Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 16:2 (2025) ► pp.226–254

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Gendered subtle bias in Danish TV election debates

ORCiD logo with link | University of Copenhagen
Published online: 8 March 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.22109.nie
Abstract
Trust in society is related to a perception of fairness and lack of bias. But bias has many faces. This article presents a conversation analytic study of the initial introduction of the debaters in so-called ‘presidential’ TV debates during the final stages of the general election campaigns in Denmark. The data represents a rare possibility to compare almost identical debate contexts: two different elections, but same TV channel, host, presidential debate setup and campaign contexts. The analyses show how male party leaders were given a chance to construct themselves as experienced, engaged, and hardworking politicians, while a female party leader was merely positioned with regard to her gender and age and as an underdog meeting a strong opponent. This allows us to explore how bias is not just about what is actually said and done but also about what could (based on the comparison) have been said and done.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Data and method
  • 3.The 2001 debate between Fogh and Nyrup
    • 3.1Presenting the challenger
    • 3.2Presenting the incumbent
  • 4.The 2007 debate between Thorning and Fogh
    • 4.1Presenting the incumbent
    • 4.2Presenting the challenger
  • 5.Conclusion and discussion
  • Notes
  • References
References (66)
References
Álvarez, G., Oeberst, A., Cress, U., Ferrari, L. (2020). Linguistic Evidence of In-Group Bias in English and Spanish Wikipedia Articles about International Conflicts. Discourse, Context & Media, 351: 100391. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Andersen, J. (2008). Partiskiftere og politik som oplevelse. MedieKultur, 441: 6–15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Atkinson, M. (1988). Our Masters’ Voices: The Language and Body Language of Politics. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things With Words. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Balmas, M. and Sheafer, T. (2010). Candidate Image in Election Campaigns: Attribute Agenda Setting, Affective Priming, and Voting Behavior. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 22(2): 204–229. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benoit, W. L. and McHale, J. P. (2004). Presidential Candidates’ Personal Qualities: Computer Content Analysis. In: Hacker, K. Presidential Candidate Images. New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 49–63.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bode, L. and Hennings, V. M. (2012). Mixed Signals? Gender and the Media’s Coverage of the 2008 Vice Presidential Candidates. Politics & Policy, 40(2): 221–257. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burghartswieser, D., Rothmund, T. (2021). Conservative Bias, Selective Political Exposure and Truly False Consensus Beliefs in Political Communication about the ‘Refugee Crisis’ in Germany. PLoS ONE, 16(11): e0259445. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carlin, Diana B. and Kelly L. Winfrey. 2009. “Have You Come a Long Way, Baby? Hillary Clin- ton, Sarah Palin and Sexism in 2008 Campaign Coverage”. Communication Studies 60(4): 326–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carpiac-Claver, M. L. and Levy-Storms, L. (2007). In a Manner of Speaking: Communication Between Nurse Aides and Older Adults in Long-Term Care Settings. Health Communication, 22(1): 59–67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clayman, S. (1992). Footing in the Achievement of Neutrality: The Case Of News Interviews. In: Drew, P., Heritage, J. (Eds). Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 163–198.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clayman, S. E. and Heritage, J. (2002). Questioning Presidents: Journalistic Deference and Adversarialness in the Press Conferences of Eisenhower and Reagan. Journal of Communication 521: 749–75. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clementson, D. E. (2017). Truth Bias and Partisan Bias in Political Deception Detection. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 37(4): 407–430. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coleman, S., Morrison, D. E. and Anthony, S. (2012). A Constructivist Study of Trust in the News. Journalism Studies, 13(1): 37–53. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DellaVigna, S. and Kaplan, E. (2007). The Fox News effect: Media Bias and Voting. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3): 1187–234. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Devitt, J. (2002). Framing Gender on the Campaign Trail: Female Gubernatorial Candidates and the Press. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 79(2): 445–463. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Entman, R. M. (2007). Framing Bias: Media in the Distribution of Power. Journal of Communication, 57(1): 163–173. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Faucheux, R. (1994). The message. Campaigns and Elections, 15(I): 46–49.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flint, A. (1997). The Culture of Spin: Just Part of the Landscape Now: How Modern Communications Techniques Are Ingrained in Campaigns. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(8): 1190–1192. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garfinkel, H. (1964). Studies of the Routine Grounds of Everyday Activities. Social Problems, 11(3): 225–250. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1991). Respecification: Evidence for Locally Produced, Naturally Accountable Phenomena of Order, Logic, Reason, Meaning, Method, Etc. In and as of the Essential Haecceity of Immortal Ordinary Society (I) – an Announcement of Studies. In Button, G. (Ed). Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences (pp. 10–19). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gerber, A. S., Karlan, D. and Bergan, D. (2009). Does the Media Matter? A Field Experiment Measuring the Effect of Newspapers on Voting Behavior and Political Opinions. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 1(2): 35–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gidengil, E. and Everitt, J. (1999). Metaphors and Misrepresentation: Gendered Mediation in News Coverage of the 1993 Canadian Leaders’ Debates. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 4(1): 48–65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. (1979). The Interactive Construction of a Sentence in Natural Conversation. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 97–121). Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greatbatch, D. (1986). Aspects of Topical Organization in News Interviews: The Use of Agenda-Shifting Procedures by Interviewees. Media, Culture and Society, 81: 441–455. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Groeling, T. (2013). Media Bias by the Numbers: Challenges and Opportunities in the Empirical Study of Partisan News. Annual Review of Political Science, 16(1): 129–151. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haraldsson, A. and Wängnerud, L. (2019). The Effect of Media Sexism on Women’s Political Ambition: Evidence from a Worldwide Study. Feminist Media Studies, 19(4): 525–541. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, J. (2002). The Limits of Questioning: Negative Interrogatives and Hostile Question Content. Journal of Pragmatics, 341: 1427–1446. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, J., Greatbatch, D. (1992). On the Institutional Character of Institutional Talk: The Case of News Interviews. In: Boden, D., Zimmerman, D. (Eds). Talk and Social Structure. Polity Press, Cambridge, pp. 93–137.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Higgins, Michael and Fiona M. McKay. 2016. “Gender and the Development of a Political Per- sona: the Case of Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon”. British Politics 11(3): 283–300. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huls, E. and Varwijk, J. (2011). Political Bias in TV Interviews. Discourse Society, 221: 481: 48–65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hutchby, I. (1996). Confrontation Talk. Arguments, Asymmetries, and Power on Talk Radio. Lawrence Earlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Non-Neutrality and Argument in the Hybrid Political Interview. Discourse Studies, 13(3): 349–365. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jamieson, K. H. (1995). Beyond the Double Bind: Women and Leadership. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jefferson, G. (1990). List-construction as a Task and Resource. In: G. Psathas (Ed) Interaction Competence. Washington, DC: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis & University of America Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed). Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 13–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jørgensen, C., Kock, C. E., Rørbech, L. (1994). Retorik der flytter stemmer: hvordan man overbeviser i offentlig debat. Gyldendal.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kahn, K. F. (1994). The Distorted Mirror: Press Coverage of Women Candidates for Statewide Office. The Journal of Politics, 56(1): 154–173. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kondratyuk, N. and Peräkylä, A. (2011). Therapeutic Work with the Present Moment: A Comparative Conversation Analysis of Existential and Cognitive Therapies, Psychotherapy Research, 21(3): 316–330. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lang, G. E. and Lang, K. (1978). The Formation of Public Opinion: Direct and Mediated Effects of the First Debate. In Bishop, G. F., Meadow, R. G. and Jackson-Beeck, M. (Eds). The Presidential Debates: Media, Electoral and Policy Perspectives. New York: Praeger, 61–80.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langer, A. I. (2007). A Historical Exploration of the Personalisation of Politics in the Print Media: The British Prime Ministers 1945–1999. Parliamentary Affairs, 60(3): 371–387. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B. & Gaudet, H. (1944). The people’s choice. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Madsen, K. (2006). Duellen – En analyse af halduellerne mellem statsministeren og oppositionslederen i danske folketingsvalgkampe. Institut for Statskundskab, Københavns Universitet.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meeks, L. (2012). Is She ‘Man Enough’? Women Candidates, Executive Political Offices, and News Coverage. Journal of Communication, 62 (1): 175–93. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meeks, Lindsey. 2013. “All the Gender That Fit to Print: How the New York Times Covered Hill- ary Clinton and Sarah Palin in 2008”. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 90(3): 520–539. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maass, A., Salvi, D., Arcuri, L., Semin, G. R. (1989). Language Use in Intergroup Context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 571, 981–993. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peng, Y. (2018). Same Candidates, Different Faces: Uncovering Media Bias in Visual Portrayals of Presidential Candidates with Computer Vision. Journal of Communication, 68(5): 920–941. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peters, J. D. (2008). History as a Communication Problem. In: B. Zelizer (Ed). Explorations in Communication and History. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pomerantz, A. (1980). Telling My Side: “Limited Access” as a “Fishing” Device. Sociological Inquiry, 501: 186–198. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1986). “Extreme Case Formulations: A Way of Legitimizing Claims.” Human Studies 91: 219–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pomerantz, A., & Fehr, B. J. (2011). Conversation Analysis: An Approach to the Analysis of Social Interaction. In van Dijk, T. A. (Ed). Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction (2nd Ed., pp. 165–190). SAGE. Revised version of Pomerantz, A., & Fehr, B. J. (1997). Conversation Analysis: An Approach to the Study of Social Action as Sense Making Practices. In van Dijk, T. A. (Ed). Discourse as social interaction (pp. 64–91). SAGE. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rohrbach, T., Fiechtner, S., Schönhagen, P. and Puppis, M. (2020). More Than Just Gender: Exploring Contextual Influences on Media Bias of Political Candidates. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 2020, 25(4): 692–711. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ross, K. (2017). Gender, Politics, News: A Game of Three Sides. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, H. (1972). On the Analyzability of Stories by Children. In J. J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds). Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 325–345). Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A. (1979). Two Preferences in the Organization of Reference to Persons and Their Interaction. In G. Psathas (Ed). Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington Publishers, 15–21.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking For Conversation. Language, 501: 696–735. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1980). Preliminaries to preliminaries: “Can I ask you a question?”. Sociological Inquiry, 50(3/4): 104–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1993). Reflection On Quantification in the Study of Conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 261: 99–128. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tolson, A. (2012). “You’ll Need a Miracle to Win this Election” (J. Paxman 2005): Interviewer Assertiveness in UK General Elections 1983–2010. Discourse, Context & Media, 1(1): 45–53. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van der Pas, D. J. and Aaldering, L. (2020). Gender Differences in Political Media Coverage: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Communication, 70 (1): 114–143. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Nijnatten, C., Jongen, E. (2011). Professional Conversations with Children in Divorce-Related Child Welfare Inquiries. Childhood, 18(4):540–555. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Velasquez, A., Barnidge, M. and Rojas, H. (2021). Group Consciousness and Corrective Action: The Mediating Role of Perceived Media Bias and of Proattitudinal Selective Exposure. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 98(1): 105–125. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Edited by J. B. Carroll. Cambridge, UK: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilkins, C. L., Wellman, J. D., Flavin, E. L. and Manrique, J. A. (2018). When Men Perceive Anti-Male Bias: Status-Legitimizing Beliefs Increase Discrimination Against Women. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 19(2): 282–290. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue