Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 16:2 (2025) ► pp.282–304

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Actions of known-answer questions in guided tours

Designing further talk and soliciting participation

ORCiD logo with link | Kanagawa University
ORCiD logo with link | Kanagawa University
Published online: 22 March 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.22052.hos
Abstract
This study explores how guided tour interaction is achieved through certain question formats, specifically known-answer questions (KAQs), as they are deployed by guides for subsequently designing their talk to fit perceived visitor knowledge and for inviting visitor involvement in question-initiated talk. The approximately 470 minutes of video-recorded data come from guided tours in Japan, Belgium, South Korea, and Cambodia. In these tours, English was used as a common language among local guides and their foreign visitors. Analysis revealed how mobile tours are accomplished through sequences initiated by guides’ KAQs, exposing the guides’ strategic deployment of these questions and demonstrating how they subsequently utilized visitor responses to construct their talk. Comparison of the findings from the current study with those from previous research on KAQs in other institutional talk, such as educational and political settings, implies that, depending on the interactional goals, KAQs may perform diverse actions.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
    • 2.1Conversation analysis and question design
    • 2.2Questions in guided tours
  • 3.Data and method of analysis
  • 4.Analysis
    • 4.1Assessing visitor knowledge status
    • 4.2Assessing international visitor knowledge of the local language
    • 4.3Creating opportunities for embodied teaching and learning
  • 5.Conclusion and discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Declaration of interest statement
  • Notes
  • References
References (44)
References
Best, Katie. 2011. “Strategy in Practice: Re-Categorising Tour Guides as Strategists.” Academy of Management Proceedings 11: 1–6. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolden, Galina B., John Heritage, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen. 2023. Responding to Polar Questions across Languages and Contexts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burdelski, Matthew. 2016. “We-Focused and I-Focused Stories of World War II in Guided Tours at a Japanese American Museum.” Discourse & Society 271: 156–171. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burdelski, Matthew, and Chie Fukuda. 2019. “Multimodal Membership Categorization and Storytelling in a Guided Tour.” Pragmatics and Society 101: 337–358. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burdelski, Matthew, Michie Kawashima, and Keiichi Yamazaki. 2014. “Storytelling in Guided Tours: Practices, Engagement, and Identity at a Japanese American Museum.” Narrative Inquiry 241: 328–346. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Christidou, Dimitra, and Palmyre Pierroux. 2019. “Art, Touch and Meaning Making: An Analysis of Multisensory Interpretation in the Museum.” Museum Management and Curatorship 341: 96–115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Stefani, Elwys, and Lorenza Mondada. 2014. “Reorganizing Mobile Formations: When ‘Guided’ Participants Initiate Reorientations in Guided Tours.” Space and Culture 17(2): 157–175. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drew, Paul. 2012. “What Drives Sequences?” Research on Language and Social Interaction 451: 61–68. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Firth, Alan. 1996. “The Discursive Accomplishment of Normality: On ‘Lingua Franca’ English and Conversation Analysis.” Journal of Pragmatics 261: 237–259. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Freed, F. Alice, and Susan Ehrlich (eds). 2010. “Why Do You Ask?”: The Functions of Questions in Institutional Discourse. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fukuda, Chie, and Matthew Burdelski. 2019. “Multimodal Demonstrations of Understanding of Visual, Imagined, and Tactile Objects in Guided Tours.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 501: 20–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haddington, Pentti, Lorenza Mondada, and Maurice Nevile. 2013. Interaction and Mobility: Language and the Body in Motion. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hayashi, Makoto. 2010. “An Overview of the Question–Response System in Japanese.” Journal of Pragmatics 421: 2685–2702. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heller, Monica, Adam Jaworski, and Crispin Thurlow. 2014. “Introduction: Sociolinguistics and Tourism – Mobilities, Markets, Multilingualism.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 181: 425–458. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 2010. “Conversation Analysis: Practices and Methods.” In Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice (3rd ed.), ed. by David Silverman, 208–230. London: SageGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012a. “Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 451: 1–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012b. “The Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 451: 30–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “Epistemics in Conversation.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 370–394. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John, and Steven E. Clayman. 2010. Talk in Action: Interactions, Identities, and Institutions. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John, and Chase Wesley Raymond. 2021. “Preference and Polarity: Epistemic Stance in Question Design.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 541: 39–59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hosoda, Yuri. 2016. “Teacher Deployment of ‘Oh’ in Known-Answer Question Sequences.” Classroom Discourse 71: 58–84. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hosoda, Yuri, and David Aline. 2018. “Embodied departure from focal objects in a lingua franca campus tour.” Pragmatics and Society 91: 454–484. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021. “Establishing joint attention with multimodal resources in lingua franca guided tours.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 311, Article 100547: 1–20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jenkins, Jennifer, Alessia Cogo, and Martin Dewey. 2011. “Review of Developments in Research into English as a Lingua Franca.” Language Teaching 441: 281–315. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jenkins, Jennifer, Will Baker, and Martin Dewey (eds). 2018. The Routledge Handbook of English as a Lingua Franca. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lim, Fei Victor. 2021. Designing Learning with Embodied Teaching: Perspectives from Multimodality. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Margutti, Piera. 2010. “On Designedly Incomplete Utterances: What Counts as Learning for Teachers and Students in Primary Classroom Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 431: 315–345. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mehan, Hugh. 1979. “‘What Time is it, Denise?’: Asking Known Information Questions in Classroom Discourse.” Theory into Practice 181: 285–294. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza. 2013. “Displaying, Contesting and Negotiating Epistemic Authority in Social Interaction: Descriptions and Questions in Guided Visits.” Discourse Studies 151: 597–626. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nishizaka, Aug. 2006. “What to Learn: The Embodied Structure of the Environment.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 391: 119–154. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Psathas, George. 1995. Conversation Analysis: The Study of Talk in Interaction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roth, Andrew L. 2005. “‘Pop Quizzes’ on the Campaign Trail: Journalists, Candidates, and the Limits of Questioning.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 101: 28–46.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rusk, Fredrik, Fritjof Sahlström, and Michaela Pörn. 2017. “Initiating and Carrying Out L2 Instruction by Asking Known-Answer Questions: Incongruent Interrogative Practices in Bi- and Multilingual Peer Interaction.” Linguistics and Education 381: 55–67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1984. “Notes on Methodology.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 21–27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. Lectures on Conversation. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language 501: 696–735. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinclair, John McHardy, and Malcolm Coulthard. 1975. Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steier, Rolf. 2014. “Posing the Question: Visitor Posing as Embodied Interpretation in an Art Museum.” Mind, Culture, and Activity 211: 148–170. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya. 2010. “An Overview of the Question–Response System in American English Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 421: 2772–2781. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, Nick J. Enfield, and Stephen C. Levinson. 2010. “Question-Response Sequences in Conversation Across Ten Languages: An Introduction.” Journal of Pragmatics 421: 2615–2619. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vincze, Laura, Ramona Bongelli, Ilaria Riccioni, and Andrzej Zuczkowski. 2016. “Ignorance-unmasking questions in the Royal-Sarkozy presidential debate: A resource to claim epistemic authority.” Discourse Studies 181:430–453. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yamazaki, Keiichi, Akiko Yamazaki, Mai Okada, Yoshinori Kuno, Yoshinori Kobayashi, Yosuke Hoshi, Karola Pitsch, Paul Luff, Dirk vom Lehn, and Christian Heath. 2009. “Revealing Gauguin: Engaging Visitors in Robot Guide’s Explanation in an Art Museum.” Proceedings of Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1437–1446. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue