Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 5:1 (2014) ► pp.76–104

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

(Im)politeness during Prime Minister’s Questions in the U.K. Parliament

Published online: 5 May 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.5.1.04mur
Prime Minister’s Questions (PMQs) is a weekly, half-hour long session in the British House of Commons, which gives backbench Members of Parliament (MPs) and the Leader of the Opposition (LO) the opportunity to ask the Prime Minister (PM) questions on any topic relating to the government’s policies and actions. The discourse at PMQs is often described as adversarial (see Bull & Wells 2011) and in this paper I will show how the notion of impoliteness can be applied to both the questions and the answers which make up the session. Through the detailed analysis of six sessions of PMQs I will also demonstrate that PMQs is also a source of polite linguistic behaviour of the sort described in Brown & Levinson’s (1987) politeness theory. Comparisons between Gordon Brown’s and David Cameron’s speech styles will also be drawn.
References (28)
Bousfield, Derek & Miriam Locher (eds). 2008. Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice .Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson. 1987 [1978]. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bull, Peter & Pam Wells. 2011. ‘Adversarial discourse in Prime Minister’s Questions’. A paper presented at the 12th International Pragmatics Conference , Manchester, 4th July 2011.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, Rong. 2001. Self-politeness: A Proposal. Journal of Pragmatics 331, 87–106. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven, Marc Elliot, John Heritage & Laurie McDonald. 2007. When does the Watch­dog Bark? Conditions of Aggressive Questioning in Presidential News Conferences. American Sociological Review 721, 23–41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. 1996. Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics 251, 349–367. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010. Conventionalised Impoliteness Formulae. Journal of Pragmatics 421, 3232–3245. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2011. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, Derek Bousfield & Anne Wichmann. 2003. Impoliteness Revisited: With Special Reference to Dynamic and Prosodic Aspects. Journal of Pragmatics 351, 1545–1579. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erskine May. 2004. Erskine May’s Treatise of the law, privileges, proceedings and usage of Parliament . 23rd edition. London: Butterworths Law.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of Talk . Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harris, Sandra. 2001. Being Politically Impolite: Extending Politeness Theory to Adversarial Political Discourse. Discourse & Society 121, 451–472. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael. 2007. The Discursive Challenge to Politeness: An Interactional Alternative. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour and Culture 31, 295–317. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 2004. Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction. In: Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation , Gene Lerner (ed), 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnston, Joni. 2007. Don’t Patronize me: How to Handle Condescending Remarks from a Co-worker and How Not to Set Yourself Up . (Pamphlet). Chicago: Telus Talk Business.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ilie, Cornelia. 2010. Strategic Uses of Parliamentary Forms of Address: The Case of the U. K. Parliament and the Swedish Riksdag. Journal of Pragmatics 421, 885–911. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular . Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics . London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen. 1988. Putting Linguistics on a Proper Footing: Explorations in Goffman’s Participation Framework. In: Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order , Paul Drew & Anthony Wootton (eds), 161–227. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marshall-Andrews, Bob. 2011. Off Message: The Complete Antidote to Political Humbug . London: Profile Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meyerhoff, Miriam. 2006. Introducing Sociolinguistics . London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rockwell, Patricia. 2000. Lower, Slower, Louder: Vocal Cues of Sarcasm. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 291, 483–495. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2000. Rapport Management: A Framework for Analysis. In: Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport Through Talk Across Cultures , Helen Spencer-Oatey (ed), 11–46. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
The Linguistic Politeness Research Group (ed.). 2011. Discursive Approaches to Politeness . Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tracy, Karen. 1990. The Many Faces of Facework. In: Handbook of Language and Social Psychology, Howard Giles and William Robinson (eds.), 209–226. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008. ‘Reasonable Hostility’: Situation-appropriate face-attack. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour and Culture 41, 169–191. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watts, Richard. 2003. Politeness . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (30)

Cited by 30 other publications

Hames, Sam, Michael Haugh & Simon Musgrave
2025. “How is that unparliamentary?”: The metapragmatics of ‘unparliamentary’ language in the Australian Federal Parliament. Lingua 320 ► pp. 103932 ff. DOI logo
van ’t Riet, Jonathan, Annemarie S. Walter & Emma Turkenburg
2025. Uncivil political discourse in televised election debates in the Netherlands from 1981 to 2023. Acta Politica DOI logo
Galais, Carol & Sandra Bermúdez
2024. Understanding Conflict Dynamics in Spanish Parliament: MPs’ Personality Traits and Attitudes Toward Conflict. American Behavioral Scientist DOI logo
Serban, Ruxandra
2024. Conflictual behaviour in legislatures: Exploring and explaining adversarial remarks in oral questions to prime ministers. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 26:2 ► pp. 548 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Huiyu, Junxiang Zhao & Yicheng Wu
2024. Disagreeing without tears. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 37:2 ► pp. 518 ff. DOI logo
Bataineh, Rula Fahmi , Ruba F. Bataineh & Lara K. Andraws
2023. How Polite can Impoliteness be? A Jordanian Gendered Perspective. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies ► pp. 16 ff. DOI logo
Reber, Elisabeth
2023. On the ritualization of commemorative practices: Paying tribute in British Prime Minister's Questions. Journal of Pragmatics 214 ► pp. 92 ff. DOI logo
Walter, Annemarie & Željko Poljak
2023. Incivility from the UK Prime Minister’s Dispatch Box: A Comparative Study of PM Question Time Attacks, 2010–2020. In Political Debasement, ► pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Fetzer, Anita
2022. ‘For (…) a leader like this Prime Minister to talk about morals and morality is a disgrace’: offensive action, uptake and moral implications in the context of parliamentary debates. Language & Communication 87 ► pp. 135 ff. DOI logo
Kwiatkowska, Agnieszka
2022. „Hańba w Sejmie” – zastosowanie modeli generatywnych do analizy debat parlamentarnych. Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej 13:2 ► pp. 82 ff. DOI logo
Convery, Alan, Pavielle Haines, James Mitchell & David C. W. Parker
2021. Questioning scrutiny: the effect of Prime Minister’s Questions on citizen efficacy and trust in parliament. The Journal of Legislative Studies 27:2 ► pp. 207 ff. DOI logo
Culpeper, Jonathan & Vittorio Tantucci
2021. The Principle of (Im)politeness Reciprocity. Journal of Pragmatics 175 ► pp. 146 ff. DOI logo
Bull, Peter, Anita Fetzer & Dániel Z. Kádár
2020. Calling Mr Speaker ‘Mr Speaker’. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 30:1 ► pp. 64 ff. DOI logo
Shaw, Sylvia
2020. Women, Language and Politics, DOI logo
Shephard, Mark & Daniel Braby
2020. Questions to the PM versus questions by the PM: an examination of the state and nature of ‘Punch and Judy’ politics during PMQs at Westminster. The Journal of Legislative Studies 26:1 ► pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
Wei, Jennifer M.
2020. Naming candidates as preemptive discursive practice: The 2016 Taiwan presidential race. Journal of Pragmatics 166 ► pp. 84 ff. DOI logo
Graham, Ruth
2019. The users of unparliamentary language in the New Zealand House of Representatives 1890 to 1950: A community of practice perspective. Journal of Pragmatics 149 ► pp. 14 ff. DOI logo
Nowak, Bartholomäus
2019. Impoliteness in parliamentary questions. In Political discourse in Central, Eastern and Balkan Europe [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 84], ► pp. 147 ff. DOI logo
Waddle, Maurice, Peter Bull & Jan R. Böhnke
2019. “He Is Just the Nowhere Man of British Politics”: Personal Attacks in Prime Minister’s Questions. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 38:1 ► pp. 61 ff. DOI logo
Lopez-Ozieblo, Renia
2018. Disagreeing without a ‘no’: How teachers indicate disagreement in a Hong Kong classroom. Journal of Pragmatics 137 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Mollin, Sandra
2018. The use of face-threatening acts in the construction of in- and out-group identities in British parliamentary debates. In The Discursive Construction of Identities On- and Offline [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 78], ► pp. 205 ff. DOI logo
Culpeper, Jonathan & Claire Hardaker
2017. Impoliteness. In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, ► pp. 199 ff. DOI logo
Tracy, Karen
2017. Facework and (Im)politeness in Political Exchanges. In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, ► pp. 739 ff. DOI logo
Culpeper, Jonathan
2016. Impoliteness Strategies. In Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 4], ► pp. 421 ff. DOI logo
Sealey, Alison & Stephen Bates
2016. Prime ministerial self-reported actions in Prime Minister's Questions 1979–2010: A corpus-assisted analysis. Journal of Pragmatics 104 ► pp. 18 ff. DOI logo
Murphy, James
2015. Revisiting the apology as a speech act. Journal of Language and Politics 14:2 ► pp. 175 ff. DOI logo
Murphy, James
2016. Apologies made at the Leveson Inquiry. Pragmatics and Society 7:4 ► pp. 595 ff. DOI logo
Murphy, James
2019. Apologising. In The Discursive Construction of Blame, ► pp. 201 ff. DOI logo
Murphy, James
2019. Openings: Terms, Conditions and Getting Started. In The Discursive Construction of Blame, ► pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. The Politics of Person Reference [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 320], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue