Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 5:2 (2014) ► pp.165–190

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

From paper to practice

Asking and responding to a standardized question item in performance appraisal interviews

 | Uppsala University, Sweden
 | Karlstad University, Sweden
Published online: 25 August 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.5.2.01nyr
This paper examines how a standardized question is launched and received in a corpus of performance appraisal interviews, with a focus on how pre-­formulated questions are translated into interaction. Using conversation analysis, we demonstrate that the same question becomes many different actions in practice. Prefaces as well as prosodic and lexical alterations make relevant different responses, and as such, the question can be recruited to initiate diverse interactional projects such as assessments and other socially delicate activities. As a consequence, goals of uniformity and standardization may be subverted. The interactional adaptations further evidence the strength of recipient design as reformulations also result in more fitted and personalized answers. Our study contributes to the understanding of standardization versus interactionalization, and points to the strong interrelationship between question design and the fitting of response options.
References (46)
Adams, Katherine. 1981. Question/Answer adjacency pairs in a performance appraisal interview. Journal of Applied Communication Research 9 (2), 72–84. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Antaki, Charles. 1999. Assessing quality of life of persons with a learning disability: how setting lower standards may inflate well-being scores. Qualitative Health Research 91, 437–454. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Personalized revision of ‘failed’ questions. Discourse Studies 4 (4), 411–428.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Antaki, Charles (Ed.). (2011. Applied conversation analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Asmuß, Birte. 2006. En undersøgelse om medarbejderudviklingssamtaler i en større dansk virksomhed. Aarhus School of Business: Center for Virksomhedskommunikation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Performance appraisal interviews. Preference organization in assessment sequences. Journal of Business Communication 45 (4), 408–429. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gordon, Michael & Lea P. Stewart. 2009. Conversing about performance. Discursive resources for the appraisal interview. Management Communication Quarterly 22 (3), 473–501. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1979. Footing. Semiotica 251, 1–29. [Reprinted in Goffman 1981.] Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1981. Forms of Talk. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harré, Rom. 1979. Social Being: A Theory for Social Psychology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John & Steven Clayman. 2010. Talk in Action: Interaction, Identities, and Institutions. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John & Marja-Leena Sorjonen. 1994. Constituting and maintaining activities across sequences: And-prefacing as a feature of question design. Language in Society 231, 1–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Houtkoop-Steenstra, Hanneke. 1996. Probing behaviors of interviewers in the standardized semi-open research interview. Quality and Quantity 301, 591–623. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. Interaction and the Standardized Survey Interview: the Living Questionnaire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Houtkoop-Steenstra, Hanneke & Charles Antaki. 1997. Creating happy people by asking Yes-No questions. Research on Language and Social Interaction 30 (4), 285–313. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hutchby, Ian & Robin Wooffitt. 1998. Conversation Analysis: Principles, Practices and Applications. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lazaraton, Anne. 2002. A Qualitative Approach to the Validation of Oral Langauge Tests. 
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1988. Putting linguistics on a proper footing: Explorations in Goffman’s concepts of participation. In Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order, Paul Drew & Anthony Wootton (eds.), 161–227. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lindgren, Maria. 2001. Utvecklingssamtal mellan chefer och medarbetare. Undersökning av en samtalstyp i arbetslivet. [Staff development talks between managers and employees. A study of an interaction type in working life.] Lund University, Lundastudier i nordisk språkvetenskap, A 56.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marlaire, Courtney L. & Douglas W. Maynard. 1990. Standardized testing as an interactional phenomenon. Sociology of Education 631, 83–101. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maynard, Douglas W. & Nora Cate Schaeffer. 2000. Toward a sociology of scientific knowledge: survey research and ethnomethodology’s asymmetric alternates. Social Studies of Science 301, 323–370. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maynard, Douglas W., Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra, Nora Cate Schaeffer & Johannes Van der Zouwen (eds). 2002. Standardization and Tacit Knowledge: Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Kazuko. 1999. And-prefaced questions in institutional discourse. Linguistics 37(2), 251–274. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mikkelsen, Aslaug. 1998. Medarbetarsamtal och lärande i organisationer. [Performance appraisal interviews and learning in organizations]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nevile, Maurice. 2006. Making sequentiality salient: and-prefacing in the talk of airline pilots. Discourse Studies 81, 279–302. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nyroos, Lina. 2012. The Social Organization of Institutional Norms: The Interactional Management of Knowledge, Entitlement and Stance. Dissertation. Uppsala: Uppsala University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peräkylä, Anssi & Sanna Vehviläinen. 2003. Conversation analysis and the professional stocks of interactional knowledge. Discourse & Society 14 (6), 727–750. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita. 1980. Telling my side: ‘limited access’ as a ‘fishing’ device. Sociological Inquiry 501, 186–198. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1984. Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In Structures of Social Action. Studies in Conversational Analysis, J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (eds), 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Potter, Jonathan. 2003. Studying the standardized survey as interaction. Qualitative Research 3 (2), 269–278. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Potter, Jonathan & Alexa Hepburn. 2005. Qualitative interviews in psychology: problems and possibilities. Qualitative Research in Psychology 21, 281–307. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Life is out there: A comment on Griffin. Discourse Studies 9 (2), 276–282. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rapley, Tim. 2001. The artfulness of open-ended interviewing: some considerations on analyzing interviews. Qualitative Research 11, 303–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Interviews. In Qualitative Research Practice, Clive Seale, Giampietro Gobo, Jaber F. Gubrium & David Silverman (eds), 15–33. London: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roulston, Kathryn. 2006. Close encounters of the ‘CA’ kind: a review of literature analyzing talk in research interviews. Qualitative Research 6 (4), 515–534. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on Conversation, Volume II1. In Harvey Sacks: Lectures on Conversation. Edited by Gail Jefferson; with an introduction by Emanuel A. Schegloff. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Gail Jefferson. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50 (4), 696–735. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sandlund, Erica, Christina Olin-Scheller, Lina Nyroos, Liselotte Jakobsen & Cecilia Nahnfeldt. 2011. The performance appraisal interview – An arena for the reinforcement of norms for employeeship. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies 1 (2), 59–75. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schaeffer, Nora Cate & Stanley Presser. 2003. The science of asking questions. Annual Review of Sociology 291, 65–88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2001. Getting serious: Joke → serious ‘no’. Journal of Pragmatics 331, 1947–1955. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scherp, Hans-Åke, Gun-Britt Scherp, Per-Olov Johansson & Eva Jönsson. 2004. Lärande medarbetarsamtal. [Learning employee development talks.] Karlstad: Karlstad University. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seedhouse, Paul & Egbert, Maria. 2006. The interactional organization of the IELTS speaking test. IELTS Research Reports 61, 161–205.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silverman, David. 2001. Interpreting qualitative data: methods for analyzing talk, text and interaction. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, Lorenza Mondada & Jakob Steensig. 2011. Knowledge, morality and affiliation in social interaction. In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada & Jakob Steensig (eds.), 3–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Suchman, Lucy & Brigitte Jordan. 1990. Interactional troubles in face-to-face survey interviews. Journal of the American Statistical Association 851, 232–241. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

De Malsche, Fien, Els Tobback & Mieke Vandenbroucke
2024. Multilingualism in performance appraisal interviews: strategies to bridge language gaps. Frontiers in Communication 9 DOI logo
Malsche, Fien De, Els Tobback & Mieke Vandenbroucke
2025. Recontextualizing Negative Feedback Through Talk and Text in Corporate Performance Appraisal Processes. International Journal of Business Communication 62:4 ► pp. 752 ff. DOI logo
Mohd Noh, Muhamad Firdaus & Mohd Effendi Ewan Mohd Matore
2022. Rater severity differences in English language as a second language speaking assessment based on rating experience, training experience, and teaching experience through many-faceted Rasch measurement analysis. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Previtali, Federica & Simona Spedale
2021. Doing age in the workplace: Exploring age categorisation in performance appraisal. Journal of Aging Studies 59 ► pp. 100981 ff. DOI logo
Pulido, Cristina M., Ana Vidu, Sandra Racionero-Plaza & Lídia Puigvert
2021. I Do It, but I Decide With Whom. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo
Melander Bowden, Helen & Erica Sandlund
2019. Knowledge talk in performance appraisal interviews. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 21 ► pp. 278 ff. DOI logo
Sundqvist, Pia, Peter Wikström, Erica Sandlund & Lina Nyroos
2018. The teacher as examiner of L2 oral tests: A challenge to standardization. Language Testing 35:2 ► pp. 217 ff. DOI logo
Sandlund, Erica, Pia Sundqvist & Lina Nyroos
2016. Testing L2 Talk: A Review of Empirical Studies on Second‐Language Oral Proficiency Testing. Language and Linguistics Compass 10:1 ► pp. 14 ff. DOI logo
Sandlund, Erica
2014. Prescribing conduct: Enactments of talk or thought in advice-giving sequences. Discourse Studies 16:5 ► pp. 645 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue