Article published In: (Co-)Constructing Interpersonally Sensitive Activities Across Institutional Settings
Edited by Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen and Rosina Márquez Reiter
[Pragmatics and Society 7:4] 2016
► pp. 664–692
Patterns of thanking in the closing section of UK service calls
Marking conversational macro-structure vs managing interpersonal relations
Published online: 20 December 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.7.4.07mos
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.7.4.07mos
I investigate patterns of usage of thanking formulae in the closing section of a corpus of 94 telephone calls made by tenants to a UK housing association. The data suggest that unilateral thanking is the norm when calls are institutionally and interactionally unmarked. In contrast, mutual thanking correlates mainly with the presence of interactional problems of various kinds, or, in a few cases, with features that are not problematic as such, but simply interactionally marked given the nature of the activity.
When initiated by agents rather than by callers, thanking is frequently hearable as conveying an apologetic stance. Participants thus seem to orient to different thanking patterns as devices which may be used either to mark the preceding interaction as an instance of ‘business-as-usual’ or, if such is not the case, to restore interpersonal harmony or index awareness that aspects of the preceding interaction have otherwise deviated from situational expectations.
References (29)
Aijmer, Karin. 1996. Conversational Routines in English. Convention and Creativity. London: Longman.
Antaki, Charles. 2002. “‘Lovely’: Turn-initial High-grade Assessments in Telephone Closings.” Discourse Studies 4 (1): 5–23.
Aston, Guy. 1995. “‘Say ‘”Thank You”’: Some Pragmatic Constraints on Conversational Closings.” Applied Linguistics 16 (1): 57–86.
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness. Some Universals of Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Button, Graham. 1987. “Moving out of Closings.” In Talk and Social Organisation, ed. by Gene Button and John R.E. Lee, 101–151. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Coulmas, Florian. 1981. “‘Poison to Your Soul’. Thanks and Apologies Contrastively Viewed.” In Conversational Routine. Explorations in Standardized Communication Situations and Prepatterned Speech, ed. by Florian Coulmas, 69–91. The Hague: Mouton.
Emerson, Robert M., and Sheldon L. Messinger. 1977. “The Micro-politics of Trouble.” Social Problems 25 (2): 121–134.
Erman, Britt, and Ulla-Britt Kotsinas. 1993. “Pragmaticalization: The case of ba’ and you know
.” Studier i modern språkvetenskap 101: 76–93.
Goffman, Erving. 1967. “On Face-Work. An Analysis of Ritual Elements in Social Interaction.” In Interaction Ritual: Essays in Face-to-Face Behavior, 5–45. Chicago: Aldine.
Heritage, John, and Steven Clayman. 2010. Talk in Action. Interactions, Identities, and Institutions. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Heritage, John, and Sue Sefi. 1992. “Dilemmas of Advice: Aspects of the Delivery and Reception of Advice in Interactions between Health Visitors and First-Time Mothers.” In Talk at Work. Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed. by Paul Drew and John Heritage, 359–417. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hymes, Dell. 1971. “Sociolinguistics and the Ethnography of Speaking.” In Social Anthropology and Language, ed. by Edwin Ardener, 47–93. London: Tavistock.
Jautz, Sabine. 2013. Thanking Formulae in English. Explorations Across Varieties and Genres. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lerner, Gene, H. 2004. “Collaborative Turn Sequences.” In Conversation Analysis. Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner, 225–256. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lindström, Anna, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen. 2013. “Affiliation in Conversation.” In Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 350–369. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Murphy, James. 2015. “Revisiting the Apology as a Speech Act. The Case of Parliamentary Apologies.” Journal of Language and Politics 14 (2): 175–204.
Okamoto, Shinichiro, and W. Peter Robinson. 1997. “Determinants of Gratitude Expressions in England.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 16 (4): 411–433.
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language 50 (4): 696–735.
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction. A Primer in Conversation Analysis, vol. 11. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, Emanuel A., and Harvey Sacks. 1974. “Opening up Closings.” In Ethnomethodology: Selected Readings, ed. by Roy Turner, 233–263. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Cited by (10)
Cited by ten other publications
Huang, Limin & Dengshan Xia
Orthaber, Sara
Orthaber, Sara
Orthaber, Sara
Orthaber, Sara
Orthaber, Sara
Boginskaya, Olga
Koole, Tom & Lotte van Burgsteden
Grahn, Inga-Lill
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
