Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 6:1 (2015) ► pp.6788

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (40)
Antaki, Charles. 2008. “Formulations in Psychotherapy.” In Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä, Charles Antaki, Sanna Vehviläinen, and Ivan Leudar, 26–42. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Antaki, Charles, Rebecca Barnes, and Ivan Leudar. 2005. “Diagnostic Formulations in Psychotherapy.” Discourse Studies 7 (6): 627–647. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Atkinson, J. Maxwell, and John Heritage. 1984. “Transcript Notation.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, ix–xvi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kevoe-Feldman, Heidi, and Jeffrey D. Robinson. 2012. “Exploring Essentially Three-turn Courses of Action: An Institutional Case Study with Implications for Ordinary Talk.” Discourse Studies 14 (3): 217–241. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kevoe-Feldman, Heidi, Jeffrey D. Robinson, and Jenny Mandelbaum. 2011. “Extending the Notion of Pragmatic Completion: The Case of the Compound Action Unit.” Journal of Pragmatics 431: 3844–3859. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolden, Galina. 2010. “‘Articulating the Unsaid’ via And-prefaced Formulations of Other’s Talk.” Discourse Studies 12 (1): 5–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drew, Paul, and John Heritage. 1992. “Analyzing Talk at Work: An Introduction.” In Talk at Work, ed. by Paul Drew and John Heritage, 3–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drew, Paul. 2003. “Precision and Exaggeration in Interaction.” American Sociological Review 681: 917–938. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E., and Sandra A. Thompson. 1996. “lnteractional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns.” In Interaction and Grammar, ed. by Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, 134–184. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fitzsimmons, James A., and Mona J. Fitzsimmons. 1998. Service Management: Operations, Strategy, and Information Technology (2nd edition). Boston, Mass.: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gutek, Barbara. 1995. The Dynamics of Service: Reflections on the Changing Nature of Customer/Provider Interactions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 1984. “A Change of State Token and Aspects of its Sequential Placement.” In Structures of Social Action, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 299–345. 
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1985. “Analyzing News Interviews: Aspects of the Production of Talk for an Overhearing Audience. In Handbook of Discourse Analysis Vol. 31, ed. by Teun A. van Dijk, 95–119. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John, and Tanya Stivers. 1999. “Online Commentary in Acute Medical Visits: A Method of Shaping Patient Expectations.” Social Science and Medicine 49 (11): 1501–1517. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John, and Rod D. Watson. 1979. “Formulations as Conversational Objects.” In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by George Psathas, 123–162. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hutchby, Ian. 2005. “Active Listening: Formulations and the Elicitation of Feelings-talk in Child Counseling.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 38 (3): 303–329. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hochschild, Arlie Russell. 1983. The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 2004. “A Sketch of Some Orderly Aspects of Overlap in Natural Conversation.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner, 43–59. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William, and David Fanshel. 1977. Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lam, Phoenix. 2010. “Toward a Functional Framework for Discourse Particles: A Comparison of ‘Well’ and ‘So’.” Text & Talk 30 (6): 657–677. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lerner, Gene. 2004. “On the Place of Linguistic Resources in the Organization of Talk-in-Interaction: Grammar as Action in Prompting a Speaker to Elaborate.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 37 (2): 151–184. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen. 1992. “Activity Type and Language.” In Talk at Work, ed. by Paul Drew and John Heritage, 66–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maynard, Douglas W. 1992. “On clinicians co-implicating recipients’ perspective in the delivery of diagnostic news.” In Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings, ed. by Paul Drew and John Heritage, 331–358. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nielsen, Mie Femø, Søren Beck Nielsen, Gitte Gravengaard, and Brian Due. 2012. “Interactional Functions of Invoking Procedure in Institutional Settings.” Journal of Pragmatics 441: 1457–1473. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Normann, Richard. 1984. Service Management: Strategy and Leadership in Service Business (2nd ed.). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peräkylä, Anssi. 2011. “After Interpretation: Third-position Utterances in Psychoanalysis.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 44 (3): 288–316.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita. 1986. “Extreme case Formulations: A Way of Legitimizing Claims.” Human Studies 91: 219–229. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raymond, Geoffrey. 2003. “Grammar and Social Organization: Yes/No Interrogatives and the Structures of Responding.” American Sociological Review 68 (6): 939–967. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. “Prompting Action: The Stand-alone ‘So’ in Sequences of Talk-in-Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 73 (2): 185–218. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robinson, Jeffrey D., and John Heritage. 2005. “The Structure of Patients’ Presenting Concerns: The Completion Relevance of Current Symptoms.” Social Science & Medicine 611: 481–493. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1988. “Goffman and the Analysis of Conversation.” In Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order, ed. by Paul Drew and Anthony J. Wootton, 89–135. 
Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996. “Turn Organization: One Intersection of Grammar and Interaction.” In Interaction and Grammar, ed. by Elinor Ochs, Sandra Thompson and Emanuel A. Schegloff, 52–133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. “On Complainability”. Social Problems 52 (3): 449–476. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers: Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics. 
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steensig, Jakob, and Tine Larsen. 2008. “Affilliative and Disaffillative Uses of You Say x Questions.” Discourse Studies 10 (1): 113–132. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya. 2005. “Non-antibiotic Treatment Recommendations: Delivery Formats and Implications for Parent Resistance.” Social Science & Medicine 601: 949–946. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Don. 1992. “The interactional organization of calls c::/ for emergency assistance.” In Talk at Work, ed. by Paul Drew and John Heritage, 418–469. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. “How closing matters in emergency calls.” Paper presented at the 
Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association , Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Cited by (12)

Cited by 12 other publications

Feng, Debing
2025. “Thank you for your participation”. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) DOI logo
Orthaber, Sara
2023. Routine Calls for Information and Request Emails. In (Im)politeness at a Slovenian Call Centre [Advances in (Im)politeness Studies, ],  pp. 97 ff. DOI logo
Boginskaya, Olga
2022. Popularizing in legal discourse: What efforts do Russian judges make to facilitate juror’s comprehension of law-related contents?. Discourse Studies 24:5  pp. 527 ff. DOI logo
Herijgers, Marloes & Tessa van Charldorp
2021. Communicating information packages in institutional face-to-face consultations. Discourse Studies 23:1  pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Chen, Jessie & Scott Barnes
2020. Giving information in cosmetics sales interactions: Exploring some interactional functions of the Mandarin response token dui. Journal of Pragmatics 159  pp. 12 ff. DOI logo
Kent, Alexandra & Charles Antaki
2020. Police Call-takers' First Substantive Question Projects the Outcome of the Call. Applied Linguistics 41:5  pp. 640 ff. DOI logo
Márquez Reiter, Rosina
2019. Navigating commercial constraints in a service call. In Technology Mediated Service Encounters [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 300],  pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
Sikveland, Rein Ove & Elizabeth Stokoe
2017. Enquiry calls to GP surgeries in the United Kingdom: Expressions of incomplete service and dissatisfaction in closing sequences. Discourse Studies 19:4  pp. 441 ff. DOI logo
Orthaber, Sara & Rosina Márquez Reiter
2016. When routine calls for information become interpersonally sensitive. Pragmatics and Society 7:4  pp. 638 ff. DOI logo
Kevoe-Feldman, Heidi
2015. What Can You Do for Me? Communication Methods Customers Use to Solicit Personalization within the Service Encounter. Communication Monographs 82:4  pp. 510 ff. DOI logo
Kevoe-Feldman, Heidi
2015. Working the overall structural organization of a call: How customers use third position as leverage for gaining service representatives' assistance in dealing with service problems. Language & Communication 43  pp. 47 ff. DOI logo
Kevoe-Feldman, Heidi
2018. The interactional work of suppressing complaints in customer service encounters. Journal of Pragmatics 123  pp. 102 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue