Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 15:6 (2024) ► pp.811–838

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

‘Like to comment on that?’

Student-oriented questions in British and Montenegrin university linguistics lectures

ORCiD logo with link | University of Montenegro
 | University of Montenegro
Published online: 22 October 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.22066.ziv
Abstract
Questions are powerful interactional devices which academic lecturers may use to facilitate learning, engage students and add to a lecture’s interactivity. This contrastive and corpus-based study examines student-oriented questions, i.e. those initiating a student response, in British and Montenegrin university linguistics lectures. It aims to answer research questions regarding what forms of this question category are employed; how frequent they are, what functions they commonly perform, and whether there are any similarities and differences in these respects between the two groups of lectures. The data include 12 lectures in linguistics from several British academic corpora and a specially created corpus of 12 Montenegrin linguistics lectures. We combine quantitative and qualitative approaches to arrive at results which point to certain similarities and differences between the corpora. Some of these might be explained by the language differences between English and BCMS (Bosnian/Croatian/Montenegrin/Serbian), while others seem to have stemmed from academic lecturing style differences. The findings add to the literature on questions in academic lectures and, together with other contrastive studies, may contribute to revealing the universal and culturally-specific discourse features of academic lectures across academic cultures, as well as be pedagogically useful for lecturers, particularly novices, who are teaching linguistics in English and BCMS.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Studies on questions in academic lectures
  • 3.Academic culture
  • 4.Research questions
  • 5.Methodology
    • 5.1The corpus
    • 5.2Analytical steps
  • 6.Results and analysis
    • 6.1Imperatives
    • 6.2Incomplete declarative + a pause
    • 6.3Wh-interrogatives
    • 6.4Yes/No interrogatives
    • 6.5Multiple interrogatives
    • 6.6Incomplete interrogatives
    • 6.7Declaratives with a question word/phrase at the end
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (52)
References
Benson, Malcom. 1994. “Lecture listening in and ethnographic perspective.” In Academic listening: research perspectives, ed. by John Flowerdew, 181–198. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bamford, Julia. 2000. “Question and Answer Sequencing in Academic Lectures.” In Dialogue Analysis VII: Working with Dialogue, ed. by Malcolm Coulthard, Janet Cotterill, and Frances Rock, 159–170. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. “Interactivity in Academic Lectures: The Role of Questions and Answers.” In Dialogue within Discourse Communities: Metadiscursive Perspectives on Academic Genres, ed. by Julia Bamford, and Marina Bondi, 123–145. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johannson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blagojević, Savka. 2015. “National Writing Habits as a Potential Hindrance to International Academic Communication.” In Academic Discourse across Cultures, ed. by Igor Lakić, Branka Živković, and Milica Vuković, 6–19. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Campbell, Julie, and Richard E. Mayer. 2009. “Questioning as an Instructional Method: Does it Affect Learning from Lectures?” Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 23 (6): 747–759. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chang, Yu-Ying. 2012. “The Use of Questions by Professors in Lectures Given in English: Influences of Disciplinary Cultures.” English for Specific Purposes 311: 103–116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chesnokova, Olga. 2017. “Spanish communicative strategies in teaching of Spanish to Russian Students.” In Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (EDULEARN17), ed. by Luis Gómez Chova, Agustin López Martínez, and Ignacio Candel Torres, 10094–10101. Barcelona: IATED. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chuska, Kenneth R. 1995. Improving Classroom Questions. A Teacher’s Guide to Increasing Student Motivation, Participation and Higher-level Thinking. Bloomington: Phi Beta Kappa Educational Foundation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crawford Camiciottoli, Belinda. 2008. “Interaction in Academic Lectures vs. Written Text Materials: The Case of Questions.” Journal of Pragmatics 401: 1216–1231. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dafouz Milne, Emma, and Davinia Sánchez García. 2013. “‘Does Everybody Understand?’ Teacher Questions across Disciplines in English-mediated University Lectures: An Exploratory Study.” Language Value 5 (1): 129–151. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dudley-Evans, Tony. 1994. “Variations in the Discourse Patterns Favoured by Different Disciplines and their Pedagogical Implications.” In Academic listening: Research perspectives, ed. by John Flowerdew, 146–158. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flowerdew, John. 1986. “Cognitive style and specific-purpose course design.” English for Specific Purposes 5 (2): 121–129. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flowerdew, John, and Lindsay Miller. 1995. “On the notion of culture in L2 lectures.” TESOL quarterly 29 (2): 345–373. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996. “Lectures in a second language: Notes towards a cultural grammar.” English for Specific Purposes 15 (2): 121–140. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbons, Pauline. 2002. Scaffolding Language, Scaffolding Learning: Teaching ESL Children in the Mainstream Classroom. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of Talk. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul. 1975. “Logic and Conversation.” Speech Acts [Syntax and Semantics 3], ed. by Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58 New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hofstede, Geert. 2001. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jin, Lixian, and Martin Cortazzi. 1993. “Cultural orientation and academic language use.” In Language and culture, ed. David Graddol, Linda Thompson, and Mike Byram, 84–97. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiš, Nataša, and Ivana Savić. 2007. “O nekim tendencijama u izboru jezičkih sredstava u situaciji obraćanja, oslovljavanja i pozdravljanja.” Prilozi proučavanju jezika 381: 243–248.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koshik, Irene. 2002. “Designedly Incomplete Utterances: A Pedagogical Practice for Eliciting Knowledge Displays in Error Correction Sequences.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 35 (3): 277–309. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Košarac, Biserka. 2018. “Položaj sociologije kao temeljne društvene nauke na savremenom univerzitetu.” DHS-Društvene i humanističke studije 3 (6): 225–234.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lin, Chia-Yen. 2012. “Modifiers in BASE and MICASE: A Matter of Academic Cultures or Lecturing Styles?” English for Specific Purposes 311: 117–126. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maksić, Slavica, and Pavlovic, Jelena. 2019. “Implicitne teorije kreativnosti univerzitetskih nastavnika.“ Andragoske studije 261: 67–85.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCormick, Dawn E., and Richard Donato. 2000. “Teacher Questions as Scaffolded Assistance in an ESL Classroom.” In Second and Foreign Language through Classroom Interaction, ed. by Joan Kelly Hall, and Lorrie Stoops, 180–200. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mehan, Hugh. 1979. “‘What time is it, Denise?’: Asking Known Information Questions in Classroom Discourse.” Theory into Practice 281: 285–294. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morell, Teresa. 2007. “What Enhances EFL Students’ Participation in Lecture Discourse? Student, Lecturer and Discourse Perspectives.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 61: 222–237. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mrazović, Pavica, and Zora Vukadinović. 1990. Gramatika srpskohrvatskog jezika za strance [A Grammar of Serbo-Croatian for Non-native Speakers]. Novi Sad: Dobra vest.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mrazović, Pavica. 2009. Gramatika srpskog jezika za strance [Grammar of Serbian for Foreigners]. Novi Sad: Izdavačka knjižarnica Zorana Stojanovića.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Navaz, Abdul Majeed Mohamed. 2020. “Questions in English Medium Instruction Undergraduate Lectures in a Sri Lankan University: Why are they Important?” International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research 19 (12): 208–229. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nesi, Hilary. 2001. “A corpus-based analysis of academic lectures across disciplines.” In Language Across Boundaries, ed. by Janet Cotterill, and Anne Ife, 201–218. London: BAAL.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neuliep, James. 2018. Intercultural Communication: A Contextual Approach 7th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Netz, Hadar. 2016. “Designedly Incomplete Utterances and Student Participation.” Linguistics and Education 331: 56–73. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Olsen, Leslie, and Thomas Huckin. 1990. “Point-driven understanding in Engineering lecture comprehension.” English for Specific Purposes 9 (1): 33–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Papp, Klara K., and Frank B. Miller. 1996. “The Answer to Stimulating Lectures is the Question.” Medical Teacher 18 (2): 147–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Piper, Predrag, Ivana Antonić, Vladislava Ružić, Sreto Tanasić, Ljudmila Popović, and Branko Tošović. 2005. Sintaksa savremenog srpskog jezika [Syntax of Contemporary Serbian]. Beograd: Beogradska knjiga.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Radojević, Tamara, Jasmina Kovačević, Dragana Maćešić Petrović, Aleksandra Bašić. 2021. “Kvalitet nastave u visokom obrazovanju prema mišljenju studentata Univerziteta u Beogradu.” In On-line nastava na univerzitetima, ed. by Vladimir Katić, 218–221. Novi Sad: Fakultet tehničkih nauka Univerziteta u Novom Sadu.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rido, Akhyar. 2019. “What is Newton’s Law of Inertia?: The Use of Questions in Science Lectures.” Litera 18 (2): 312–325. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sánchez García, Davinia. 2010. Classroom Interaction in University Settings: The Case of Questions in Three Disciplines. Universidad Complutense de Madrid, MA thesis.
Sánchez-García, Davinia. 2018. “Teacher Questioning: Exploring Student Interaction and Cognitive Engagement in Spanish and EMI University Lectures.” Porta Linguarum, Monograph 31: 103–120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scollon, Ron, and Suzanne Scollon. 1991. “Topic confusion in English-Asian discourse.” World Englishes 10 (2): 113–125. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schleef, Erik. 2009. “A Cross-cultural Investigation of German and American Academic Style.” Journal of Pragmatics 41 (6): 1104–1124. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinclair, John MacHardy, and Malcolm Coulthard. 1975. Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Suviniitty, Jaana. 2010. “Lecturers’ Questions and Student Perception of Lecture Comprehension.” Helsinki English Studies 61: 44–57.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Šimić-Banović, Ružica. 2015. “Institutional Interaction in the Business Environment: Eastern European Versus Western European Countries.“ Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Zagrebu 65 (3–4): 439–480.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Susan. 1998. “Why Ask Questions in Monologue? Language Choice at Work in Scientific and Linguistic Talk.” In Language at Work. Selected papers from the annual meeting of the British Association for Applied Linguistics held at the University of Birmingham, September 1997, ed. by Susan Hunston, 137–150. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsui, Amy. 1992. “A Functional Description of Questions.” In Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis, ed. by Malcolm Coulthard, 89–110. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vuković, Milica. 2013. “The Discourse of Political Interviews: Interviewer Turns.” In Across Languages and Cultures, ed. by Igor Lakić and Nataša Kostić, 159–170. Institute of Foreign Languages: Podgorica.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wheat, Jerry, and Brenda Swartz. 2003. “Building a New University: Translating Western Academic Tradition into Balkan Culture.” Journal of Business and Economics 7 (1): 105–108.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yakhontova, Tatyana. 2002. “‘Selling’ or ‘Telling’: The Issue of Cultural Variation in Research Genres.” In Academic Discourse, ed. by John Flowerdew, 216–232. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue