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2015. “On the notion of pre-request.” Discourse Studies 17 (1): 41–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gill, Virginia Teas, Timothy Halkowski, and Felicia Roberts. 2001. “Accomplishing a request without making one: A single case analysis of a primary care visit.” Text & Talk 21 (1/2): 55–81.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie Harness. 2006. “Participation, affect, and trajectory in family directive/response sequences.” Text & Talk 26 (4/5): 513–451.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie Harness, and Asta Cekaite. 2014. “Orchestrating directive trajectories in communicative projects in family interaction.” In Requesting in Social Interaction, edited by Paul Drew and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 185–214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, Paul. 1987 [1989]. “Retrospective epilogue.” In Studies in the Way of Words, edited by Paul Grice, 339–385. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael. 2007. “The co-constitution of politeness implicature in conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 39 (1): 84–110. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. “The place of intention in the interactional achievement of implicature.” In Intention, Common Ground and the Egocentric Speaker-Hearer, edited by Istvan Kecskes and Jacob Mey, 45–85. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Im/politeness Implicatures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael, and Wei-Lin Melody Chang. 2015. “Troubles talk, (dis)affiliation and the participation order in Taiwanese-Chinese online discussion boards.” In Participation in Public and Social Media Interactions, edited by Marta Dynel and Jan Chovanec, 99–133. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 1984. “A change of state token and aspects of its sequential placement.” In Structures of Social Action, edited by Maxwell J. Atkinson and John Heritage, 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. “ Well-prefaced turns in English conversation: A conversation analytic perspective.” Journal of Pragmatics 881: 88–104. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. “The recruitment matrix.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 49 (1): 27–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hofstetter, Emily, and Elizabeth Stokoe. 2015. “Offers of assistance in politician-constituent interaction.” Discourse Studies 17 (6): 724–751. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holdcroft, David. 1976. “Forms of indirect communication: an outline.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 9 (3): 147–161.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacobs, Scott, and Sally Jackson. 1983. “Strategy and structure in conversational influence attempts.” Communication Monographs 50 (4): 285–304. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 1988. “On the sequential organization of troubles talk in ordinary conversation.” Social Problems 35 (4): 418–441. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kádár, Dániel, and Michael Haugh. 2013. Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kärkkäinen, Elise, and Tiina Keisanen. 2012. “Linguistic and embodied formats for making (concrete) offers.” Discourse Studies 14 (5): 587–611. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendrick, Kobin H., and Paul Drew. 2014. “The putative preference for offers over requests.” In Requesting in Social Interaction, edited by Paul Drew and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 87–113. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. “Recruitments: Offers, requests, and the organization of assistance in interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 49 (1): 1–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kidwell, Mardi. 2000. “Common ground in cross-cultural communication: Sequential and institutional contexts in front desk service encounters.” Issues in Applied Linguistics 11 (1): 17–37.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 2014. The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lerner, Gene. 1996. “Finding “face” in the preference structures of talk-in-interaction.” Social Psychology Quarterly 59 (4): 303–321. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lindström, Anna. 2005. “Language as social action. A study of how senior citizens request assistance with practical tasks in the Swedish home help service.” In Syntax and Lexis in Conversation, edited by Auli Hakulinen and Margaret Selting, 209–230. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. “Accepting remote proposals.” In Enabling Human Conduct: Naturalistic Studies of Talk-in-interaction in Honour of Emanuel A. Schegloff, edited by Geoffrey Raymond, Gene H. Lerner and John Heritage. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mey, Jacob L. 2001. Pragmatics. An Introduction. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell. [1993]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010a. “Reference and the pragmeme.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (11): 2882–2888. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010b. “Societal pragmatics.” In The Pragmatics Encyclopedia, edited by Louise Cummings, 444–446. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ogiermann, Eva. 2015a. “Direct off-record requests? – ‘Hinting’ in family interactions.” Journal of Pragmatics 861: 31–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015b. “In/directness in Polish children’s requests at the dinner table.” Journal of Pragmatics 821: 67–82. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita. 1980. “Telling my side: “limited access” as a “fishing” device.” Sociological Inquiry 501: 186–198. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1984. “Pursuing a response.” In Structures of Social Action. Studies in Conversation Analysis, edited by J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 152–163. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita, and John Heritage. 2013. “Preference.” In Handbook of Conversation Analysis, edited by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 210–228. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raymond, Geoffrey. 2003. “Grammar and social organization: yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding.” American Sociological Review 681: 939–967. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rossi, Giovanni. 2014. “When do people not use language to make requests?” In Requesting in Social Interaction, edited by Paul Drew and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 303–334. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1992a. Lectures on Conversation. Volume I1. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1992b. Lectures on Conversation. Volume II1. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sanders, Robert, and Kristine Fitch. 2001. “The actual practice of compliance seeking.” Communication Theory 11 (3): 263–289. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1980. “Preliminaries to preliminaries. ‘Can I ask you a question?’” Sociological Inquiry 50 (3/4): 104–152. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanual A., and Gene Lerner. 2009. Beginning to respond: well-prefaced responses to wh-questions. Research on Language and Social Interaction 42 (2): 91–115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John. 1969. Speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sifianou, Maria. 1993. “Off-record indirectness and the notion of imposition.” Multilingua 12 (1): 69–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. “Politeness and off-record indirectness.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 1261: 163–179. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stevanovic, Melisa, and Anssi Peräkylä. 2012. “Deontic authority in interaction: the right to announce, propose, and decide.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (3): 297–321. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, and Federico Rossano. 2010. “Mobilising response.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 43 (1): 3–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Terkourafi, Marina. 2011. “The puzzle of indirect speech.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (11): 2861–2865. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “Re-assessing the speech act schema: twenty-first century reflections.” International Review of Pragmatics 5(2): 197–216. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walker, Traci. 2013. “Requests.” In Pragmatics of Speech Actions, edited by Marina Sbisà and Ken Turner, 445–466. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weizman, Elda. 1985. “Towards an analysis of opaque utterances: hints as a request strategy.” Theoretical Linguistics 121: 153–163. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1989. “Requestive hints.” In Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies, edited by Shoshana Blum-Kulka, Julianne House and Gabriele Kasper, 71–95. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. “Quantity scales. Towards culture-specific profiles of discourse norms.” In Dialogue and Culture, edited by Marion Grein and Edda Weigand, 141–152. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wong, Jock. 2015. “A critical look at the description of speech acts.” In Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society, edited by Alessandro Capone and Jacob L. Mey, 825–855. New York: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (24)

Cited by 24 other publications

Alshammari, Bandar & Michael Haugh
2025. Mobilizing assistance through troubles-complaints in L2 settings. Applied Linguistics DOI logo
Greer, Tim
2025. Recruitment During Table-Cooked Meals: Foregrounding and Backgrounding Offers and Acts of Assistance Within Multi-Party Talk. East Asian Pragmatics 10:2 ► pp. 162 ff. DOI logo
Fukushima, Saeko
2024. Japanese politeness revisited: from the perspective of attentiveness on Twitter. Journal of Politeness Research 20:2 ► pp. 563 ff. DOI logo
Gubina, Alexandra & Arnulf Deppermann
2024. Rejecting the validity of inferred attributions of incompetence in German talk-in-interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 221 ► pp. 150 ff. DOI logo
Hiramoto, Takeshi
2024. Framing offer-related actions as assistance at jewelry stores in Japan. Discourse Studies 26:4 ► pp. 481 ff. DOI logo
Mandelbaum, Jenny & Gene H. Lerner
2023. On the communicative affordances of instrumental action: Offering meal service to others, whilst serving oneself. Journal of Pragmatics 209 ► pp. 149 ff. DOI logo
Filipović, Luna
2022. Language and Culture as Sources of Inequality in US Police Interrogations. Applied Linguistics 43:6 ► pp. 1073 ff. DOI logo
Põldvere, Nele, Rachele De Felice & Carita Paradis
2022. Advice in Conversation, DOI logo
Arundale, Robert B.
2021. Toward a pragmatics of relating in conversational interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 179 ► pp. 19 ff. DOI logo
Arundale, Robert B.
2022. Temporal Organization and Procedure in Ascribing Action. In Action Ascription in Interaction, ► pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Clift, Rebecca & Michael Haugh
2021. Conversation Analysis and Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 616 ff. DOI logo
Elder, Chi-Hé
2021. Speaker Meaning, Commitment and Accountability. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 48 ff. DOI logo
Elder, Chi-Hé
2024. Pragmatic Inference, DOI logo
Kendrick, Kobin H.
2021. The ‘Other’ side of recruitment: Methods of assistance in social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 178 ► pp. 68 ff. DOI logo
Riou, Marine, Stephen Ball, Austin Whiteside, Sheryl Gallant, Alani Morgan, Paul Bailey & Judith Finn
2020. Caller resistance to perform cardio-pulmonary resuscitation in emergency calls for cardiac arrest. Social Science & Medicine 256 ► pp. 113045 ff. DOI logo
Rudneva, Ekaterina
2019. How Russians pre-request and seek assistance: a study of interaction in two communities of practice. Russian Linguistics 43:2 ► pp. 127 ff. DOI logo
Elder, Chi-Hé & Michael Haugh
2018. The interactional achievement of speaker meaning: Toward a formal account of conversational inference. Intercultural Pragmatics 15:5 ► pp. 593 ff. DOI logo
Elder, Chi-Hé & Michael Haugh
2023. Exposing and avoiding unwanted inferences in conversational interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 218 ► pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Stevanovic, Melisa
2018. Social deontics: A nano‐level approach to human power play. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 48:3 ► pp. 369 ff. DOI logo
Haugh, Michael
2017. Chapter 13. Implicature and the inferential substrate. In Implicitness [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 276], ► pp. 281 ff. DOI logo
Haugh, Michael
2022. Action Ascription, Accountability and Inference. In Action Ascription in Interaction, ► pp. 81 ff. DOI logo
Haugh, Michael
2024. Ostensible offers, politeness and sincere hypocrisy. In The Pragmatics of Hypocrisy [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 343], ► pp. 162 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Approaches and Methods in Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 567 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Fundamentals of Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 13 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue