Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 6:1 (2015) ► pp.117–145

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

‘It is a truth universally acknowledged’…, you know?

The role of adaptive management and prosody to start a turn in conversation

Published online: 10 March 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.6.1.06rom
This article describes the prosodic features of the most frequent pragmatic markers in English conversations that contribute to the management of context in interaction. Often, turn-taking has been analyzed either from a structural perspective, in which the participants are treated as subjects that pursue rules, accommodating to pre-established patterns, or (more recently) from a pragmatic perspective with a focus on the intentionality of the speaker in the use of pragmatic markers. It is my contention in this article that pragmatic markers are ancillary to context within the Dynamic Model of Meaning theory, and that prosody plays an essential role in adaptive management as the fourth element of context.
References (62)
Aijmer, Karin. 2013. Understanding Pragmatic Markers: A Variational Pragmatic Approach. 
Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aijmer, Karin, and Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen (eds). 2006. Pragmatic Markers in Contrast. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Balog, Heather. 2012. “Early Prosodic Production: Pragmatic and Acoustic Analyses for L2 Language Learners.” In Pragmatics and Prosody in English Language Teaching, ed. by J. Romero-Trillo, 133–147. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blakemore, Diane. 2002. Relevance and Linguistic Meaning: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1958. “A theory of pitch accent in English.” Word 141: 109–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brazil, David. 1975. Discourse Intonation 1/2. Birmingham: Birmingham University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. 1996. Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Gillian, and George Yule. 1983. Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buysse, Lieven. 2012. “ So as a Multifunctional Discourse Marker in Native and Learner Speech.” Journal of Pragmatics 441: 1764–1782. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cuenca, Maria J. (ed.). 2007. “Contrastive Perspectives on Discourse Markers.” Catalan Journal of Linguistics 6 (special issue): 1–172.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cruttenden, Alan. 1997. Intonation (2nd Edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dascal, Marcelo. 1999. “Introduction: Some Questions about Misunderstanding.” Journal of Pragmatics 311: 753–762. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Klerk, Vivian. 2010. Corpus Linguistics and World Englishes. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles. 1997. Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin (ed.). 2006. Approaches to Discourse Particles. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giora, Rachel 2003. On Our Mind: Salience, Context, and Figurative Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gladkova, Anna, and Jesús Romero-Trillo. 2014. “Ain’t it Beautiful? The Conceptualization of Beauty from an Ethnopragmatic Perspective.” Journal of Pragmatics.
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
Gussenhoven, Carlos. 1984. On the Grammar and Semantics of Sentence Accents. Dordrecht: Foris Publications. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. 1967. Intonation and Grammar in British English. The Hague: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1970. A Course in Spoken English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 2013. “Turn-initial Position and Some of its Occupants.” Journal of Pragmatics 571: 331–337. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul, and Elizabeth C. Traugott. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Innes, Bronwen. 2010. “‘Well, that’s why I asked this question sir’: Well as a discourse marker in court.” Language in Society 391: 95–117. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jenkins, Jennifer. 2004. “Research in Teaching Pronunciation and Intonation.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 241: 109–125. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kecskes, Istvan. 2003. Situation-Bound Utterances in L1 and L2. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. “Lexical Merging, Conceptual Blending and Cultural Crossing.” Intercultural Pragmatics 1(1): 1–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. “On my Mind: Thoughts about Salience, Context and Figurative Language from a Second Language Perspective.” Second Language Research 22 (2): 219–237. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. “Dueling Contexts: A Dynamic Model of Meaning.” Journal of Pragmatics 401: 385–406. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kecskes, Istvan, and Fenghui Zhang. 2009. “Activating, seeking, and creating common ground: A socio‐cognitive approach.” Pragmatics and Cognition 171: 331–355. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, Hye Ri Stephanie, and Satomi Kuroshima. 2013. “Turn Beginnings in Interaction: An Introduction.” Journal of Pragmatics 571: 267–273. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Knott, Alistair, and Robert Dale. 1994. “Using Linguistic Phenomena to Motivate a set of Coherence Relations.” Discourse Processes 181: 35–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert. 1996. Intonational Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maguire, Laura, and Jesús Romero-Trillo. 2013. “Context Dynamism in Classroom Discourse.” In Research Trends in Intercultural Pragmatics, ed. by I. Kecskes & J. Romero-Trillo, 145–160. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mascaro, Olivier, and Dan Sperber. 2009. “The Moral, Epistemic, and Mindreading Components of Children’s Vigilance Towards Deception.” Cognition 1121: 367–380. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mey, Jacob L. 2001. Pragmatics: An Introduction (2nd edn.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norrick, Neal R. (ed.). 2009. “Pragmatic Markers.” Journal of Pragmatics 41 (special issue).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor. 1996. “Linguistic Resources for Socializing Humanity.” In Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, ed. by J.J. Gumperz and S.C. Levinson, 407–437. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Östman, Jan-Ola. 1995. “Pragmatic Particles 20 years after.” In Organization in Discourse, ed. by B. Wårvik, S.K. Tanskanen, and R. Hiltunen, 95–108. Turku: University of Turku.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Padilla Cruz, Manuel. 2013. “Metapsychological Awareness of Comprehension and Epistemic Vigilance of L2 Communication in Interlanguage Pragmatic Development.” Journal of Pragmatics 591: 117–135. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pickering, Lucy, Guiling Hu, and Amanda Baker. 2012. “The Pragmatic Function of Intonation: Cueing Agreement and Disagreement in Spoken English Discourse and Implications for ELT.” In Pragmatics and Prosody in English Language Teaching, ed. by J. Romero-Trillo, 199–218. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Romero-Trillo, Jesús. 1994. “Ahm, ehm...You call it Theme? A Thematic Approach to Spoken English.” Journal of Pragmatics 221: 495–509. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. “Your Attention Please. Pragmatic Mechanisms to Obtain the Addressee’s Attention in English and Spanish Conversations.” Journal of Pragmatics 281: 205–221. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. “A Mathematical Model for the Analysis of Variation in Discourse.” Journal of Linguistics 371: 527–550. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002a. “The Pragmatic Fossilization of Discourse Markers in Non-native Speakers of English.” Journal of Pragmatics 341: 769–784. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002b. “The Sympathetic Circularity Function in English: An Intonation Corpus-driven Analysis.” Revista Complutense de Estudios Ingleses 101: 87–112Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. “Discourse Markers.” In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, ed. by K. Brown, 639–641. Oxford: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007. “Adaptive Management in Discourse: The Case of Involvement Discourse Markers in English and Spanish.” Catalan Journal of Linguistics 61: 81–94. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(ed.). 2008. Pragmatics and Corpus Linguistics, a Mutualistic Entente. 
Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “Pragmatic Markers.” In Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ed. by C. Chapelle, 4522–4528. Oxford: Blackwell-Wiley. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(ed.). 2013. The Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, vol. 1: New Domains and Methodologies. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Romero Trillo, Jesús. 2014. “‘Pragmatic Punting’ and Prosody: Evidence from Corpora.” In The Functional Perspective on Language and Discourse: Applications and Implications, ed. by M.A. Gómez González, et al., 293–309. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Romero-Trillo, Jesús, and Elizabeth Lenn. 2011. “Do you (mis)understand What I Mean?” Journal of English Studies 91: 209–221.. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Romero-Trillo, Jesús, and Laura Maguire. 2011. “Adaptive Context: The Fourth Element of Meaning.” International Review of Pragmatics 31: 228–241. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Romero-Trillo, Jesús, and Jessica Newell. 2012. “Prosody and Feedback in Native and Non-native Speakers of English.” In Pragmatics and Prosody in English Language Teaching, ed. by J. Romero-Trillo, 117–131. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-taking for Conversation.” Language 501: 696–735. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1983. Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, Fabrice Clément, Christophe Heintz, Olivier Mascaro, Hugo Mercier, Gloria Origgi, and Deirdre Wilson. 2010. “Epistemic Vigilance.” Mind and Language 251: 359–393. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Svartvik, Jan, and Randolph Quirk. 1980. A Corpus of English Conversation. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szczepek-Reed, Beatrice. 2012. “Prosody in Conversation: Implications for Teaching English Pronunciation.” In Pragmatics and Prosody in English Language Teaching, ed. by J. Romero-Trillo, 147–168. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Shan, Yi
2021. Investigating the Interaction Between Prosody and Pragmatics Quantitatively: A Case Study of the Chinese Discourse Marker ni zhidao (“You Know”). Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo
Shan, Yi
2023. Form (Prosody)-Meaning (Pragmatics) pairings of discourse markers: A case study of Nǐ zhīdào (‘You Know’) as a construction in Chinese media interviews. Language & Communication 93 ► pp. 136 ff. DOI logo
Shan, Yi
2025. Prosodic modulation of discourse markers: A cross-linguistic analysis of conversational dynamics. Speech Communication 173 ► pp. 103271 ff. DOI logo
De Marco, Anna
2016. The use of discourse markers in L2 Italian. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 7:1 ► pp. 67 ff. DOI logo
MacArthur, Fiona
2016. Beyond Engaged Listenership: Assessing Spanish Undergraduates’ Active Participation in Academic Mentoring Sessions in English as Academic Lingua Franca. In Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2016 [Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, ], ► pp. 153 ff. DOI logo
Gonen, Einat, Zohar Livnat & Noam Amir
2015. The discourse marker axshav (‘now’) in spontaneous spoken Hebrew: Discursive and prosodic features. Journal of Pragmatics 89 ► pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Romero-Trillo, Jesús
2015. Understanding vagueness: A prosodic analysis of endocentric and exocentric general extenders in English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 86 ► pp. 54 ff. DOI logo
Romero-Trillo, Jesús
2018. Prosodic modeling and position analysis of pragmatic markers in English conversation. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 14:1 ► pp. 169 ff. DOI logo
Romero-Trillo, Jesús
2018. Corpus Pragmatics and Second Language Pragmatics: A Mutualistic Entente in Theory and Practice. Corpus Pragmatics 2:2 ► pp. 113 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue