Article published In: Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 16:5 (2025) ► pp.653–675
“I am not populist”
Mechanisms for the re-negotiation of category membership on Twitter
Published online: 21 November 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.24027.fil
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.24027.fil
Abstract
Situated within studies on discourses about populism (De Cleen, Benjamin, Jason Glynos, and Aurelien Mondon. 2018. “Critical Research on Populism: Nine Rules of Engagement.” Organization 25 (5): 649–61. ), this paper zooms in on the use, meanings, and role of the word populist in contemporary socio-political debates
and, more specifically, on social media. This paper examines populist as stigma term (Kranert, Michael. 2020. “When
Populists Call Populists Populists: ‘Populism’ and ‘Populist’ as Political Keywords in German and British Political
Discourse.” In Michael Kranert (ed.) Discursive Approaches to Populism Across Disciplines:
The Return of Populists and the People. Springer. 31–60. ) and seeks to determine how people negotiate their categorisation as (non-)populist — and hence the meaning of
this category — on Twitter. Based on the analysis of 139 tweets including the phrase “I am not populist” in four different
languages (Dutch, French, English, Spanish), we propose that two patterns can be identified for the renegotiation of users’
identities as populist: denial and self-categorisation. This analysis confirms that populist as a category can refer to a variety
of (political) attitudes and orientations and shows the consequences of the polysemous nature of populist while proving that, in
certain contexts, populist refers to some specific and stable categories.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.State of the art
- 2.1On meanings and connotations of populism and populist
- 2.2Negotiating, rejecting, or denying a membership categorisation
- 3.Data and method
- 3.1Data
- 3.2Method
- 4.Results
- 4.1Rejecting a categorisation: IANP as a denial
- 4.2Negation and self-categorisation: IANP as an assessment
- 5.Conclusion
- Notes
References
References (44)
Antaki, Charles & Widdicombe, Sue. 1998. “Identity
as an Achievement and as a Tool.” In Carles Antaki and Sue Widdicombe (eds.) Identities in
Talk, London: Sage. 1–13
Bale, Tim; van Kessel, Stijn & Taggart, Paul. 2011. “Thrown
around with abandon? Popular understandings of populism as conveyed by the print media: A UK case
study.” Acta
Politica 461, 111–131.
Berry, Keith. 2021. “Autoethnography.” The
Cambridge Handbook of Identity. Edited by Michael Bamberg, Carolin Demuth, Meike Watzlawik. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 324–344.
Brown, Katy, and Aurelien Mondon. 2021. “Populism,
the Media, and the Mainstreaming of the Far Right: The Guardian’s Coverage of Populism as a Case
Study.” Politics 41 (3): 279–95.
Canovan, Margaret. 1999. “Trust
the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy.” Political
Studies 47 (1): 2–16.
Dancygier, Barbara. 2012. Negation,
stance, and subjectivity. In Barbara Dancygier & Eve Sweetser (eds). Viewpoint
in language: A multimodal
perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 69–96.
De Cleen, Benjamin, Jason Glynos, and Aurelien Mondon. 2018. “Critical Research on Populism: Nine Rules of Engagement.” Organization 25 (5): 649–61.
De Cock, Barbara and Pizarro Pedraza, Andrea. 2018. “From expressing solidarity to mocking on Twitter: pragmatic functions of hashtags starting with #jesuis across languages.” Language in
Society 47 (2): 197–217.
De Cock, Barbara, Hambye, Philippe, Rondiat Coline, and Nadezda Shchinova (eds.). (In press). Keywords
in sociopolitical debates: confronting different approaches to struggles about meaning in discourse. Journal of
Corpora and Discourse Studies [Special Issue].
De Vreese, Claes H., Frank Esser, Toril Aalberg, Carsten Reinemann, and James Stanyer. 2018. “Populism
as an Expression of Political Communication Content and Style: A New Perspective.” The
International Journal of
Press/Politics 23 (4): 423–438.
Demata, Massimiliano, Michelangelo Conoscenti, and Yannis Stavrakakis. 2020. “Riding
the Populist Wave. Metaphors of Populism and Anti-Populism in the Daily Mail and The
Guardian.” Iperstoria 151.
DuBois, John. 2007. “The
Stance Triangle.” In Robert Engelbretson (ed) Stancetaking
in Discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation,
interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 139–182.
Goyvaerts, Jana, and Benjamin De Cleen. 2020. “Media,
Anti-Populist Discourse and the Dynamics of the Populism
Debate.” In Perspectives on Populism and the
Media. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft. 83–108.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 2014. Halliday’s Introduction
to Functional Grammar (4th ed.). London and New York: Routledge.
Hart, Christopher. 2010. Critical
Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science: New Perspectives on Immigration
Discourse. Palgrave.
Hengeveld, Kees and J. Lachlan Mackenzie. 2016. “Negation in Functional Discourse Grammar”. In Evelien Keizer and Hella Olbertz (eds.) Recent Developments in Functional Discourse Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 17–46.
Herkman, Juha. 2016. “Construction
of Populism: Meanings Given to Populism in the Nordic Press.” Nordicom
Review 37 (S1): 147–61.
Hidalgo-Downing, Laura; Pérez-Sobrino, Paula, Filardo-Llamas, Laura, Maiz-Arévalo, Carmen; Núñez-Perucha, Begoña; Sánchez-Moya, Alfonso; Williams-Camus, Julia. 2024. A
protocol for the annotation of evaluative stance and metaphor across four discourse
genres. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied
Linguistics 37(2): 486–517.
Hidalgo-Downing, Laura. 2021. Stance
and dialogicity in Barack Obama and George W. Bush's farewell addresses to the nation: Effectivity, epistemicity and
(contrastive) negation, Journal of
Pragmatics 1851: 93–107.
Hober, Nicole, Dixon, Tülay & Larsson, Tove. 2023. Towards
increased reliability and transparency in projects with manual linguistic
coding. Corpora 18(2): 245–258.
Hunger, Sophia, and Fred Paxton. 2022. “What’s
in a Buzzword? A Systematic Review of the State of Populism Research in Political
Science.” Political Science Research and
Methods, 1–17.
Jagers, Jan, and Stefaan Walgrave. 2007. “Populism
as Political Communication Style: An Empirical Study of Political Parties’ Discourse in
Belgium.” European Journal of Political
Research 46 (3): 319–345.
Jeffries, Lesley and Bian Walker. 2018. Keywords in the Press: The New Labour Years. London: Bloomsbury.
Koller, Veronika et al. 2023. Voices
of Supporters. Populist parties, social media and the 2019 European elections. John Benjamins.
Kranert, Michael. 2020. “When
Populists Call Populists Populists: ‘Populism’ and ‘Populist’ as Political Keywords in German and British Political
Discourse.” In Michael Kranert (ed.) Discursive Approaches to Populism Across Disciplines:
The Return of Populists and the People. Springer. 31–60.
Krippendorff, K. 2004. Content
Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
McKinlay, Andy & Dunnett, Anne. (1998). “How
gun owners accomplish being deadly average.” In Charles Antaki and Sue Widdicombe (eds.) Identities in
Talk. London: Sage. 34–51.
Moffit, Benjamin. 2016. The
Global Rise of Populism. Performance, Political Style and Representation. Stanford University Press.
Nikisianis, Nikos, Thomas Siomos, Yannis Stavrakakis, Grigoris Markou, and Titika Dimitroulia. 2019. “Populism
Versus Anti-Populism in the Greek Press: Post-Structuralist Discourse Theory Meets Corpus
Linguistics.” In Tomas Marttila (ed.) Discourse, Culture and Organization: Inquiries into
Relational Structures of Power. Postdisciplinary Studies in Discourse. Springer International Publishing. 267–95.
Page, Ruth, Johann Wolfang Unger, Michelle Zapavigna and David Barton. 2014. Researching Language and Social Media. A Student Guide. London: Routledge.
Pizarro Pedraza, Andrea and De Cock, Barbara. 2018. “Non-conforming Uses of #jesuisCharlie and Derived Hashtags on Twitter.” In Louise-Amélie Cougnon, Barbara De Cock, Cédrick Fairon (eds.), Language
and the new (instant) media (Cahiers du Cental; 9), Presses Universitaires de Louvain: Louvain-la-Neuve 99–106.
Reisigl, Martin and Ruth Wodak. 2001. “The
Discourse Historical Approach.” In Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer (eds.) Methods
of Critical Discourse
Analysis. Sage 87–121.
Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures
on Conversation, vols I and
II1, ed. Jefferson Gail. Oxford: Blackwell.
Shchinova, Nadezda. 2023. “A
Meaningless Buzzword or a Meaningful Label? How Do Spanish Politicians Use Populismo and Populista on
Twitter?” Journal of Language and
Politics 22 (6): 846–93.
. (In press). A
corpus-assisted cross-linguistic analysis of the terms populism(s) and populist(s) in French and Spanish media
discourses. Journal of Corpora and Discourse Studies [Special Issue], Keywords in
sociopolitical debates: approaches to struggles about meaning in discourse.
Schwörer, Jakob. 2021. “Don’t
Call Me a Populist! The Meaning of Populism for Western European Parties and
Politicians.” Electoral Studies 721.
Schröter, Melani, Marie Veniard, Charlotte Taylor & Andreas Blätte. 2018. A
comparative analysis of the keyword multiculturalism in French, British, German and Italian migration
discourse. In Lorella Viola and Andreas Musolff (eds.) Migration and Media: Discourses about identities in
crisis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 13–44.
Stokel-Walker, Chris. 2022. “Twitter
may have lost more than a million users since Elon Musk took over.” MIT Technology
Review. [URL] (last
accessed 30/11/2023)
Stokoe, Elizabeth. 2012. “Moving
forward with membership categorisation analysis: Methods for systematic analysis.” Discourse
Studies 14(3): 277–303.
Stavrakakis, Yannis. 2017. “How
Did Populism Become a Pejorative Concept? And Why is This Important Today? A Genealogy of Double
Hermeneutics.” POPULISMUS Working Papers No. 6. [URL]
