Article published In: Ideophones: Between Grammar and Poetry
Edited by Katherine Lahti, Rusty Barrett and Anthony K. Webster
[Pragmatics and Society 5:3] 2014
► pp. 341–354
Constraints on violating constraints
How languages reconcile the twin dicta of “Be different” and “Be recognizably language”
Published online: 14 November 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.5.3.02chi
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.5.3.02chi
This paper examines the contradictory demands of using language expressively and still qualifying as language, proposing a functional explanation for the form of words in a linguistic word category. Being expressive requires expending more energy, emitting a more robust signal to convey additional information about the speaker, the perception of an event, etc. Doing so requires violating the common linguistic constraints of everyday language, yet to be recognized as language requires that one’s speech obey these same rules. How speakers satisfy these demands tells us about language in both its function and form. The resolution of this dilemma requires the use of suprasegmental rather than segmental features, e.g., a wider range of and more varied use of F0. Because prosodic features are more susceptible to manipulation, they provide the resources for expressivity. Segmental parameters cannot be so easily violated, though manipulating phonotactics remains fair game. Thus we see that there are constraints on violating constraints.
Keywords: prosody, constraints, ideophones, lexicon, African languages, expressiveness
References (42)
Awoyale, Yiwola. 1988. “On the Non-concatenative Morphology of Yoruba Ideophones.” Paper delivered at the 19th African Linguistics Conference, Boston University.
Bentley, Mayrene. 2001. Ideophones and Expressives in Kiswahili and Kinyakyusa. Berkeley: ACAL 32, University of California.
Bybee, Joan L. 2006. Frequency of Use and the Organization of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Byrne, Theresa E. 1993. “A Description of Mende Ideophones.” B.A. Ed. thesis, Language Education Department, Njala University, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
Childs, G. Tucker. 1988. “The Phonology of Kisi Ideophones.” Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 101: 165–190.
. 1994a. “African Ideophones.” In Sound Symbolism, ed. by Leanne Hinton, Johanna Nichols, and John J. Ohala, 247–279. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. 1994b. “Expressiveness in Contact Situations: The Fate of African Ideophones.” Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 91: 257–282.
. 1996. “Where Have all the Ideophones Gone? The Death of a Word Category in Zulu.” Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 15 (2): 81–103.
. 1997. “The Status of Isicamtho, an Nguni-based Urban Variety of Soweto.” In Pidgins and Creoles: Structure and Status, ed. by Arthur K. Spears, and Donald Winford, 341–370. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 1998. “Ideophone Variation is Tied to Local Identity.” In The Sociolinguistics of Language and Society: Selected Papers from SS IX, ed. by Mahendra K. Verma, 36–46. Thousand Oaks, Calif., London, and New Delhi: Sage Publishers.
. 2001. “Research on Ideophones, Whither Hence? The Need for a Social Theory of Ideophones.” In Ideophones, ed. by F.K. Erhard Voeltz, and Christa Kilian-Hatz, 63–73. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2013. “Sound Symbolism.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Word, ed. by John R. Taylor, In press. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DeCamp, David. 1974. “Neutralizations, Iteratives, and Ideophones: The Locus of Language in Jamaica.” In Pidgins and Creoles: Current Trends and Prospects, ed. by David DeCamp and Ian F. Hancock, 46–60. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
Dingemanse, Mark. 2011. The Meaning and Use of Ideophones in Siwu. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
Feld, Steven. 1982. Sound and Sentiment: Birds, Weeping, Poetics, and Song in Kaluli Expression. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Finlayson, Rosalie. 1995. “Women’s Language of Respect: Isihlonipho Sabafazi.” In Language and Social History: Studies in South African Sociolinguistics, ed. by Rajend Mesthrie, 140–153. Cape Town and Johannesburg: David Philip.
Gordon, Matthew. 2007. “Functionalism in Phonology.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology, ed. by Paul V. De Lacy, 61–77. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. 1990b. “The Sociohistory of Clicks in Southern Bantu.” Anthropological Linguistics 32 (3–4): 295–315.
Hinton, Leanne, Johanna Nichols, and John J. Ohala. 1994. “Introduction: Sound-symbolic Processes.” In Sound Symbolism, ed. by Leanne Hinton, Johanna Nichols, and John J.
Ohala, 1–12. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kraut, Robert E., and Robert E. Johnston. 1979. “Social and Emotional Messages of Smiling: An Ethological Approach.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37 (9): 1539–1553.
Maduka, Omen N. 1988. “The Km Critical Psychomorph in Igbo.” Paper presented at the Ninth Annual Conference of the Linguistic Association of Nigeria (Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria, 31 July–4 August 1988).
McGregor, William B. 2001. “Ideophones as the Source of Verbs in Northern Australian Languages.” In Ideophones, ed. by F.K. Erhard Voeltz and Christa Kilian-Hatz, 205–222.
Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Newman, Paul. 1968. “Ideophones From a Syntactic Point of View.” Journal of West African Languages 51: 107–118.
Nuckolls, Janis B. 1996. Sounds Like Life: Sound-Symbolic Grammar, Performance and Cognition in Pastaza Quechua. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Ohala, John J. 1984. “An Ethological Perspective on Common Cross-language Utilization of F0 of Voice.” Phonetica 411: 1–16.
Schultze-Berndt, Eva. 2001. “Ideophone-like Characteristics of Uninflected Predicates in Jaminjung (Australia).” In Ideophones, ed. by F.K. Erhard Voeltz, and Christa Kilian-Hatz, 355–373. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Stewart, Potter. 1964. US Supreme Court decision. Jacobellis vs. Ohio, 378 U.S. 184 ([URL], accessed 5 Oct. 2014).
Tsur, Reuven. 1992. What Makes Sound Patterns Expressive? The Poetic Mode of Speech Expression. Durham, N.C. and London: Duke University Press.
Ultan, Russell. 1978. “Size-sound Symbolism.” In Universals of Human Language, ed. by Joseph
H. Greenberg, Charles A. Ferguson, and Edith A. Moravcsik, 525–568. Stanford, Calif.:
Stanford University Press.
Voeltz, F.K. Erhard, and Christa Kilian-Hatz (eds). 2001. Ideophones. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (7)
Cited by seven other publications
Kwon, Nahyun & Keiko Masuda
Kwon, Nahyun
Nuckolls, Janis B., Tod D. Swanson, Diana Shelton, Alexander Rice & Sarah Hatton
Styles, Suzy J. & Lauren Gawne
Dingemanse, Mark
Dingemanse, Mark, Damián E. Blasi, Gary Lupyan, Morten H. Christiansen & Padraic Monaghan
Lahti, Katherine
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
