Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 6:1 (2015) ► pp.1–21

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Adding insult to inquiry

Published online: 10 March 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.6.1.01wee
While compliments are usually intended to give credit and insults offense, the latter cannot simply be treated as opposites of the former. For example, a speaker can give credit to others as well as himself/herself. But while a speaker can offend others, it is less clear that a speaker can offend himself/herself. Understanding why this should be so provides us with a key insight into the nature of insults, namely, that it is predicated on the presumption that some dissimilarity exists between the speaker and the target of the insult. Various interesting implications follow from this insight, allowing us to (i) understand why competitive ritualized exchanges of insults are more commonly attested than are analogous competitions involving compliments; (ii) better appreciate the ideological bases of politically correct speech; and (iii) adjudicate on the relative merits of various theories of politeness, in particular, on claims concerning the relationship between politeness and face.
References (42)
Allen, Irving Lewis. 1983. The Language of Ethnic Conflict. New York: Columbia University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Billig, Michael. 2001. “Humor and Hatred: The Racist Jokes of the Ku Klux Klan.” Discourse and Society 121: 291–313. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brenneis, Donald. 1978. “Fighting Words.” New Scientist, 4 May 1987.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bousfield, Derek. 2008. Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Claude. 1972. “The Language of Soul.” In Rappin’ and Stylin’ Out, ed. by Thomas 
Kochman, 134–139. Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Stephen Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Byrne, Donn. 1971. The Attraction Paradigm. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah. 1995. Verbal Hygiene. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, Rong. 2001. Self-politeness: A Proposal. Journal of Pragmatics 331: 87–106. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. 1996. “Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness.” Journal of Pragmatics 251: 349–367. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. “Conventionalized Impoliteness Formulae.” Journal of Pragmatics 421: 3232–3245. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. (Im)politeness: Three Issues. Journal of Pragmatics 441: 1128–1133. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, Derek Bousfield, and Anne Wichmann. 2003. “Impoliteness Revisited: With Special Reference to Dynamic and Prosodic Aspects.” Journal of Pragmatics 351: 1545–1579. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dundes, Alan, Jerry W. Leach, and Bora Özkök. 1970. “The Strategy of Turkish Boys’ Verbal Dueling Rhymes.” Journal of American Folklore 831: 325– 349. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellison, Ralph. 1952. Invisible Man. New York: Random House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foley, William. 1997. Anthropological Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1955. “On Face Work: An Analysis of Ritual Elements in Social Interaction.” Psychiatry 181: 213–231. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1967. Interaction Ritual. Chicago: Aldine Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1971. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenberg, Jeff, S.L. Kirkland, and Tom Pyszczynski. 1988. “Some Theoretical Notions and Preliminary Research Concerning Derogatory Ethnic Labels.” In Discourse and Discrimination, ed. by Geneva Smitherman-Donaldson and Teun A. van Dijk, 74–92. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gu, Yueguo. 1990. “Politeness Phenomena in Modern Chinese.” Journal of Pragmatics 141: 237–257. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hill, Jane H. 2008. The Everyday Language of White Racism. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet. 1986. “Compliments and Compliment Responses in New Zealand English.” Anthropological Linguistics 28(4): 485–508.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. Women, Men and Politeness. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holt, Grace Sims. 1972. “’Inversion’ in Black Communication.” In Rappin’ and Stylin’ Out, ed. by Thomas Kochman, 152–159. Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, Ken. 1972. “The Vocabulary of Race.” In Rappin’ and Stylin’ Out, ed. by Thomas 
Kochman, 140–151. Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kissling, Elizabeth Arveda. 1991. “Street Harassment: The Language of Sexual Terrorism.” Discourse and Society 2(4): 451–460. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kissling, Elizabeth Arveda, and Cheris Kramarae. 1991. “’Stranger Compliments’: The Interpretation of Street Remarks.” Women’s Studies in Communication (Spring): 77–95.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kochman, Thomas. 1983. “The Boundary between Play and Nonplay in Black Verbal Dueling.” Language and Society 12(3): 329–337. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Language in the Inner City. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lachenicht, Lance G. 1980. “Aggravating Language. A Study of Abusive and Insulting Language.” International Journal of Human Communication 13 (4): 607–687.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. Politeness: Is there an East-West Divide? Journal of Politeness Research 3(2): 167–206.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Yoshiko. 1988. “Reexamination of the Universality of Face: Politeness Phenomena in Japanese.” Journal of Pragmatics 111: 721–736.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mey, Jacob L. 1993. Pragmatics: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Pragmatics: An Introduction (Sec’d ed.). Oxford & Malden, Mass.: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rokeach, Milton. 1968. Beliefs, Attitudes and Values. San Francisco: Josey-Bass.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1984. “Jewish Argument as Sociability.” Language and Society 13(3): 311–335. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sherif, Muzafer, and Carolyn W. Sherif. 1953. Groups in Harmony and Tension. New York: Harper.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watts, Richard. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1992. The Semantics of Interjection. Journal of Pragmatics 18 (2–3): 159–192. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Leong, Alvin Ping
2022. The language of insults: A look at Theme, Rheme and negative inferences. ExELL 10:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Schubert, Tinka, Consol Aguilar, Kyung Hi Kim & Aitor Gómez
2021. Stop Blaming me for What Others Did to you: New Alternative Masculinity’s Communicative Acts Against Blaming Discourses. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue