Article published In: Ideophones: Between Grammar and Poetry
Edited by Katherine Lahti, Rusty Barrett and Anthony K. Webster
[Pragmatics and Society 5:3] 2014
► pp. 484–507
A novel framework for teaching academic writing
Published online: 14 November 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.5.3.10sha
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.5.3.10sha
This study represents an attempt to create a new framework for teaching academic writing. The new concept of the ‘Lexical Cohesive Trio’, LCT, combines elements of textual reference: anaphora, cataphora, and transitional signals (lexical repetition, bundles, and phrases). 30 English majors from the Gulf University for Science and Technology, GUST, in Kuwait were selected to write a pre-framework and a post-framework essay. The results were analysed using an SPSS package t-test. A pairwise t-test confirmed that more transitional signals were produced after the framework was used: t(1,29) = –4.938, p-value < 0.001. Similarly, a pairwise t-test confirmed that more lexical repetitions were produced after the framework was used: t(1,29) = –5.218, p-value < 0.001. Finally, a pairwise t-test confirmed that significantly more lexical phrases were produced after the framework was used: t(1,29) = –10.672, p-value < 0.001. These tests present strong evidence in favour of using LCT, and confirm that using this new framework enhances students’ ability to write coherent essays.
References (18)
Al Sharoufi, Hussain. 2013. “Academic Writing Wizard for Teaching Academic Writing Using Lexical Cohesive Trio.”
EDULEARN Proceedings
, 1780–1787.
Bahns, Jens, Hartmut Burmeister, and Thomas Vogel. 1986. “The Pragmatics of Formulas in L2 Learner Speech: Use and Development.” Journal of Pragmatics 101: 693–723.
Biber, Douglas, and Federica Barbieri. 2007. “Lexical Bundles in University Spoken and Written Registers.” In A Little Bit about Analysing and Teaching Lexical Bundles in Academic Lectures, ed. by E. Neely and V. Cortes . English for Specific Purposes 26: 263–286.
Boers, Frank, Hartmut Burmeister, and Thomas Vogel. 2006. “Formulaic Sequences and Perceived Oral Proficiency: Putting a Lexical Approach to the Test.” Language Teaching Research 31: 245–261.
Carter, Ronald, and Michael McCarthy (eds). 1988. Vocabulary and Language Teaching.
London: Longman.
Cohen, Andrew D., and Jonathan Fine. 1978. Reading History in English: Discourse Analysis and the Experience of Native and Non-native Readers (Working Papers on Bilingualism No. 16). Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Modern Language Centre.
Crossley, Scott, and Thomas Lee Salsbury. 2011. “The Development of Lexical Bundle Accuracy and Production in English Second Language Speakers.” IRAL – International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 49(1): 1–26.
Esther, Geva. 1992. “The Role of Conjunctions in L2 Text Comprehension.” TESOL Quarterly 26 (4): 740–745.
Kafes, Huseyin. 2012. “Lexical Cohesion: An Issue Only in the Foreign Language?” English Language Teaching (Canada) 5 (3): 83–91.
Kurumada, Chigusa. 2009. “The Acquisition and Development of the Topic Marker wa in L1 Japanese: The Role of NP-wa? in Child-mother Interaction.” In Formulaic Language, ed. by Roberta Corrigan, Edith A. Moravcsik, Hamid Ouali, and Kathleen M. Wheatley, 347–374. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ranjbar, Nosrat, Abdolreza Pashakh, and Bahman Gorjian. 2012. “The Effect of Lexical Bundles on Iranian EFL Learners’ Linguistic Production Fluency.” International Education Studies 5 (4): 243–251. Retrieved from [URL].
Witte, Stephen P., and Lester Faigley. 1981. “Coherence, Cohesion, and Writing Quality.” College Composition and Communication 32 (2): 189–204.
Winter, Eugene O. 1979. “Replacement as a Fundamental Function of the Sentence in Context.” Forum Linguisticum 4 (2): 95–133.
Zhan, Lili. 2012. “Analysis of Lexical Repetition-taking a News Discourse as an Example.” Theory and Practice in Language Studies 2 (10): 2160–2167. Retrieved from [URL].
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
