Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 5:2 (2014) ► pp.191220

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (44)
Allee, Verna. 2002. Value networks and evolving business models for the knowledge economy. In: Handbook on Knowledge Management, Clyde W. Holsapple (ed), 605–621. Berlin: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Asmuß, Birte and Oshima, Sae. 2012. Negotiation of entitlement in proposal sequences. Discourse Studies 14, 1, 67–86. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beach, Wayne A. 1993. Transitional regularities for ‘casual’ “Okay” usages. Journal of Pragmatics 191, 325–352. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Betz, Emma and Golato, Andrea. 2008. Remembering relevant information and withholding relevant next actions: The German token ach ja . Research on Language and Social Interaction 41, 1, 58–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolden, Galina. 2008. “So what’s up?”: Using the discourse marker “so” to launch conversational business. Research on Language and Social Interaction 41, 3, 302–327. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buur, Jacob, Ankenbrand, Bernd and Mitchell, Robb. 2013. Participatory Business Modeling. CoDesign 9, 1, 55–71.
Buur, Jacob and Matthews, Ben. 2008. Participatory innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management 12, 3, 255–273. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drew, Paul. 1991. Asymmetries of knowledge in conversational interactions. In: Asymmetries in Dialogue, Ivana Marková and Klaus Foppa (eds), 29–48. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. What Drives Sequences? Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45, 1, 61–68. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1971. Relations in Public. Microstudies of the Public Order. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1976. Replies and responses. Language in Society 5, 3, 257–313. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 1996. Transparent Vision. In: Interaction and Grammar, Elinor Ochs, 
Emanuel A. Schegloff and Sandra Thompson (eds), 370–404. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haakana, Markku. 2001. Laughter as a patient’s resource: Dealing with delicate aspects of medical interaction. Text 21, 1/2, 187–219.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hayano, Kaoru. 2011. Claiming epistemic primacy: yo-marked assessments in Japanese. In: The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada and Jakob Steensig (eds), 58–81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heinemann, Trine, Lindström, Anna and Steensig, Jakob. 2011. Addressing epistemic incongruence in question-answer sequences through the use of epistemic adverbs. In: The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada and Jakob Steensig (eds), 107–130. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heinemann, Trine, Landgrebe, Jeanette, Mitchell, Robb and Buur, Jacob. forthc. Narrating value networks and business models through tangible materials. To appear in: Materiality & Storytelling. TAMARA special issue.
Heritage, John. 1984. A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In: Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, J. Maxwell Atkinson and John 
Heritage (eds), 229–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Conversation Analysis as Social Theory. In: The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory, Bryan S. Turner (ed), 300–320. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Territories of Knowledge, Territories of Experience: Empathic Moments in Interaction. In: The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, Tanya Stivers, Lorenza 
Mondada and Jakob Steensig (eds), 159–183. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012a. The Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 451, 30–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012b. Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 451, 1–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012c. Epistemics in Conversation. In: Handbook of Conversation Analysis, Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers (eds), 370–394. Boston: Wiley-Blackwell.
Heritage, John and Raymond, Geoffrey. 2005. The terms of agreement: indexing epistemic authority and subordination in assessment sequences. Social Psychology Quarterly 68, 1, 15–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John and Roth, Andrew. 1995. Grammar and Institution: Questions and Questioning in the Broadcast News Interview. Research on Language and Social Interaction 28, 1, 1–60. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 2004. Glossary of transcript symbols with an Introduction. In: Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation, Gene H. Lerner (ed), 13–23. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kamio, Akio. 1997. Territories of information. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Knudsen, Anette Dahl. 2002/2003. “O(↑)kay(?), ↑Ohkay”: En prosodiafhængig ytringspartikel. [“O(↑)kay(?), ↑Ohkay”: A prosody-dependent discourse particle.] Unpublished manuscript, University of Aarhus, Denmark.
Labov, Willam and Fanshel, David. 1977. Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Linell, Per and Luckmann, Thomas. 1991. Asymmetries in dialogue: Some conceptual preliminaries. In: Asymmetries in Dialogue, Ivana Marková and Klaus Foppa (eds), 1–20. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita. 1980. Telling my side: ‘limited access’ as a ‘fishing’ device. Sociological Inquiry 501, 186–198. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1984a. Giving a source or basis: the practice in conversation of telling ‘how I know’. Journal of Pragmatics 81, 607–625. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1984b. Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In: Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage (eds), 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1984c. Pursuing a response. In: Structures of Social Action. Studies in conversation Analysis, J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage (eds), 152–163. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raymond, Geoffrey and Heritage, John. 2006. The epistemics of social relations: owning grandchildren. Language in Society 351, 677–705. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1984. On doing ‘being ordinary’. In: Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage (eds), 413–429. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emanuel A. and Jefferson, Gail. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 501, 696–735. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sidnell, Jack. 2011. The epistemics of make-believe. In: The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, Tanya Stivers,Lorenza Mondada and Jakob Steensig (eds), 131–155. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steensig, Jakob and Heinemann, Trine. In press. The social and moral work of modal constructions in granting remote requests. In: Requesting in Social Interaction, Paul Drew and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (eds). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Stivers, Tanya, Mondada, Lorenza and Steensig, Jakob. 2011. The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya and Rossano, Federico. 2010. Mobilizing Response. Research on Language and Social Interaction 43, 1, 1–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya. 2011. Morality and question design: ”of course” as contesting a presupposition of askability. In: The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada and Jakob Steensig (eds), 82–106. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Svennevig, Jan. 2008. Trying the easiest solution first in other-initiated repair, Journal of Pragmatics 40, 2, 333–348. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Landgrebe, Jeanette, Robb Mitchell, Trine Heinemann & Jacob Buur
2025. Narrating value networks through tangible materials. CoDesign  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Due, Brian L.
2022. Situated co-operative creativity. Pragmatics and Society 13:4  pp. 684 ff. DOI logo
Thompson, Neil Aaron & Orla Byrne
2022. Imagining Futures: Theorizing the Practical Knowledge of Future-making. Organization Studies 43:2  pp. 247 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue