Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 6:4 (2015) ► pp.593–614

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Building rapport through sequentially linked joke-serious responses in Second Language job interviews

Published online: 21 December 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.6.4.06oka
This study aims to explicate interviewer and candidate conversational practices in L2 job interviews as they relate to the assessment of a candidate’s qualification for a particular position. The data consisted of 27 audio-recorded job interviews for the position of student assistant in English classes at a Japanese university. The analysis of these interactional data, conducted using conversational analysis methodology, revealed that the inadequacy of a candidate’s response is constructed by means of the interviewer’s subsequent pursuit of a relevant answer from the candidate. In addition, a candidate’s ability to build rapport by providing sequentially linked joke-serious responses evoked a positive evaluation from the interviewer. The findings indicate that a candidate’s understanding of expected behaviors and ability to accommodate his or her behaviors in a manner relevant to the interaction result in a positive assessment.
References (46)
Bilmes, Jack. 1985. “‘Why That Now?’ Two Kinds of Conversational Meaning.” Discourse processes8 (3): 319–355. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Annie. 2003. “Interviewer Variation and the Co-Construction of Speaking Proficiency.” Language Testing20 (1): 1–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brutton, Graham. 1992. “Answers as Interactional Products: Two Sequential Practices Used in Job Interviews.” In Talk at Work: Interaction and Institutional Settings, ed. by Paul Drew and John Heritage, 212–231. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drew, Paul. 1997. “‘Open’ Class Repair Initiators in Response to Sequential Sources of Troubles in Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics28 (1): 69101. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glenn, Philipp. 2010. “Interviewer Laughs: Shared Laughter and Asymmetries in Employment Interviews.” Journal of Pragmatics42 (6): 1485–1498. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “Interviewees’ Volunteered Laughter in Employment Interviews: A Case of Nervous Laughter?”InStudies of Laughter in Interaction, ed. byPhilipp Glenn and 
Elizabeth Holt, 255–275. London: Bloomsbury Academic. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greer, Tim, Vivian Bussinguer, Jeff Butterfield, and Agnes Mischinger. 2009. “Receipt through Repetition.” JALT Journal 31 (1): 5–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John, and Steven Clayman. 2010. Talk in Action: Interactions, Identities, and Institutions. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hosoda, Megumi, and Eugene Stone-Romero. 2010.“The Effects of Foreign Accents on Employment-Related Decisions.” Journal of Managerial Psychology25 (2): 113–132. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hosoda, Megumi, Lam T. Nguyen, and Eugene Stone-Romero. 2012. “The Effect of Hispanic Accents on Employment Decisions.” Journal of Managerial Psychology27 (4): 347–364. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Houtkoop-Steenstra, Hanneke. 2000. Interaction and the Standardized Survey Interview. 
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hutchby, Ian, and Robin Wooffitt. 2008. Conversation Analysis: Principles, Practices and Implications. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 1984. “On the Organization of Laughter in Talk about Troubles.”InStructures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. byJohn Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 346–369. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kasper, Gabriele, and Steven J. Ross. 2003. “Repetition as a Source of Miscommunication in Oral Proficiency Interviews.”InMisunderstanding in Social Life, ed. byJuliane House, 
Gabriele Kasper, and Steven Ross, 82–106. London: Longman/Pearson Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. “Multiple Questions in Oral Proficiency Interviews.” Journal of Pragmatics39 (11): 2045–2070. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kassim, Hafizoah, and Fatimah Ali. 2010. “English Communicative Events and Skills Needed at the Workplace: Feedback from the Industry.” English for Specific Purposes29 (3): 168–182. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kerekes, Julia A. 2006.“Winning an Interviewer’s Trust in a Gatekeeping Encounter.” Language in Society35 (1): 27–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. “The Co-Construction of a Gatekeeping Encounter: An Inventory of Verbal Actions.” Journal of Pragmatics39 (11): 1942–1973. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levashina, Julia, Christopher J. Hartwell, Frederick P. Morgeson, and Michael A Campion. 2014. “The Structured Employment Interview: Narrative and Quantitative Review of the Research Literature.” Personnel Psychology67 (1): 241–293. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Llewellyn, Nick. 2010. “On the Reflexivity between Setting and Practice: The ‘Recruitment Interview’.”InOrganisation, Interaction and Practice: Studies of Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis, ed. byNick Llewellyn and Jon Hindmarsh, 74–95. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Llewellyn, Nick, and Laura Spence. 2009. “Practice as a Members’ Phenomenon.” Organization Studies30 (12) 1419–1439. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Markee, Numa, and Gabriele Kasper. 2004. “Classroom Talks: An Introduction.” The Modern Language Journal88 (4): 491–500. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maynard, Douglas W., and Nora C. Schaeffer. 2006. “Standardization-in-Interaction: The Survey Interview.”InTalk and Interaction in Social Research Methods, ed. byPaul Drew, Geoff Raymond, and Darin Weinberg, 9–27. London: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maynard, Douglas W., Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra, Nora Cate Schaeffer, Johannes van der Zouwen (eds). 2002. Standardization and Tacit Knowledge: Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McNamara, Tim, and Carsten Roever. 2006. Language Testing: The Social Dimension. Malden, Mass: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Okada, Yusuke. 2010. “Role-Play in Oral Proficiency Interviews: Interactive Footing and Interactional Competencies.” Journal of Pragmatics42 (6): 1647–1668. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “Prioritization: A Formulation Practice and its Relevance for Interaction in Teaching and Testing Contexts.”InPragmatics and Language LearningVol. 131, ed. byTim Greer, Donna Tatsuki, and Carsten Roever, 55–77. Honolulu, Hawai’i: National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Okada, Yusuke, and Tim Greer. 2013. “Pursuing a Relevant Response in OPI Role-Plays.”InAssessing Second Language Pragmatics, ed. bySteven J. Ross and Gabriele Kasper, 294–316. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pike, Kenneth L. 1967. Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of the Structures of Human Behavior. 2nd ed. The Hague: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Potter, Jonathan, and Alexa Hepburn. 2005. “Qualitative Interviews in Psychology: Problems and Possibilities.” Qualitative Research in Psychology2 (4): 281–307. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. “Putting Aspiration Into Words: ‘Laugh Particles’, Managing Descriptive Trouble and Modulating Action.” Journal of Pragmatics42 (6): 1543–1555. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raymond, Geoffrey. 2004. “Prompting Action: The Stand-Alone ‘so’ in Ordinary Conversation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction37 (2): 185-218. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ross, Steven J. 2007. “Comparative Task-in-Interaction Analysis of OPI Backsliding.” Journal of Pragmatics39 (11): 2017–2044. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on Conversation, Vol. I & II1. Ed. byGail Jefferson. Oxford: 
Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, and Emanuel A. Schegloff. 1979. “Two Preferences in the Organization of Reference to Persons in Conversation and Their Interaction.” InEveryday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. byGeorge Psathas, 15–21. New York: Irvington Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language50 (4): 696–735. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel. A. 1982. “Discourse as an Interactional Achievement: Some Uses of ‘uh huh’ and Other Things that Come Between Sentences.”InAnalyzing Discourse: Text and Talk, ed. byDeborah Tannen, 71–93. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1987. “Some Sources of Misunderstanding in Talk-in-Interaction.” Linguistics25 (1): 201–218. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1999. “’Schegloff’s Texts’ as ‘Billig’s Data’: A Critical Reply.” Discourse & Society10 (4): 558–572. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seedhouse, Paul. 2005. “Conversation Analysis as a Research Methodology.”InApplying Conversation Analysis, ed. byKeith Richards and Paul Seedhouse, 251–266. Basingstoke: Palgrave-­Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “Oral proficiency Interviews as Varieties of Interaction.”InAssessing Second Language Pragmatics, ed. bySteven J. Ross and Gabriele Kasper, 199–219. 
Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shaw, Chlouë, Alexa Hepburn, and Jonathan Potter. 2013. “Having the Last Laugh: On Post Completion Laughter Particles.”InStudies of Laughter in Interaction, ed. byPhilipp Glenn and Elizabeth Holt, 91–106. London: Bloomsbury Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
ten Have, Paul. 2007. Doing Conversation Analysis. 2nd ed. London: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, Haidan. 2011. “Chinese for Business Professionals: The Workplace Needs and Business Chinese Textbooks.” Global Business Languages16 (1): 27–42.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Peña-Acuña, Beatriz
2023. Trending Topics about Performance in Second Language Learning . East European Journal of Psycholinguistics DOI logo
Sheikhan, Amir & Michael Haugh
2023. Epistemics and conversational humour in intercultural first conversations. In The Pragmatics of Humour in Interactive Contexts [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 335], ► pp. 110 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Don C.
2022. Horse-Sized Ducks or Duck-Sized Horses? Oddball Personality Questions Are Likable (but Useless) for Organizational Recruitment. Journal of Business and Psychology 37:1 ► pp. 215 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue