Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 6:4 (2015) ► pp.502516

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (18)
Azuelos-Atias, Sol. 2009. “The Rationality of Legal Argumentation”. Pragmatics and Cognition17 (2): 383–401. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. “Semantically Cued Unspoken Assumptions in the Legal Text”. Journal of Pragmatics421: 728–743. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. “On the Incoherence of the Legal Language to the General Public”. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law241: 41–59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burke, Kenneth. 1969. A Rhetoric of Motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Copi, Irving. 1973. Symbolic Logic. New York: Macmillan Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenfield, Aryeh. 2001. Penal Law 5737–1977. Verbatim English translation incorporating all amendments up to and including amendment No. 63. Israel: A.G. Publication.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 2000. Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1948. Human Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson.1986. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. 
Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A. 1993. “Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis”. Discourse and Society4 (2): 249–283. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. “Discourse, Ideology and Context”. Folia Linguistica30 (1–2): 11–40.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. “From Text Grammar to Critical Discourse Analysis: A Brief Academic Autobiography”. Available at: [URL]
. 2006. “Discourse and Manipulation”. Discourse and Society17 (2): 359–383. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: 
Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “Knowledge, Discourse and Domination”. InPragmaticizing Understanding: Studies for Jef Verschueren, ed. byMichael Meeuwis and Jan-Ola Östman, 151–196. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 1996. Disorders of Discourse. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber . 2004. “Relevance Theory”. InHandbook of Pragmatics, ed. byLarry Horn and Greg Ward, 607–632. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Azuelos-Atias, Sol & Ning Ye
2017. On drafting, interpreting, and translating legal texts across languages and cultures . International Journal of Legal Discourse 2:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Azuelos-Atias, Sol
2016. Identifying the meanings hidden in legal texts: The three conditions of relevance theory and their sufficiency. Semiotica 2016:209  pp. 99 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue