Article published In: Space for all? European perspectives on minority languages and identity
Edited by Dawn Archer, Christopher Williams and Paul Fryer
[Pragmatics and Society 4:2] 2013
► pp. 240–257
“Mutual understanding” in Tatarstan?
Teachers’ and pupils’ attitudes to Tatar and Russian in Tatar and non-Tatar gymnásias
Published online: 21 June 2013
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.4.2.07alv
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.4.2.07alv
This paper is based on ethnographic research conducted in Tatarstan between 1997 and 2000, during the process of ethno-national rebirth, when promotion of the Tatar language emerged as a key element of government policy. At this time, the linguistic landscape in Tatarstan was characterized by four distinct features which, far from being complementary, existed in a state of mutual tension: (1) a monolinguistic heritage, due to the historical dominance of Russian; (2) a claimed ‘bilingualism’ following the declaration of Tatarstan’s sovereignty; (3) the ethno-linguistic revival of Tatar, evident in some institutional contexts; and (4) the global monolinguistic hegemony of English in scientific and technological discourse, which made proficiency in English essential. Taking this complex background into account, this article analyzes the different attitudes to the Tatar language shown by pupils and teachers in Tatar and non-Tatar gymnásias (specialist secondary schools) in the capital city of Kazan.
Keywords: Tatar language, identities, Russian language, schools, bilingualism, Tatarstan
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Mikhienko, Anna, Ekaterina S. Oshchepkova & Maria S. Kovyazina
Tovar-García, Edgar Demetrio
Tovar-García, Edgar Demetrio & Evgeny Podmazin
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
