Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 16:5 (2025) ► pp.623–652

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

When TCM debate meets Covid-19 discourse

Identifying evidentiality in Chinese social-mediated communication

ORCiD logo with link | Shanghai Maritime University
ORCiD logo with link | University of Warwick
Published online: 28 October 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.23019.pan
Abstract
The Covid-19 pandemic has pushed medical discourse to the forefront of everyday communication, but limited scholarly attention has been given to its intersection with social-mediated language use in the Chinese context. From a corpus-pragmatic view, we examined textual data collected from Zhihu, the most popular Chinese community question-answering site. Our analysis focused on the linguistic mechanism of evidential expression in social-mediated debates on Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). Within the realm of medical scientific discussion, we identified a prevailing epistemic stance of doubt and uncertainty towards the efficacy of TCM, emphasising its socio-political significance. We also demonstrated how the ‘source of knowledge’ value and the ‘speaker commitment’ value of evidentiality interact at the semantic-pragmatic interface. Our findings shed light on a promising research trajectory for sociolinguistic intervention in the formal, descriptive line of evidentiality research, thus, advancing existing corpus pragmatics literature on evidentiality and epistemics in social-mediated communication.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Previous research on evidentiality
    • 2.1The concept and scope of evidentiality
    • 2.2Interpersonal significance of evidentiality
    • 2.3Approaching evidentiality in Mandarin Chinese
    • 3.Data and method
  • 4.Results and analysis
  • 5.Discussion and concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (49)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Babel, Anna M. 2009. “Dizque, evidentiality, and stance in Valley Spanish.” Language in Society 38(4): 487–511. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bednarek, Monika. 2006. “Epistemological positioning and evidentiality in English news discourse: A test-driven approach.” Text & Talk 26(6): 635–660. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas and Edward Finegan. 1989. “Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect”. Text 9(1): 93–124.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boye, Kasper and Peter Harder. 2009. ”Evidentiality: Linguistic categories and grammaticalization.” Functions of Language 16(1): 9–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brezina, Vaclav, Tony McEnery, and Stephen Wattam. 2015. “Collocations in context: A new perspective on collocation networks.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 20(2): 139–173. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brezina, Vaclav. 2018. Statistics in Corpus Linguistics: A Practical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brezina, Vaclav, Pierre Weill-Tessier and Anthony McEnery. 2020. #LancsBox v. 5.x. [software]. Available at: [URL]
Carretero, Marta and Juan Rafael Zamorano-Mansillaa. 2015. ”Evidentiality as conversational implicature: Implications for corpus annotation.” Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences 2121: 146–150. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. 1986. “Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing.” In Wallace Chafe and Johanna Nichols eds. Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, 261–272. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheng, Winnie. 2006. “Describing the extended meanings of lexical cohesion in a corpus of SARS spoken discourse.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 11(3): 325–344. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fang, Hongmei 房红梅. 2006. 言据性研究述评 [A review of research on evidentiality]. 现代外语 [Modern Foreign Languages], 29(2): 191–196.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, Barbara A. 2001. “Evidentiality: Authority, responsibility, and entitlement in English conversation.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 11(2): 167–192. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 2004. An introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd edition. London: Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hanks, William F. 2012. Evidentiality in social interaction. Pragmatics and Society, 3(2), 169–180. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 2012. “Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 451: 1–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “Action formation and its epistemic (and other) backgrounds.” Discourse Studies 15(5): 551–578. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hirayama, Yuto and Lisa Matthewson. 2022. “Evidential-temporal interactions do not (always) come for free.” Journal of Pragmatics, 1931, 173–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoye, Leo F. 2008. “Evidentiality in discourse: A pragmatic and empirical account”. In Jesús Romero-Trillo (ed.), Pragmatics and Corpus Linguistics (A mutualistic entente), 151–174. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hu, Zhuanglin 胡壮麟. 1995. 汉语的可证性和语篇分析 [Evidentiality and discourse analysis in Chinese]. 湖北大学学报（哲学社会科学版）[Journal of Hubei University (Philosophy and Social Science)] 21: 13–23.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan. 2007. “Semantic prosody revisited.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 12(2): 249–268. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hsieh, Chia-Ling. 2008. “Evidentiality in Chinese newspaper reports: Subjectivity/objectivity as a factor.” Discourse Studies 10(2): 205–229. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ifantidou, Elly. 2001. Evidentials and Relevance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacobsen, William H., Jr. 1986. “The heterogeneity of evidentials in Makah.” In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, ed. by Wallace Chafe and Johanna Nichols, 3–28. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacquin, Jérôme. 2022. “A contrastive corpus study of a semantically neutral French evidential marker: tu dis/vous dites [P] [you say [P]] and its relationship with agreement and disagreement.” Journal of Pragmatics 1991: 75–90. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, M. Shin. 2011. “Negotiating epistemic rights to information in Korean conversation: an examination of the Korean evidential marker — tamye.” Discourse Studies 13(4): 435–459. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lazard, Gilbert. 2001. “On the grammaticalization of evidentiality.” Journal of Pragmatics 331: 359–367. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nuyts, Jan. 2001. “Subjectivity as an evidential dimension in epistemic modal expressions.” Journal of Pragmatics 33(3): 383–400. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary. 2022. Corpus analysis of the language of Covid-19. Retrieved May 24, 2022 from [URL]
Palmer, Frank R. 2001. Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Partington, Alan. 2014. Mind the gaps: The role of corpus linguistics in research absences. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 19(1), 118–146. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peng, Altman Yuzhu and Shuhan Chen. 2021. “Traditional Chinese medicine works: A politicised scientific debate in the COVID-19 pandemic”. Asian Journal of Communication 31(5): 421–435. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plungian, Vladimir A. 2001. “The place of evidentiality within the universal grammatical space.” Journal of Pragmatics 331: 347–357. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Qi, Zhenhai 齐振海 and Xiaohan Jin 晋小涵. 2015. 言据性的语言与认知表征 [Evidentiality in linguistic and cognitive representations]. 中国外语 [Foreign Languages in China] 12(2): 32–38.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ran, Yongping 冉永平 and Yang, Na 杨娜. 2016. A pragmatic analysis of evidentiality for media information construction in the crisis context [危机语境下媒体信息的言据性及其语用分析]. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching [外语与外语教学], 61, 12–21.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raymond, Geoffrey. 2003. Grammar and social organization: Yes/No interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review 681: 939–967. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rühlemann, Christoph. 2019. Corpus Linguistics for Pragmatics: A Guide for Research. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schroeter, Melani and Charlotte Taylor. 2018. Exploring Silence and Absence in Discourse: Empirical Approaches. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scott, Piao, Paul Rayson, Dawn Archer, Francesca Bianchi, Carmen Dayrell, Mahmoud El-Haj, Ricardo-María Jiménez, Dawn Knight, Michal Křen, Laura Löfberg, Rao Muhammad Adeel Nawab, Jawad Shafi, Phoey Lee Teh and Olga Mudraya. 2016. “Lexical Coverage Evaluation of Large-scale Multilingual Semantic Lexicons for Twelve Languages”. In Proceedings of the 10th edition of the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC2016), Portoroz, Slovenia, 2614–2619.
Sinclair, John. 2004. “The search for units of meaning.” In Trust the Text: Language, Corpus and Discourse, edited by Ronald Carter and John Sinclair, 24–48. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmacs, Nicole and Altman Yuzhu Peng eds. 2023. Communications in Contemporary China: Orchestrating Thinking. Abingdon: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tantucci, Vittorio. 2013. “Interpersonal evidentiality: The Mandarin V-过guo construction and other evidential systems beyond the ‘source of information’”. Journal of Pragmatics, 571, 210–230. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, Tianhua 王天华. 2010. 论言据性的语义范围 [On the semantic domain of evidentiality]. 外语学刊 [Foreign Language Research] 11: 81–84.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wooffitt, Robin. 2001. “A socially organized basis for displays of cognition: Procedural orientation to evidential turns in psychic-sitter interaction.” British Journal of Social Psychology 401: 545–563. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhu, Yongsheng 朱永生. 2006. 试论现代汉语的言据性 [Evidential studies in modern Chinese]. 现代外语 [Modern Foreign Languages] 29(4): 331–337.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Pan, Yun
2025. Evidential Strategies in Chinese Social‐Mediated Communication: A Digital Conversation‐Analytic Approach. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 35:4 ► pp. 1953 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue