Article published In: Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 5:2 (2014) ► pp.296–316
‘Father knows best’
Therapy as entertainment
Published online: 25 August 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.5.2.06mac
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.5.2.06mac
This paper examines two realisations of the television talk show in North America: The Oprah Winfrey Show and Dr. Phil, looking specifically at how they function within the sub-genre of ‘therapeutic talk show’ in keeping with Livingstone and Lunt’s (1994) classification of talk shows. Talk shows are defined by Ilie (2001) as “semi-institutional discourse” having features of a given setting (TV studio), topic- and goal-oriented talk, high degree of topic control, as well as restrictions on time and turn-taking. Theorists examining this sub-genre of therapeutic talk show have argued that it provides a valuable means by which stories otherwise unrecognized have a forum, or that values of truth and honesty can be conveyed (Livingstone & Lunt 1994; Masciarotte 1991; Carbaugh 1988). However, theorists such as Abt and Seesholtz (1994) view therapeutic talk shows as potentially demeaning to guests who appear on them as well as a means by which suffering can be trivialized. Through an examination and analysis of requests for information, both direct and indirect, which are the principal features of all interviews, I look at how Oprah Winfrey and Dr. Phil problematize the narratives told by their guests. Both hosts rely heavily on one type of request, B-Event assertions functioning as indirect requests for information, to provoke specific response. My findings indicate that these talk shows do not in fact provide a forum for talk that would otherwise not be considered as suggested by Livingstone and Lunt (1994). Both Oprah Winfrey and Dr. Phil appropriate the stories provided by their guests; they also participate in their own overarching meta-narrative whereby as ‘heroes’ they solve their guests’ problems within a given time frame. Guests’ narrative responses share more with the speech act of confession than with free self-expression. The speech act of confession encouraged by these therapeutic talk shows serves in turn to reinforce conservatively-held values on the part of the at-home audience for whom such confession is also entertainment.
References (22)
Abt, Vicki, and Mel Seesholtz. 1994. The shameless world of Phil, Sally and Oprah: Television Talk shows and the deconstruction of society. Journal of Popular Culture 28(1): 171–191.
Brinton, Laurel J. 1988. The development of English aspectual systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, Penelope, and Steven Levinson. 1987. Politeness Some universals in language usage.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haarman, Louann. 2001. Performing Talk.In Television Talk Shows, ed. by Andrew Tolson, 31–64. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Harris, Sandra. 1984. Questions as a mode of control in magistrates’ courts. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 491: 5–27.
Ilie, Cornelia. 2001. Semi-institutional discourse: The case of talk shows. Journal of Pragmatics 331: 209–254.
Kiefer, Ferenc. 1988. On the pragmatics of answers.In Questions and questioning, ed. by Michel Meyer, 255–279. New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Labov, William, and Joshua Waletzky. 1997. Narrative Analysis: Oral Versions of Personal Experience. Journal of Narrative and Life History 7(1–4): 3–38.
Macaulay, Marcia. 1996. Asking to ask: The strategic function of indirect requests for information in interviews. Pragmatics 6(4): 491–509.
. 2001. Tough talk: Indirectness and gender in requests for information. Journal of Pragmatics 331: 293–316.
Masciarotte, Gloria-Jean. 1991. ‘C’Mon, Girl’: Oprah Winfrey and the Discourse of Feminine Talk. Genders 11(Fall): 81–110.
Ochs, Elinor, and Carolyn Taylor. 2001. The ‘Father Knows Best’ Dynamic in Dinnertime Narratives.In Linguistic Anthropology. A Reader, ed. by Alessandro Duranti1, 431–449. Oxford: Blackwell.