Article published In: Evidentiality in Interaction
Edited by Janis B. Nuckolls and Lev Michael
[Pragmatics and Society 3:2] 2012
► pp. 270–293
“Watching for witness”
Evidential strategies and epistemic authority in Garrwa conversation
Published online: 12 October 2012
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.3.2.07mus
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.3.2.07mus
Linguistic forms with dedicated evidential meanings have been described for a number of Australian languages (eg. Donaldson 1980, Laughren 1982, Wilkins 1989) but there has been little written on how these are used in social interaction. This paper examines evidential strategies in ordinary Garrwa conversations, by taking into account what we know more generally about the status of knowledge and epistemic authority in Aboriginal societies, and applying this understanding to account for the ways knowledge is managed in ‘ordinary’ interactions.
Cited by (16)
Cited by 16 other publications
Pan, Yun
Domínguez Romero, Elena
Khachaturyan, Maria
Rozumko, Agata
Rozumko, Agata
Wilks, Matti, Jonathan Redshaw, Ilana Mushin & Mark Nielsen
Celle, Agnès
2018. J. I. Marίn Arrese, G. Haβler, & M. Carretero (Eds.).Evidentiality revisited: Cognitive grammar, functional and discourse-pragmatic perspectives. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 16:2 ► pp. 519 ff.
Besnard, Anne-Laure
2017. BE likely to and BE expected to, epistemic modality or evidentiality?. In Evidentiality Revisited [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 271], ► pp. 249 ff.
Hidalgo-Downing, Laura
2017. Evidential and epistemic stance strategies in scientific communication. In Evidentiality Revisited [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 271], ► pp. 225 ff.
Hidalgo-Downing, Laura
Neldner, Karri, Ilana Mushin & Mark Nielsen
González, Montserrat
Nielsen, Mark, Ilana Mushin, Keyan Tomaselli & Andrew Whiten
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
